IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v54y2003i3p261-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Cycle-Transitivity of the Dice Model

Author

Listed:
  • B. De Schuymer
  • H. De Meyer
  • B. De Baets
  • S. Jenei

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • B. De Schuymer & H. De Meyer & B. De Baets & S. Jenei, 2003. "On the Cycle-Transitivity of the Dice Model," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 261-285, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:54:y:2003:i:3:p:261-285
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1027378124173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1027378124173
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1027378124173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard Baets & János Fodor, 1997. "Twenty years of fuzzy preference structures (1978–1997)," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 20(1), pages 45-66, June.
    2. Basu, Kaushik, 1984. "Fuzzy revealed preference theory," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 212-227, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montes, Ignacio & Montes, Susana, 2016. "Stochastic dominance and statistical preference for random variables coupled by an Archimedean copula or by the Fr e ´ chet–Hoeffding upper bound," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 275-298.
    2. Montes, Ignacio & Miranda, Enrique & Montes, Susana, 2014. "Decision making with imprecise probabilities and utilities by means of statistical preference and stochastic dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 209-220.
    3. B. Schuymer & H. Meyer & B. baets, 2007. "Extreme Copulas and the Comparison of Ordered Lists," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 195-217, May.
    4. Montes, Ignacio & Rademaker, Michael & Pérez-Fernández, Raúl & De Baets, Bernard, 2020. "A correspondence between voting procedures and stochastic orderings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 977-987.
    5. Pahikkala, Tapio & Waegeman, Willem & Tsivtsivadze, Evgeni & Salakoski, Tapio & De Baets, Bernard, 2010. "Learning intransitive reciprocal relations with kernel methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 676-685, November.
    6. De Schuymer, B. & De Meyer, H. & De Baets, B., 2005. "Cycle-transitive comparison of independent random variables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 352-373, October.
    7. De Meyer, H. & De Baets, B. & De Schuymer, B., 2007. "On the transitivity of the comonotonic and countermonotonic comparison of random variables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 177-193, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian Hill, 2012. "Confidence in preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 273-302, July.
    2. Bernhard Arnold & Ingrid Größl & Peter Stahlecker, 2000. "Competitive supply behavior when price information is fuzzy," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 45-66, February.
    3. Conal Duddy & Ashley Piggins, 2018. "On some oligarchy results when social preference is fuzzy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(4), pages 717-735, December.
    4. Minardi, Stefania & Savochkin, Andrei, 2015. "Preferences with grades of indecisiveness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 300-331.
    5. Haven, Emmanuel, 2002. "Fuzzy interval and semi-orders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 302-316, June.
    6. Richard Baron & Mostapha Diss & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2015. "A geometric examination of majorities based on difference in support," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(1), pages 123-153, June.
    7. Labella, Álvaro & Liu, Hongbin & Rodríguez, Rosa M. & Martínez, Luis, 2020. "A Cost Consensus Metric for Consensus Reaching Processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 316-331.
    8. Conal Duddy & Juan Perote-Peña & Ashley Piggins, 2011. "Arrow’s theorem and max-star transitivity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 36(1), pages 25-34, January.
    9. Hanna Borzecka, 2012. "Multi-criteria decision making using fuzzy preference relations," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Technology, Institute of Organization and Management, vol. 3, pages 5-21.
    10. Lindstrom, Tomas, 1998. "A fuzzy design of the willingness to invest in Sweden," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Perote-Pena, Juan & Piggins, Ashley, 2007. "Strategy-proof fuzzy aggregation rules," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 564-580, June.
    12. Basarir, Aydin & Gillespie, Jeffrey M., 2003. "Goals Of Beef Cattle And Dairy Producers: A Comparison Of The Fuzzy Pair-Wise Method And Simple Ranking Procedure," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35163, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    13. S. Subramanian, 2010. "Liberty, equality, and impossibility: some general results in the space of 'soft' preferences," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 325-341.
    14. Spandagos, Constantine & Ng, Tze Ling, 2018. "Fuzzy model of residential energy decision-making considering behavioral economic concepts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 611-625.
    15. S. S. Desai & A. S. Desai, 2016. "Quasi-Transitive Rationality of Fuzzy Choice Functions Through Indicators," New Mathematics and Natural Computation (NMNC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(03), pages 191-208, November.
    16. Ait Ali, Abderrahman & Eliasson, Jonas & Warg, Jennifer, 2020. "Are commuter train timetables consistent with passengers’ valuations of waiting times and in-vehicle crowding?," Working Papers 2020:1, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    17. Santosh Desai & Rupali Potdar, 2016. "Full Rationality of Fuzzy Choice Functions on Base Domain Through Indicators," New Mathematics and Natural Computation (NMNC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(03), pages 175-189, November.
    18. repec:wut:journl:v:3:y:2012:id:1049 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Piggins, Ashley & Duddy, Conal, 2016. "Oligarchy and soft incompleteness," MPRA Paper 72392, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:54:y:2003:i:3:p:261-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.