IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v52y2025i1d10.1007_s11116-023-10418-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trip chaining patterns of tourists: a real-world case study

Author

Listed:
  • Cong Qi

    (Southeast University)

  • Jonas De Vos

    (University College London)

  • Tao Tao

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

  • Linxuan Shi

    (The George Washington University)

  • Xiucheng Guo

    (Southeast University)

Abstract

Insights into tourist travel behaviours are crucial for easing traffic congestions and creating a sustainable tourism industry. However, a significant portion of the literature analysed tourist travel behaviour by predefined tourist trip chains which result in the loss of more representative classification. Using tourist travel survey data from Nanjing, China, this paper presents an innovative methodology that combines the tourist trip chain identification and the trip chain discrete choice model to comprehensively analyse the travel behaviour of tourists. The discretized trip chains of tourists are clustered using the ordering points to identify the clustering structure (OPTICS) clustering algorithm to identify typical tourist trip chains, which will then be considered as the dependent variable in the nested logit model to estimate the significant explanatory variables. The clustering results show that there are two main categories, namely single and multiple attraction trip chains, and seven subcategories, which were named according to the characteristics of trip chains. The clustering result is analysed and three main trip chain patterns are derived. Departure city, travel cost, travel time, and travel mode show significant influence on the choice between single and multiple attraction trip chains. The urban attraction trip chain is more favoured by tourists with children, and the typical trip chain shows stronger dependence on travel intention. Visiting Lishui for the first time only affects the choice of the multiple suburban attraction trip chain. These findings are valuable for optimising tourist public transport infrastructure, promoting travel by public transport and better tourism management.

Suggested Citation

  • Cong Qi & Jonas De Vos & Tao Tao & Linxuan Shi & Xiucheng Guo, 2025. "Trip chaining patterns of tourists: a real-world case study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 239-261, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10418-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-023-10418-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-023-10418-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-023-10418-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Krizek, 2003. "Neighborhood services, trip purpose, and tour-based travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 387-410, November.
    2. Hooram Halat & Ali Zockaie & Hani S. Mahmassani & Xiang Xu & Omer Verbas, 2016. "Dynamic network equilibrium for daily activity-trip chains of heterogeneous travelers: application to large-scale networks," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(6), pages 1041-1059, November.
    3. Daisy, Naznin Sultana & Millward, Hugh & Liu, Lei, 2018. "Trip chaining and tour mode choice of non-workers grouped by daily activity patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 150-162.
    4. Yang, Liya & Shen, Qing & Li, Zhibin, 2016. "Comparing travel mode and trip chain choices between holidays and weekdays," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 273-285.
    5. Miao, Li & Im, Jinyoung & Fu, Xiaoxiao & Kim, Haemi & Zhang, Yi Estella, 2021. "Proximal and distal post-COVID travel behavior," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Florian Schneider & Danique Ton & Lara-Britt Zomer & Winnie Daamen & Dorine Duives & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2021. "Trip chain complexity: a comparison among latent classes of daily mobility patterns," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 953-975, April.
    7. Leite Mariante, Gabriel & Ma, Tai-Yu & Van Acker, Véronique, 2018. "Modeling discretionary activity location choice using detour factors and sampling of alternatives for mixed logit models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 151-165.
    8. Xiang, Zheng & Magnini, Vincent P. & Fesenmaier, Daniel R., 2015. "Information technology and consumer behavior in travel and tourism: Insights from travel planning using the internet," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 244-249.
    9. Tang, Xinyi & Wang, Dianhai & Sun, Yilin & Chen, Mengwei & Waygood, E. Owen D., 2020. "Choice behavior of tourism destination and travel mode: A case study of local residents in Hangzhou, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Cong Qi & Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo & Ruiying Lu & Junlan Chen, 2020. "Examining Interrelationships between Tourist Travel Mode and Trip Chain Choices Using the Nested Logit Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Joachim Scheiner & Christian Holz-Rau, 2017. "Women’s complex daily lives: a gendered look at trip chaining and activity pattern entropy in Germany," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 117-138, January.
    12. Feng, Xiaoyan & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Liu, Zhiyuan & Lv, Ying, 2020. "Trip chain based usage patterns analysis of the round-trip carsharing system: A case study in Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 190-203.
    13. Khan, Mubassira & Machemehl, Randy, 2017. "Analyzing tour chaining patterns of urban commercial vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 84-97.
    14. Aaron Gutiérrez & Daniel Miravet, 2016. "The Determinants of Tourist Use of Public Transport at the Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Jaume Garcia & Catalina Juaneda & Josep María Raya & Francesc Sastre, 2015. "A Study of Traveller Decision-Making Determinants: Prioritizing Destination or Travel Mode?," Tourism Economics, , vol. 21(6), pages 1149-1167, December.
    16. Naznin Sultana Daisy & Lei Liu & Hugh Millward, 2020. "Trip chaining propensity and tour mode choice of out-of-home workers: evidence from a mid-sized Canadian city," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 763-792, April.
    17. Vu, Huy Quan & Li, Gang & Law, Rob & Ye, Ben Haobin, 2015. "Exploring the travel behaviors of inbound tourists to Hong Kong using geotagged photos," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 222-232.
    18. Ge Gao & Huijun Sun & Jianjun Wu, 2019. "Activity-based trip chaining behavior analysis in the network under the parking fee scheme," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 647-669, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Yuqiao & Gao, Linjie & Ni, Anning & Liu, Xiaoning, 2021. "Analysis of travel mode choice and trip chain pattern relationships based on multi-day GPS data: A case study in Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Fang, Jia & Yan, Xiang & Bejleri, Ilir & Chen, Changjie, 2022. "Which trip destination matters? Estimating the influence of the built environment on mode choice for home-based complex tours," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Harsh Shah & Andre L. Carrel & Huyen T. K. Le, 2024. "Impacts of teleworking and online shopping on travel: a tour-based analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 99-127, February.
    4. Bursa, Bartosz & Mailer, Markus & Axhausen, Kay W., 2022. "Travel behavior on vacation: transport mode choice of tourists at destinations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 234-261.
    5. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Fitch-Polse, Dillon T. PhD, 2024. "Is Micromobility Being Used in Place of Car Trips in Daily Travel (or “Trip Chains”)?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2r66k788, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Ren, Yilong & Lan, Zhengxing & Yu, Haiyang & Jiao, Gangxin, 2022. "Analysis and prediction of charging behaviors for private battery electric vehicles with regular commuting: A case study in Beijing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    7. Li, Xinming & Hossein Rashidi, Taha & Koo, Tay T.R., 2023. "Tourists’ travel mode and length of stay: Application of a fully nested Archimedean copula structure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Bautista-Hernández, Dorian Antonio, 2022. "Individual, household, and urban form determinants of trip chaining of non-work travel in México City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Tolcha, Tassew Dufera, 2023. "The state of Africa's air transport market amid COVID-19, and forecasts for recovery," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Tao Liu & Ying Zhang & Huan Zhang & Xiping Yang, 2021. "A Methodological Workflow for Deriving the Association of Tourist Destinations Based on Online Travel Reviews: A Case Study of Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Li, Jingjing & Kim, Changjoo & Sang, Sunhee, 2018. "Exploring impacts of land use characteristics in residential neighborhood and activity space on non-work travel behaviors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 141-147.
    12. Jie Gao & Dick Ettema & Marco Helbich & Carlijn B. M. Kamphuis, 2019. "Travel mode attitudes, urban context, and demographics: do they interact differently for bicycle commuting and cycling for other purposes?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2441-2463, December.
    13. Liu, Xing (Stella) & Wan, Lisa C. & Yi, Xiao (Shannon), 2022. "Humanoid versus non-humanoid robots: How mortality salience shapes preference for robot services under the COVID-19 pandemic?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Zhao, Chuyun & Tang, Jinjun & Kong, Xiangxin & Yu, Tianjian & Li, Zhitao, 2024. "Emission analysis of multi-mode public transportation based on joint choice model considering built environment factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    15. Bhat, Chandra R. & Sardesai, Rupali, 2006. "The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 709-730, November.
    16. Kevin Credit & Elizabeth Mack, 2019. "Place-making and performance: The impact of walkable built environments on business performance in Phoenix and Boston," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 264-285, February.
    17. Liu, Chih-Hsing & Dong, Tse-Ping & Vu, Ho Tran, 2023. "Transformed virtual concepts into reality: Linkage the viewpoint of entrepreneurial passion, technology adoption propensity and advantage to usage intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Combs, Tabitha S., 2017. "Examining changes in travel patterns among lower wealth households after BRT investment in Bogotá, Colombia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 11-20.
    19. Kim, Suji & Lee, Sujin & Ko, Eunjeong & Jang, Kitae & Yeo, Jiho, 2021. "Changes in car and bus usage amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Relationship with land use and land price," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10418-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.