IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v36y2025i3d10.1007_s11002-025-09765-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative glossiness and traditional matteness: Impact of product surface on consumer perception and evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Ding

    (Renmin University of China)

  • Zhi Zhou

    (Renmin University of China)

Abstract

Marketers strive to communicate product innovativeness to consumers, but how to enhance consumers’ perceived product innovativeness remains a mystery. This research explores how and why product surface (glossy vs. matte) affects consumers’ perceived product innovativeness and their subsequent responses to the product. Across four studies, this research establishes an “glossy = innovative” association (Study 1), such that consumers perceive glossy products as more innovative than their matte counterparts. Subsequently, due to the enhanced innovativeness perception, glossy (vs. matte) products can win more favourable consumer evaluation (Study 2) and its impact will be attenuated for brands with a highly innovative (vs. control) brand image (Study 3). Moreover, this effect will further affect customer targeting: consumers perceive glossy (vs. matte) products as more suitable for youthful (vs. mature) consumers (Study 4). These findings contribute to the literature on product design, product innovativeness, and lay theory, and provide actionable implications for marketers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Ding & Zhi Zhou, 2025. "Innovative glossiness and traditional matteness: Impact of product surface on consumer perception and evaluation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 417-431, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11002-025-09765-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-025-09765-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-025-09765-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-025-09765-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Togawa, Taku & Ishii, Hiroaki & Park, Jaewoo & Roy, Rajat, 2023. "The temperature of newness: How vision–temperature correspondence in advertising influences newness perception and product evaluation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Yegyu Han & Mario Pandelaere, 2021. "All that glitters is not gold: when glossy packaging hurts brand trust," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 191-202, June.
    3. Uzma Khan & Ajay Kalra, 2022. "It’s Good to Be Different: How Diversity Impacts Judgments of Moral Behavior [Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(2), pages 177-201.
    4. Yazdanparast, Atefeh & Ketron, Seth, 2023. "The effect of color lightness on anticipated product comfort: The role of the lightness-softness cross-modal correspondence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Dan King & Sumitra Auschaitrakul & Yanfen (Cindy) You, 2024. "Felt something, hence it works: Merely adding a sensory signal to a product improves objective measures of product efficacy and product evaluations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 1761-1779, November.
    6. Jacob C. Lee & Sara Kim & Phyllis Xue Wang, 2022. "Anthropomorphizing makes material goods as happiness-inducing as experiences," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 61-73, March.
    7. Jie, Yun & Li, Ye, 2022. "Chronological cues and consumers’ preference for mere newness," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 527-541.
    8. Eva Marckhgott & Bernadette Kamleitner, 2019. "Matte matters: when matte packaging increases perceptions of food naturalness," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 167-178, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aparna A. Labroo & Natalie Mizik & Russell Winer, 2022. "Sparking conversations: Editors’ Pick with commentaries and thematic article compilations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-4, March.
    2. Du, Yingying & Liu, Yun, 2025. "How social crowding undermines happiness from experiential purchases more than material purchases," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Moon, Sangkil & Kim, Seung-Wook & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2024. "Dynamic relationship changes between reviewers and consumers in online product reviews," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 70-84.
    4. Iñigo Gallo & Chadwick J Miller & Nasir Haghighi & Thomas D. Gilovich, 2024. "The differential impact of uncertainty on the evaluation of material and experiential purchases," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 187-203, June.
    5. Aner Tal & Yaniv Gvili & Moty Amar, 2021. "Visual Size Matters: The Effect of Product Depiction Size on Calorie Estimates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Mohamed Didi Alaoui & Fabien Pecot & Altaf Merchant & Mathieu Kacha, 2024. "Step back in time! A construal level perspective on advertisements using brand longevity cues," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 503-518, September.
    7. Chen, Jiuqi & Wu, Peixuan & Jiang, Yushi & Lv, Linxiang, 2025. "Rough is durable, smooth is user-friendly: Effects of surface visual roughness on consumers’ perception and product preference," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Yegyu Han & Mario Pandelaere, 2021. "All that glitters is not gold: when glossy packaging hurts brand trust," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 191-202, June.
    9. Courtney Szocs & Sara Williamson & Adam Mills, 2022. "Contained: why it’s better to display some products without a package," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 131-146, January.
    10. Dianru Zhang & Chi Zhang & Li Wang, 2023. "Preventing Moral Crisis and Promoting Sustainable Development in Enterprises: A Study of Managers’ Moral Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Hu, Linfeng & Wang, Sainan & Zheng, Jiehui & Xu, Qianwen, 2025. "How to present food images on packaging? The influence of aesthetics design on consumers' perceived healthiness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Lee, Juyon & Chu, Wujin & Roy, Rajat, 2024. "Enhancing consumer evaluation of new products: The role of innovation newness and communication strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Don O’Sullivan & Leon Zolotoy & Madhu Veeraraghavan & Jennifer R. Overbeck, 2025. "Are Employees Safer When the CEO Looks Greedy?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(3), pages 655-673, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11002-025-09765-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.