IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jeczfn/v146y2025i2d10.1007_s00712-025-00919-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preference aggregation with heterogeneous beliefs and catastrophe risk

Author

Listed:
  • Weijia Wang

    (Zhejiang Gongshang University)

Abstract

We propose a novel approach to preference aggregation that accounts for belief disagreements and catastrophe risks. By restricting the Pareto condition to cases involving common beliefs and independent risks—together with another mild axiom—our framework yields a convex aggregation of beliefs and either a linear or a multiplicative aggregation of utilities. Critically, the multiplicative formulation enables catastrophe avoidance, which is essential in contexts such as financial markets where correlated beliefs can lead to systemic risks. Our results further suggest that activities arising from belief heterogeneity, such as speculative trading, may be socially desirable from an ex-post catastrophe avoidance perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Weijia Wang, 2025. "Preference aggregation with heterogeneous beliefs and catastrophe risk," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 263-279, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jeczfn:v:146:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s00712-025-00919-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00712-025-00919-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00712-025-00919-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00712-025-00919-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jeczfn:v:146:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s00712-025-00919-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.