Author
Abstract
While policies to address the digital divide often focus on improving internet digital skills, it is also crucial to ensure people can access essential physical services they still require. This study investigates the case of ongoing cash reliance in the United Kingdom in the context of declining cash usage and, accordingly, the provision of ATMs and bank branches. Utilising data from the Financial Lives 2022 survey, a large, nationally representative dataset, this research employs a logistic regression model to analyse the association between demographic characteristics and cash reliance. The findings reveal that digital exclusion, driven by low digital skills, is the strongest predictor of cash reliance, increasing the likelihood by four times. Those living in low-income households or that are unemployed also exhibit significantly higher reliance on cash, emphasising the need for equitable access. Other important factors include residing in Northern Ireland or Scotland and poor health. These geographic and socioeconomic disparities highlight the need for regionally nuanced policies to ensure adequate provision of cash access services. Interestingly, while older age is associated with cash reliance in some studies, its impact is nuanced here, becoming statistically significant and positive only when broader cash usage, rather than reliance, is considered. The model has moderately strong predictive power (as measured by McFadden’s pseudo-R-squared and confirmed by cross-validated AUC), confirming the importance of the identified predictors for policy design, although it is unsuitable for precise small-area estimation. This suggests a holistic approach incorporating these predictors alongside a broader range of local area characteristics should be adopted when evaluating the risks associated with declining cash access services and ensuring equitable access to them.
Suggested Citation
Rachel Ennis & Daniel Bogiatzis-Gibbons, 2025.
"Cash at the Crossroads: Determinants of Use and Policy Challenges in the United Kingdom,"
Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 165-195, June.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:48:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10603-025-09591-4
DOI: 10.1007/s10603-025-09591-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:48:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10603-025-09591-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.