IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v8y2023i3p112-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobility Hubs: A Way Out of Car Dependency Through a New Multifunctional Housing Development?

Author

Listed:
  • Arvid Krüger

    (Department of Urban Regeneration and Planning Theory, University of Kassel, Germany)

  • Uwe Altrock

    (Department of Urban Regeneration and Planning Theory, University of Kassel, Germany)

Abstract

Today’s urban design of new quarters in the fringes of German metropolises shows a renaissance of the garage building as a cluster for car parking. In contrast to the past, parking garages are planned as multifunctional “mobility hubs.” Planners enrich them with new mobility and sharing options and incorporate sports or social infrastructure facilities on the roof and the ground floor, thus contributing to vibrant neighborhoods. In contrast to the internationally renowned example of Nordhavn (Copenhagen), we observe a decentralization in the mainstreaming of the approach: Mobility hubs are to become constitutive parts of small subcenters. In this respect, they can be seen as a common leitmotiv for urban design in Germany’s metropolises. The hubs form a new model of local mobility, guaranteeing a certain flow of pedestrians and freeing the adjacent streets of car traffic. Integrated into a system of alternative modes of transportation and nearby mass transit, those infrastructural and mobility clusters might contribute to a change in mobility habits and ultimately reduce car dependence. If their underlying mobility policies can be implemented and if they are ultimately more successful than traditional parking garages or even create an incentive not to use private cars at all remains open to further investigation. For this purpose, the article will trace the emergence of mobility hubs in the discourse and practice of urban design with a particular focus on major new developments at the periphery of German cities. It analyzes urban design competitions and the formal planning and implementation following them.

Suggested Citation

  • Arvid Krüger & Uwe Altrock, 2023. "Mobility Hubs: A Way Out of Car Dependency Through a New Multifunctional Housing Development?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 112-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:8:y:2023:i:3:p:112-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6336
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirschner, Franziska & Lanzendorf, Martin, 2020. "Support for innovative on-street parking policies: empirical evidence from an urban neighborhood," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Daniel Bell, 2019. "Intermodal Mobility Hubs and User Needs," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    3. Elnert Coenegrachts & Joris Beckers & Thierry Vanelslander & Ann Verhetsel, 2021. "Business Model Blueprints for the Shared Mobility Hub Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Karen A. Kopecky & Richard M. H. Suen, 2010. "A Quantitative Analysis Of Suburbanization And The Diffusion Of The Automobile," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 51(4), pages 1003-1037, November.
    5. Montserrat Miramontes & Maximilian Pfertner & Hema Sharanya Rayaprolu & Martin Schreiner & Gebhard Wulfhorst, 2017. "Impacts of a multimodal mobility service on travel behavior and preferences: user insights from Munich’s first Mobility Station," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1325-1342, November.
    6. Malene Freudendal-Pedersen & Katrine Hartmann-Petersen & Freja Friis & Malene Rudolf Lindberg & Thomas Skou Grindsted, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility in the Mobile Risk Society—Designing Innovative Mobility Solutions in Copenhagen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kobe Boussauw & Enrica Papa & Koos Fransen, 2023. "Car Dependency and Urban Form," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-5.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rongen, Tibor & Tillema, Taede & Arts, Jos & Alonso-González, María J. & Witte, Jan-Jelle, 2022. "An analysis of the mobility hub concept in the Netherlands: Historical lessons for its implementation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Arnold, Thomas & Dale, Simon & Timmis, Andrew & Frost, Matthew & Ison, Stephen, 2023. "An exploratory study of Mobility Hub implementation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Anastasia Roukouni & Inés Aquilué Junyent & Miquel Martí Casanovas & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, 2023. "An Analysis of the Emerging “Shared Mobility Hub” Concept in European Cities: Definition and a Proposed Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Arias-Molinares, Daniela & Xu, Yihan & Büttner, Benjamin & Duran-Rodas, David, 2023. "Exploring key spatial determinants for mobility hub placement based on micromobility ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    5. Maciej Kruszyna & Jacek Makuch, 2023. "Mobility Nodes as an Extension of the Idea of Transfer Nodes—Solutions for Smaller Rail Stations with an Example from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Charles Ka Yui Leung & Joe Cho Yiu Ng, 2018. "Macro Aspects of Housing," GRU Working Paper Series GRU_2018_016, City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics and Finance, Global Research Unit.
    7. Jeremy Greenwood & Nezih Guner & Karen A. Kopecky, 2019. "The Wife's Protector: A Quantitative Theory Linking Contraceptive Technology with the Decline in Marriage," Working Papers wp2019_1912, CEMFI.
    8. Goulden, Murray & Ryley, Tim & Dingwall, Robert, 2014. "Beyond ‘predict and provide’: UK transport, the growth paradigm and climate change," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 139-147.
    9. David Lagakos, 2009. "Superstores or mom and pops? Technolgy adoption and productivity differences in retail trade," Staff Report 428, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    10. Hudde, Ansgar, 2022. "The unequal cycling boom in Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Budnitz, Hannah & Meelen, Toon & Schwanen, Tim, 2022. "Residential Neighbourhood Charging of Electric Vehicles: an exploration of user preferences," SocArXiv fsv7n, Center for Open Science.
    12. Samia Elattar & Hind Albalawi & Wafaa Saleh, 2023. "Parking Charges: Ingeniously Effective and Publicly Accepted in Riyadh?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Agrawal, David R. & Zhao, Weihua, 2023. "Taxing Uber," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Garth Heutel & Erich Muehlegger, 2015. "Consumer Learning and Hybrid Vehicle Adoption," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(1), pages 125-161, September.
    15. Leah Platt Boustan & Robert A. Margo, 2011. "White Suburbanization and African-American Home Ownership, 1940-1980," NBER Working Papers 16702, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Anna Lower & Agnieszka Szumilas, 2021. "Parking Policy as a Tool of Sustainable Mobility-Parking Standards in Poland vs. European Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Sweet, Matthias N. & Scott, Darren M., 2021. "Shared mobility adoption from 2016 to 2018 in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: Demographic or geographic diffusion?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Federico, Giovanni & Bisin, Alberto, 2021. "Merger or acquisition? An introduction to the Handbook of Historical economics," CEPR Discussion Papers 15795, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Kinigadner, Julia & Büttner, Benjamin, 2021. "How accessibility instruments contribute to a low carbon mobility transition: Lessons from planning practice in the Munich region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 157-167.
    20. Weustenenk, Anne Gerda & Mingardo, Giuliano, 2023. "Towards a typology of mobility hubs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:8:y:2023:i:3:p:112-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.