IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v183y2023i4d10.1007_s10551-022-05075-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

LGBT-Inclusive Representation in Entertainment Products and Its Market Response: Evidence from Field and Lab

Author

Listed:
  • Yimin Cheng

    (Monash University)

  • Xiaoyu Zhou

    (ShanghaiTech University)

  • Kai Yao

    (Central University of Finance and Economics, Haidian District)

Abstract

A growing body of business ethics research has shown that firms are beginning to embrace the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community with internal organizational policies and temporary activism activities. Despite these positive developments, little research has examined firms’ LGBT inclusion strategy at the product level and whether adding LGBT representation to products helps, hurts, or has no impact on corporate products’ market performance. Prior studies have examined LGBT-themed and LGBT-vague representations and identified limitations of both. The current research presents an alternative LGBT-inclusive representation in which heterosexual and LGBT imagery are both presented, with the former receiving more exposure than the latter. A secondary analysis of 4216 movies and a controlled experiment reveal converging evidence: movies with LGBT-inclusive representation outperform those with no LGBT representation or with LGBT-themed representation. The superiority of LGBT-inclusive representation comes from its ability to appeal to consumer segments holding favorable and unfavorable LGBT attitudes. While cultural and entertainment products often play profound roles in changing society’s ethical standards and moral attitudes, they are rarely studied in the business ethics literature. Our findings fill this gap while answering a multimillion-dollar question for the entertainment industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yimin Cheng & Xiaoyu Zhou & Kai Yao, 2023. "LGBT-Inclusive Representation in Entertainment Products and Its Market Response: Evidence from Field and Lab," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 1189-1209, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:183:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-022-05075-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05075-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-022-05075-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-022-05075-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lenoir, Anne-Sophie I. & Puntoni, Stefano & Reed, Americus & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2013. "The impact of cultural symbols and spokesperson identity on attitudes and intentions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 426-428.
    2. Antioco, Michael & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Hardy, Anaïk & Bernardin, Lidwine, 2012. "On the importance of social integration for minority targeting effectiveness," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 380-389.
    3. Lenoir, A.-S.I.A. & Puntoni, S. & Reed II, A. & Verlegh, P.W.J., 2013. "The Impact of Cultural Symbols and Spokesperson Identity on Attitudes and Intentions," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2013-010-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Alan Tomhave & Mark Vopat, 2018. "The Business of Boycotting: Having Your Chicken and Eating It Too," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 123-132, September.
    5. Pandej Chintrakarn & Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Pornsit Jiraporn & Sang Mook Lee, 2020. "Do LGBT-Supportive Corporate Policies Improve Credit Ratings? An Instrumental-Variable Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 31-45, February.
    6. Anaka Aiyar & Srinivas Venugopal, 2020. "Addressing the Ethical Challenge of Market Inclusion in Base-of-the-Pyramid Markets: A Macromarketing Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 243-260, June.
    7. Mohammed Hossain & Muhammad Atif & Ammad Ahmed & Lokman Mia, 2020. "Do LGBT Workplace Diversity Policies Create Value for Firms?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 775-791, December.
    8. Katherine B. Coffman & Lucas C. Coffman & Keith M. Marzilli Ericson, 2017. "The Size of the LGBT Population and the Magnitude of Antigay Sentiment Are Substantially Underestimated," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(10), pages 3168-3186, October.
    9. Dirk Boehe & Luciano Barin Cruz, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 325-346, February.
    10. Zoey Chen & Jonah Berger, 2013. "When, Why, and How Controversy Causes Conversation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 580-593.
    11. Mary Stoll, 2009. "Boycott Basics: Moral Guidelines for Corporate Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 3-10, January.
    12. Jennifer Edson Escalas & James R. Bettman, 2005. "Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 378-389, December.
    13. Reed, Americus & Forehand, Mark R. & Puntoni, Stefano & Warlop, Luk, 2012. "Identity-based consumer behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 310-321.
    14. Micael-Lee Johnstone & Lay Tan, 2015. "Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 311-328, December.
    15. Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom, 2011. "Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 77-87, March.
    16. Ernest Biktimirov & Don Cyr, 2013. "Using Inside Job to Teach Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 209-219, September.
    17. J. Félix Lozano & Teresa Escrich, 2017. "Cultural Diversity in Business: A Critical Reflection on the Ideology of Tolerance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 679-696, June.
    18. Virginia Gerde & R. Foster, 2008. "X-Men Ethics: Using Comic Books to Teach Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 245-258, February.
    19. Liwei Shan & Shihe Fu & Lu Zheng, 2017. "Corporate sexual equality and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(9), pages 1812-1826, September.
    20. Whitney Ginder & Wi-Suk Kwon & Sang-Eun Byun, 2021. "Effects of Internal–External Congruence-Based CSR Positioning: An Attribution Theory Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 355-369, March.
    21. Michael Antioco & Joëlle Vanhamme & Anaïk Hardy & Lidwine Bernardin, 2012. "On the importance of social integration for minority targeting effectiveness," Post-Print hal-02312727, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Do, Hung X. & Nguyen, Lily & Nguyen, Nhut H. & Nguyen, Quan M.P., 2022. "LGBT policy, investor trading behavior, and return comovement," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 457-483.
    2. El Hazzouri, Mohammed & Main, Kelley J. & Carvalho, Sergio W., 2017. "Ethnic minority consumers reactions to advertisements featuring members of other minority groups," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 717-733.
    3. Reed, Americus & Forehand, Mark R. & Puntoni, Stefano & Warlop, Luk, 2012. "Identity-based consumer behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 310-321.
    4. Lenoir, A.-S.I.A. & Puntoni, S. & Reed II, A. & Verlegh, P.W.J., 2013. "The Impact of Cultural Symbols and Spokesperson Identity on Attitudes and Intentions," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2013-010-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Lenoir, Anne-Sophie I. & Puntoni, Stefano & Reed, Americus & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2013. "The impact of cultural symbols and spokesperson identity on attitudes and intentions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 426-428.
    6. Hossain, Ashrafee & Rjiba, Hatem & Saadi, Samir, 2022. "Judge Ideology and Corporate Sexual Orientation Equality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Petr Parshakov & Iuliia Naidenova & Carlos Gomez-Gonzalez & Cornel Nesseler, 2023. "Do LGBTQ-Supportive Corporate Policies Affect Consumer Behavior? Evidence from the Video Game Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(3), pages 421-432, October.
    8. Dogerlioglu-Demir, Kivilcim & Tansuhaj, Patriya & Cote, Joseph & Akpinar, Ezgi, 2017. "Value integration effects on evaluations of retro brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 124-130.
    9. Brahma, Sanjukta & Gavriilidis, Konstantinos & Kallinterakis, Vasileios & Verousis, Thanos & Zhang, Mengyu, 2023. "LGBTQ and finance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Hasan, Mostafa Monzur & Cheung, Adrian (Wai Kong) & Marwick, Trevor, 2022. "Corporate sexual orientation equality policies and the cost of equity capital," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    11. Puntoni, S., 2015. "Embracing Diversity," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA-2015-061-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    12. Simone Pulcher & Marco Guerci & Thomas Köllen, 2022. "When stakeholders claim differently for diversity management: Adopting lesbian, gay and bisexual‐inclusive practices in Italy," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 815-840, December.
    13. Bartikowski, Boris & Taieb, Besma & Chandon, Jean-Louis, 2016. "Targeting without alienating on the Internet: Ethnic minority and majority consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1082-1089.
    14. Alyahya, Mansour & Agag, Gomaa & Aliedan, Meqbel & Abdelmoety, Ziad H., 2023. "A cross-cultural investigation of the relationship between eco-innovation and customers boycott behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Carvalho, Sergio W. & Luna, David & Goldsmith, Emily, 2019. "The role of national identity in consumption: An integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 310-318.
    16. Fazli-Salehi, Reza & Torres, Ivonne M. & Madadi, Rozbeh & Zúñiga, Miguel Ángel, 2021. "Multicultural advertising: The impact of consumers’ self-concept clarity and materialism on self-brand connection and communal-brand connection," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 46-57.
    17. Ran Tao & Jian Wu & Hong Zhao, 2023. "Do Corporate Customers Prefer Socially Responsible Suppliers? An Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 689-712, July.
    18. Bernritter, Stefan F. & Verlegh, Peeter W.J. & Smit, Edith G., 2016. "Why Nonprofits Are Easier to Endorse on Social Media: The Roles of Warmth and Brand Symbolism," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 27-42.
    19. Wen, Na & Lurie, Nicholas H., 2018. "The Case for Compatibility: Product Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Upper versus Lowercase Brand Names," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 393-407.
    20. Lynch, John G. & Bradlow, Eric T. & Huber, Joel C. & Lehmann, Donald R., 2015. "Reflections on the replication corner: In praise of conceptual replications," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 333-342.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:183:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-022-05075-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.