IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revdev/v5y2002i3p273-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergence of numerical methods for valuing path-dependent options using interpolation

Author

Listed:
  • P. Forsyth
  • K. Vetzal
  • R. Zvan

Abstract

One method for valuing path-dependent options is the augmented state space approach described in Hull and White (1993) and Barraquand and Pudet (1996), among others. In certain cases, interpolation is required because the number of possible values of the additional state variable grows exponentially. We provide a detailed analysis of the convergence of these algorithms. We show that it is possible for the algorithm to be non-convergent, or to converge to an incorrect answer, if the interpolation scheme is selected in appropriately. We concentrate on Asian options, due to their popularity and because of some errors in the previous literature. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Suggested Citation

  • P. Forsyth & K. Vetzal & R. Zvan, 2002. "Convergence of numerical methods for valuing path-dependent options using interpolation," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 273-314, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:revdev:v:5:y:2002:i:3:p:273-314
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1020823700228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1020823700228
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1020823700228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dietmar Leisen & Matthias Reimer, 1996. "Binomial models for option valuation - examining and improving convergence," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 319-346.
    2. Peter Ritchken & Rob Trevor, 1999. "Pricing Options under Generalized GARCH and Stochastic Volatility Processes," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(1), pages 377-402, February.
    3. Boyle, Phelim & Broadie, Mark & Glasserman, Paul, 1997. "Monte Carlo methods for security pricing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1267-1321, June.
    4. Li, Anlong & Ritchken, Peter & Sankarasubramanian, L, 1995. "Lattice Models for Pricing American Interest Rate Claims," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(2), pages 719-737, June.
    5. anonymous, 2000. "Financial services strategic plan," Financial Update, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, vol. 13(Oct), pages 1-3.
    6. P. A. Forsyth & K. R. Vetzal & R. Zvan, 1999. "A finite element approach to the pricing of discrete lookbacks with stochastic volatility," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 87-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emilio Russo, 2020. "A Discrete-Time Approach to Evaluate Path-Dependent Derivatives in a Regime-Switching Risk Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, January.
    2. H. A. Windcliff & P. A. Forsyth & K. R. Vetzal, 2006. "Numerical Methods and Volatility Models for Valuing Cliquet Options," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 353-386.
    3. Emilio Russo & Alessandro Staino, 2018. "A Lattice-Based Model For Evaluating Bonds And Interest-Sensitive Claims Under Stochastic Volatility," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Vicky Henderson & Kamil Klad'ivko & Michael Monoyios & Christoph Reisinger, 2017. "Executive stock option exercise with full and partial information on a drift change point," Papers 1709.10141, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    5. Tian-Shyr Dai & Yuh-Yuan Fang & Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, 2005. "Analytics for geometric average trigger reset options," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(13), pages 835-840.
    6. Pavel V. Shevchenko & Xiaolin Luo, 2016. "Valuation of Variable Annuities with Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit under Stochastic Interest Rate," Papers 1602.03238, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2017.
    7. Xiaolin Luo & Pavel Shevchenko, 2014. "Fast Numerical Method for Pricing of Variable Annuities with Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit under Optimal Withdrawal Strategy," Papers 1410.8609, arXiv.org.
    8. Jérôme Lelong & Antonino Zanette, 2010. "Tree methods," Post-Print hal-00776713, HAL.
    9. Massimo Costabile & Ivar Massabó & Emilio Russo, 2011. "A binomial approximation for two-state Markovian HJM models," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 37-65, April.
    10. Shevchenko, Pavel V. & Luo, Xiaolin, 2017. "Valuation of variable annuities with Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit under stochastic interest rate," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 104-117.
    11. Simona Sanfelici, 2004. "Galerkin infinite element approximation for pricing barrier options and options with discontinuous payoff," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 27(2), pages 125-151, December.
    12. Dai, Min & Li, Peifan & Zhang, Jin E., 2010. "A lattice algorithm for pricing moving average barrier options," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 542-554, March.
    13. Massimo Costabile & Ivar Massabó & Emilio Russo, 2006. "An adjusted binomial model for pricing Asian options," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 285-296, November.
    14. Tian-Shyr Dai & Jr-Yan Wang & Hui-Shan Wei, 2008. "Adaptive placement method on pricing arithmetic average options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 83-118, March.
    15. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    16. Alex Backwell & Thomas A. McWalter & Peter H. Ritchken, 2022. "On buybacks, dilutions, dividends, and the pricing of stock‐based claims," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 273-308, January.
    17. Nabeel Butt, 2019. "On Discrete Probability Approximations for Transaction Cost Problems," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 26(3), pages 365-389, September.
    18. Kyoung-Sook Moon & Yunju Jeong & Hongjoong Kim, 2016. "An Efficient Binomial Method for Pricing Asian Options," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(2), pages 151-164.
    19. Xiaolin Luo & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2014. "Fast and Simple Method for Pricing Exotic Options using Gauss-Hermite Quadrature on a Cubic Spline Interpolation," Papers 1408.6938, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2014.
    20. Cheung, Yan-Leung & Cheung, Yin-Wong & He, Angela W.W. & Wan, Alan T.K., 2010. "A trading strategy based on Callable Bull/Bear Contracts," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 186-198, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ömür Ugur, 2008. "An Introduction to Computational Finance," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number p556, February.
    2. Li, Hongshan & Huang, Zhongyi, 2020. "An iterative splitting method for pricing European options under the Heston model☆," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 387(C).
    3. Hongshan Li & Zhongyi Huang, 2020. "An iterative splitting method for pricing European options under the Heston model," Papers 2003.12934, arXiv.org.
    4. Alex Backwell & Thomas A. McWalter & Peter H. Ritchken, 2022. "On buybacks, dilutions, dividends, and the pricing of stock‐based claims," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 273-308, January.
    5. Volodymyr Babich, 2006. "Vulnerable options in supply chains: Effects of supplier competition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(7), pages 656-673, October.
    6. Leisen, Dietmar P. J., 1999. "The random-time binomial model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1355-1386, September.
    7. Lars Stentoft, 2013. "American option pricing using simulation with an application to the GARCH model," Chapters, in: Adrian R. Bell & Chris Brooks & Marcel Prokopczuk (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, chapter 5, pages 114-147, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. V. Cvsa & P. Ritchken, 2001. "Pricing Claims Under GARCH-Level Dependent Interest Rate Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(12), pages 1693-1711, December.
    9. Dietmar P.J. Leisen, 1997. "The Random-Time Binomial Model," Finance 9711005, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 29 Nov 1998.
    10. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    11. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu & Chi-Ning Wu, 2005. "On accurate and provably efficient GARCH option pricing algorithms," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 181-198.
    12. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    13. Christoffersen, Peter & Heston, Steven & Jacobs, Kris, 2010. "Option Anomalies and the Pricing Kernel," Working Papers 11-17, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    14. Song-Ping Zhu & Xin-Jiang He, 2018. "A hybrid computational approach for option pricing," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Correia, Ricardo & Población, Javier, 2015. "A structural model with Explicit Distress," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 112-130.
    16. Xuemei Gao & Dongya Deng & Yue Shan, 2014. "Lattice Methods for Pricing American Strangles with Two-Dimensional Stochastic Volatility Models," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-6, April.
    17. San-Lin Chung & Pai-Ta Shih, 2007. "Generalized Cox-Ross-Rubinstein Binomial Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 508-520, March.
    18. Lars Stentoft, 2008. "American Option Pricing Using GARCH Models and the Normal Inverse Gaussian Distribution," The Journal of Financial Econometrics, Society for Financial Econometrics, vol. 6(4), pages 540-582, Fall.
    19. Chun-Chou Wu, 2006. "The GARCH Option Pricing Model: A Modification of Lattice Approach," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 55-66, February.
    20. Augusto Castillo, 2004. "Firm and Corporate Bond Valuation: A Simulation Dynamic Programming Approach," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 41(124), pages 345-360.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revdev:v:5:y:2002:i:3:p:273-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.