IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v60y2022i3d10.1007_s10614-021-10171-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tail Risk Early Warning System for Capital Markets Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Zongxin Zhang

    (Fudan University)

  • Ying Chen

    (Fudan University)

Abstract

Scientific and effective tail risk measurement and early warning are key points and difficulties in the identification and control of major risks in capital markets. In this paper, we use the autoregressive conditional Fréchet model (AcF) to construct a tail risk measurement index for the capital market in China. The tail risk status identified by the scientific index method is used as a monitoring anchor to construct and optimize a tail risk early warning model based on machine learning algorithms. The study yields three findings. (1) The AcF model can overcome the shortcomings of traditional models in tail risk measurement and significantly improve the tail risk measurement efficiency of the capital market. (2) Tail risk synergies between equity and bond markets are significantly stronger than yield synergies, and the tail risk measure index has the role of a leading indicator of significant risk in capital markets. (3) Based on the joint test of risk status and crisis identification efficiency, the Logit model of crisis identification fails whereas the tail risk warning model optimized by machine learning algorithms can accurately identify crises and significant risks. The optimal early warning model pairings for the stock market and bond market are the oversampling-random forest algorithm and the double sampling-random forest algorithm, respectively, with out-of-sample crisis warning accuracies of 81.94% and 90.20%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Zongxin Zhang & Ying Chen, 2022. "Tail Risk Early Warning System for Capital Markets Based on Machine Learning Algorithms," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 901-923, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:60:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-021-10171-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-021-10171-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-021-10171-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-021-10171-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Billio, Monica & Getmansky, Mila & Lo, Andrew W. & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2012. "Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 535-559.
    2. Sylvain Benoit & Jean-Edouard Colliard & Christophe Hurlin & Christophe Pérignon, 2017. "Where the Risks Lie: A Survey on Systemic Risk," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 21(1), pages 109-152.
    3. Robert F. Engle & Simone Manganelli, 2004. "CAViaR: Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk by Regression Quantiles," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22, pages 367-381, October.
    4. Graciela Kaminsky & Saul Lizondo & Carmen M. Reinhart, 1998. "Leading Indicators of Currency Crises," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 45(1), pages 1-48, March.
    5. Jansen, Dennis W & de Vries, Casper G, 1991. "On the Frequency of Large Stock Returns: Putting Booms and Busts into Perspective," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 73(1), pages 18-24, February.
    6. Amihud, Yakov, 2002. "Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 31-56, January.
    7. George S. Atsalakis & Eftychios E. Protopapadakis & Kimon P. Valavanis, 2016. "Stock trend forecasting in turbulent market periods using neuro-fuzzy systems," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 245-269, July.
    8. Döpke, Jörg & Fritsche, Ulrich & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2017. "Predicting recessions with boosted regression trees," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 745-759.
    9. Li, Yanshuang & Zhuang, Xintian & Wang, Jian & Zhang, Weiping, 2020. "Analysis of the impact of Sino-US trade friction on China’s stock market based on complex networks," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. Zhao, Zifeng & Zhang, Zhengjun & Chen, Rong, 2018. "Modeling maxima with autoregressive conditional Fréchet model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 325-351.
    11. Girardi, Giulio & Tolga Ergün, A., 2013. "Systemic risk measurement: Multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3169-3180.
    12. Sylvain Benoit & Jean-Edouard Colliard & Christophe Hurlin & Christophe Pérignon, 2017. "Where the Risks Lie: A Survey on Systemic Risk," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 21(1), pages 109-152.
    13. Berg, Andrew & Pattillo, Catherine, 1999. "Predicting currency crises:: The indicators approach and an alternative," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 561-586, August.
    14. Daniele Massacci, 2017. "Tail Risk Dynamics in Stock Returns: Links to the Macroeconomy and Global Markets Connectedness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 3072-3089, September.
    15. Beutel, Johannes & List, Sophia & von Schweinitz, Gregor, 2019. "Does machine learning help us predict banking crises?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denisa Banulescu-Radu & Christophe Hurlin & Jérémy Leymarie & Olivier Scaillet, 2021. "Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5730-5754, September.
    2. Laura Garcia-Jorcano & Lidia Sanchis-Marco, 2023. "Measuring Systemic Risk Using Multivariate Quantile-Located ES Models," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 1-72.
    3. Christian Kubitza, 2021. "Tackling the Volatility Paradox: Spillover Persistence and Systemic Risk," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 079, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    4. Abendschein, Michael & Grundke, Peter, 2018. "On the ranking consistency of global systemic risk measures: empirical evidence," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181623, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Garcia-Jorcano, Laura & Sanchis-Marco, Lidia, 2021. "Systemic-systematic risk in financial system: A dynamic ranking based on expectiles," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 330-365.
    6. Chen, Yan & Mo, Dongxu & Xu, Zezhou, 2022. "A study of interconnections and contagion among Chinese financial institutions using a ΔCoV aR network," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    7. Kubitza, Christian & Regele, Fabian, 2017. "Persistence of insurance activities and financial stability," ICIR Working Paper Series 30/17, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    8. Lorenzo Frattarolo & Francesca Parpinel & Claudio Pizzi, 2020. "Combining permutation tests to rank systemically important banks," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 29(3), pages 581-596, September.
    9. Bernardi, Mauro & Maruotti, Antonello & Petrella, Lea, 2017. "Multiple risk measures for multivariate dynamic heavy–tailed models," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-32.
    10. Feng, Yusen & Wang, Gang-Jin & Zhu, You & Xie, Chi, 2023. "Systemic risk spillovers and the determinants in the stock markets of the Belt and Road countries," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    11. Bonaccolto, Giovanni & Caporin, Massimiliano & Paterlini, Sandra, 2019. "Decomposing and backtesting a flexible specification for CoVaR," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Figini, Silvia & Maggi, Mario & Uberti, Pierpaolo, 2020. "The market rank indicator to detect financial distress," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 63-73.
    13. Zhang, Weiping & Zhuang, Xintian & Wang, Jian & Lu, Yang, 2020. "Connectedness and systemic risk spillovers analysis of Chinese sectors based on tail risk network," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Shivani Narayan & Dilip Kumar, 2023. "Systemic Risk Transmission from the United States to Asian Economies During the COVID-19 Period," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 22(1), pages 57-84, March.
    15. Cipollini, Fabrizio & Giannozzi, Alessandro & Menchetti, Fiammetta & Roggi, Oliviero, 2020. "The beauty contest between systemic and systematic risk measures: Assessing the empirical performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 316-332.
    16. Caporin, Massimiliano & Costola, Michele & Garibal, Jean-Charles & Maillet, Bertrand, 2022. "Systemic risk and severe economic downturns: A targeted and sparse analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Fukker, Gábor & Kaijser, Michiel & Mingarelli, Luca & Sydow, Matthias, 2022. "Contagion from market price impact: a price-at-risk perspective," Working Paper Series 2692, European Central Bank.
    18. Cumperayot, Phornchanok & Kouwenberg, Roy, 2013. "Early warning systems for currency crises: A multivariate extreme value approach," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 151-171.
    19. Kanga, Désiré & Soumaré, Issouf & Amenounvé, Edoh, 2023. "Can corporate financing through the stock market create systemic risk? Evidence from the BRVM securities market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    20. Dai, Zhifeng & Tang, Rui & Zhang, Xinhua, 2023. "Multilayer network analysis for measuring the inter-connectedness between the oil market and G20 stock markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:60:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-021-10171-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.