IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v44y2017i6d10.1007_s11116-017-9806-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of a multimodal mobility service on travel behavior and preferences: user insights from Munich’s first Mobility Station

Author

Listed:
  • Montserrat Miramontes

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Maximilian Pfertner

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Hema Sharanya Rayaprolu

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Martin Schreiner

    (City of Munich)

  • Gebhard Wulfhorst

    (Technical University of Munich)

Abstract

The City of Munich, in cooperation with the local public transport provider MVG, is testing a pilot project of a “Mobility Station”, which is a multimodal mobility hub connecting public transport (PT) and new shared mobility services. The project’s goal is to provide sustainable mobility options that allow citizens to be mobile without owning a car. To evaluate the acceptance of the Mobility Station, as well as short and long term effects on mobility behavior, we developed an online user survey in close cooperation with the stakeholders and experts in the field of shared mobility. The results provide insights on the awareness and perception of the Mobility Station among users, their mobility patterns, current degree of multimodality, as well as actual and potential changes on mobility behavior and travel preferences due to the multimodal mobility service. Most users are young, male, and highly educated individuals with access to multiple mobility options. PT plays a central role for daily mobility together with the services they were identified to be customers of. The high share of users that use different mobility services at least once a month indicates some degree of multimodality. Actual and potential changes in mobility behavior towards multimodality were revealed. Some users declared to use other mobility services more often. They appreciate the availability of different mobility options and show interest in other services and intermodal connections indicating that there is still potential to increase multimodal behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Montserrat Miramontes & Maximilian Pfertner & Hema Sharanya Rayaprolu & Martin Schreiner & Gebhard Wulfhorst, 2017. "Impacts of a multimodal mobility service on travel behavior and preferences: user insights from Munich’s first Mobility Station," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1325-1342, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:44:y:2017:i:6:d:10.1007_s11116-017-9806-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-017-9806-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-017-9806-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-017-9806-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson & Bansal, Apaar & Cohen, Adam, 2015. "Shared Mobility: A Sustainability & Technologies Workshop: Definitions, Industry Developments, and Early Understanding," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2f61q30s, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rongen, Tibor & Tillema, Taede & Arts, Jos & Alonso-González, María J. & Witte, Jan-Jelle, 2022. "An analysis of the mobility hub concept in the Netherlands: Historical lessons for its implementation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Felix Czarnetzki & Florian Siek, 2023. "Decentralized mobility hubs in urban residential neighborhoods improve the contribution of carsharing to sustainable mobility: findings from a quasi-experimental study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2193-2225, December.
    3. Qiuchen, Wang & Jannicke, Hauge Baalsrud & Sebastiaan, Meijer, 2022. "The complexity of stakeholder influence on MaaS: A study on multi-stakeholder perspectives in Shenzhen self-driving mini-bus case," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Michela Tiboni & Silvia Rossetti & David Vetturi & Vincenza Torrisi & Francesco Botticini & Marco Domenico Schaefer, 2021. "Urban Policies and Planning Approaches for a Safer and Climate Friendlier Mobility in Cities: Strategies, Initiatives and Some Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Kinigadner, Julia & Büttner, Benjamin, 2021. "How accessibility instruments contribute to a low carbon mobility transition: Lessons from planning practice in the Munich region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 157-167.
    6. Biao Yin & Fabien Leurent, 2023. "What are the multimodal patterns of individual mobility at the day level in the Paris region? A two-stage data-driven approach based on the 2018 Household Travel Survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1497-1526, August.
    7. Sweet, Matthias N. & Scott, Darren M., 2021. "Shared mobility adoption from 2016 to 2018 in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: Demographic or geographic diffusion?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Arnold, Thomas & Dale, Simon & Timmis, Andrew & Frost, Matthew & Ison, Stephen, 2023. "An exploratory study of Mobility Hub implementation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Georgina Santos, 2018. "Sustainability and Shared Mobility Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Anastasia Roukouni & Inés Aquilué Junyent & Miquel Martí Casanovas & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, 2023. "An Analysis of the Emerging “Shared Mobility Hub” Concept in European Cities: Definition and a Proposed Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Arvid Krüger & Uwe Altrock, 2023. "Mobility Hubs: A Way Out of Car Dependency Through a New Multifunctional Housing Development?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 112-125.
    12. Arias-Molinares, Daniela & Xu, Yihan & Büttner, Benjamin & Duran-Rodas, David, 2023. "Exploring key spatial determinants for mobility hub placement based on micromobility ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Mengying Ju & Elliot Martin & Susan Shaheen, 2024. "What Is the Connection? Understanding Shared Micromobility Links to Rail Public Transit Systems in Major California Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Virginie Boutueil & Luc Nemett & Thomas Quillerier, 2021. "Trends in Competition among Digital Platforms for Shared Mobility: Insights from a Worldwide Census and Prospects for Research," Post-Print hal-03388213, HAL.
    2. Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen & Hualan Wang & Bogusław Łazarz, 2020. "A Holistic Approach to Electric Shared Mobility Systems Development—Modelling and Optimization Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Zhou, Fan & Zheng, Zuduo & Whitehead, Jake & Washington, Simon & Perrons, Robert K. & Page, Lionel, 2020. "Preference heterogeneity in mode choice for car-sharing and shared automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 633-650.
    4. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "The Expectations towards Cars to Be Used in Car-Sharing Services—The Perspective of the Current Polish Non-Users," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Craig Standing & Ferry Jie & Thi Le & Susan Standing & Sharon Biermann, 2021. "Analysis of the Use and Perception of Shared Mobility: A Case Study in Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Marcin Jacek Kłos & Grzegorz Sierpiński, 2021. "Building a Model of Integration of Urban Sharing and Public Transport Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "Selection of Car Models with a Classic and Alternative Drive to the Car-Sharing Services from the System’s Rare Users Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Nora Schelte & Semih Severengiz & Jaron Schünemann & Sebastian Finke & Oskar Bauer & Matthias Metzen, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment on Electric Moped Scooter Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Selection of Vehicles with Electric, Hybrid, and Conventional Drive for Car-Sharing Services from the Perspective of Polish Occasional System Users," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Pierpaolo D’Urso & Alessio Guandalini & Francesca Romana Mallamaci & Vincenzina Vitale & Laura Bocci, 2021. "To Share or not to Share? Determinants of Sharing Mobility in Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 647-692, April.
    11. Jiachen Li & Mengqing Ma & Xin Xia & Wenhui Ren, 2021. "The Spatial Effect of Shared Mobility on Urban Traffic Congestion: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Cláudia A. Soares Machado & Nicolas Patrick Marie De Salles Hue & Fernando Tobal Berssaneti & José Alberto Quintanilha, 2018. "An Overview of Shared Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Zhao, Yan & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2021. "The impact of autonomous vehicles on commute ridesharing with uncertain work end time," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 221-248.
    14. Yixi Xue & Yi Zhang & Yi Chen, 2019. "An Evaluation Framework for the Planning of Electric Car-Sharing Systems: A Combination Model of AHP-CBA-VD," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Xiaomei Li & Yiwen Zhang & Zijie Yang & Yijun Zhu & Cihang Li & Wenxiang Li, 2023. "Modeling Choice Behaviors for Ridesplitting under a Carbon Credit Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Lei Wang & Wenxiang Li & Jinxian Weng & Dong Zhang & Wanjing Ma, 2023. "Do low-carbon rewards incentivize people to ridesplitting? Evidence from structural analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 2077-2109, October.
    17. Koglin, Till & Mukhtar-Landgren, Dalia, 2021. "Contested values in bike-sharing mobilities – A case study from Sweden," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:44:y:2017:i:6:d:10.1007_s11116-017-9806-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.