IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8971-d1500243.html

What About Land Uses in Mobility Hub Planning for Sustainable Travel Behavior?

Author

Listed:
  • Allan Pimenta

    (Monash Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia)

  • Liton (Md) Kamruzzaman

    (Monash Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia)

Abstract

Mobility hubs (MHs), where various transport modes converge, are increasingly being implemented as a key policy strategy to promote sustainable travel behavior. The existing literature is rich with proposals for various types of MH and suitable siting locations for them. However, studies comparing the role of land use patterns on the performance of different types of MH are scarce. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing transit patronage and active mode share as performance indicators of MHs. It compares the effects of land use patterns on the performance of different types of MH classified by the nature of transport integration (e.g., train-tram-bus, train-tram, and train-bus) in different contexts (e.g., city district and suburb) in the Greater Melbourne Area, Australia. Results show that MHs enhance the use of transit and active transport modes for commuting purposes by up to 279% and 17%, respectively, compared to a unimodal train station, with maximum usage observed in a train-tram-bus hub, followed by train-tram and train-bus hubs. However, the underlying land use patterns significantly affect their performance. Specifically, each additional hectare of commercial land within the catchment of a train-tram-bus MH in the city district, a train-tram-bus MH in a suburban area, a train-tram MH in a suburban area, and a train-bus MH in a suburban area increases transit patronage by 6%, 9%, 5%, and 4%, respectively. These findings suggest that MH typologies should be designed in tandem with supportive land uses to maximize sustainable travel behavior. The findings inform urban and transport planners in designing optimal land use patterns for different types of MH to maximize sustainable travel behavior. They also support the development of tailored land use zoning policies to enhance the effectiveness of MHs.

Suggested Citation

  • Allan Pimenta & Liton (Md) Kamruzzaman, 2024. "What About Land Uses in Mobility Hub Planning for Sustainable Travel Behavior?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8971-:d:1500243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2010. "Travel and the Built Environment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 265-294.
    2. Montserrat Miramontes & Maximilian Pfertner & Hema Sharanya Rayaprolu & Martin Schreiner & Gebhard Wulfhorst, 2017. "Impacts of a multimodal mobility service on travel behavior and preferences: user insights from Munich’s first Mobility Station," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1325-1342, November.
    3. Cui, Yuchen & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Welch, Timothy F., 2014. "Land use effects on bicycle ridership: a framework for state planning agencies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 220-228.
    4. Ding, Chuan & Wang, Donggen & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Yi & Yang, Jiawen, 2017. "Exploring the influence of built environment on travel mode choice considering the mediating effects of car ownership and travel distance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 65-80.
    5. Laura Aston & Graham Currie & Alexa Delbosc & Md. Kamruzzaman & David Teller, 2021. "Exploring built environment impacts on transit use – an updated meta-analysis," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 73-96, January.
    6. Aston, Laura & Currie, Graham & Pavkova, Katerina, 2016. "Does transit mode influence the transit-orientation of urban development? – An empirical study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 83-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonas Fahlbusch & Felix Fischer & Martin Gegner & Alexander Grahle & Lars Tasche, 2025. "Towards a Concept for a Multifunctional Mobility Hub: Combining Multimodal Services, Urban Logistics, and Energy," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Juan Palaguachi & Monserrath Padilla & Martin Ortega & Marco Romero Solorzano & Ruffo Villa Uvidia & Jairo Ortega & Diego Veloz-Cherrez, 2024. "Evaluating the Location of the Park-and-Ride System Using Multi-Criteria Methods: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Qin, Jing & Liao, Feixiong, 2025. "Space–time prism and accessibility in multi-state supernetwork: a lens for locating mobility hubs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boukarta Soufiane & Berezowska-Azzag Ewa, 2020. "Exploring the Role of Socio-Economic and Built Environment Driving Factors in Shaping the Commuting Modal Share: A Path-Analysis-Based Approach," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(4), pages 87-107, December.
    2. Xiaoquan Wang & Chunfu Shao & Chaoying Yin & Chengxiang Zhuge & Wenjun Li, 2018. "Application of Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Small and Medium Size City in China: The Case of Changchun," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Tian Li & Peng Jing & Linchao Li & Dazhi Sun & Wenbo Yan, 2019. "Revealing the Varying Impact of Urban Built Environment on Online Car-Hailing Travel in Spatio-Temporal Dimension: An Exploratory Analysis in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Enayat Mirzaei & Dominique Mignot, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Mode Choice Decision for Utilitarian and Hedonic Trips: Evidence from Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Chiu, Bing-yu, 2023. "Relationship between motorcycle travel and the built environment: Evidence from Taipei, Taiwan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Aston, Laura & Currie, Graham & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Delbosc, Alexa & Brands, Ties & van Oort, Niels & Teller, David, 2021. "Multi-city exploration of built environment and transit mode use: Comparison of Melbourne, Amsterdam and Boston," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Arefeh Nasri & Lei Zhang, 2019. "How Urban Form Characteristics at Both Trip Ends Influence Mode Choice: Evidence from TOD vs. Non-TOD Zones of the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Xiaoquan Wang & Weifeng Wang & Chaoying Yin, 2023. "Exploring the Relationships between Multilevel Built Environments and Commute Durations in Dual-Earner Households: Does Gender Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2019. "Influences of the built environment on travel: A household-based perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 710-724.
    10. He, Brian Y. & Zhou, Jinkai & Ma, Ziyi & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2020. "Evaluation of city-scale built environment policies in New York City with an emerging-mobility-accessible synthetic population," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 444-467.
    11. Gan, Zuoxian & Yang, Min & Zeng, Qingcheng & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2021. "Associations between built environment, perceived walkability/bikeability and metro transfer patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 171-187.
    12. Ostermeijer, Francis & Koster, Hans RA. & van Ommeren, Jos, 2019. "Residential parking costs and car ownership: Implications for parking policy and automated vehicles," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 276-288.
    13. Yang, Shuo & Zhou, Leyu & Zhang, Zhehao & Li, Haidong & Guo, Liang & Sun, Xiaoli & Song, Tongyang, 2025. "Revisiting the causal relationship between the built environment, automobile ownership, and mode choice using double machine learning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    14. Boukarta Soufiane & Berezowska-Azzag Ewa, 2022. "The Influence of Built Environment and Socio-Economic Factors on Commuting Energy Demand: A Path Analysis-Based Approach," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(4), pages 19-39, December.
    15. Jixiang Liu & Longzhu Xiao, 2024. "Socioeconomic differences in effect size: predicting commuting mode choice of migrants and locals using a light gradient boosting approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 1-24, February.
    16. Kwon, Kihyun & Akar, Gulsah, 2022. "People with disabilities and use of public transit: The role of neighborhood walkability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    17. Neves, Carlos Eduardo Teixeira & da Silva, Alan Ricardo & Arruda, Fabiana Serra de, 2021. "Exploring the link between built environment and walking choice in São Paulo city, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Charles Raux & Ayana Lamatkhanova & Lény Grassot, 2021. "Does the built environment shape commuting? The case of Lyon (France)," Post-Print halshs-03010833, HAL.
    19. Skuzinski, Thomas & Weinreich, David & Hernandez, Carolina Velandia, 2023. "Exploring the link between regional transportation governance and outcomes: A novel measure of polycentricity in metropolitan public transportation systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 168-175.
    20. Shi, Kunbo & De Vos, Jonas & Yang, Yongchun & Li, Enlong & Witlox, Frank, 2020. "Does e-shopping for intangible services attenuate the effect of spatial attributes on travel distance and duration?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 86-97.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8971-:d:1500243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.