IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijfr11/v16y2025i3p74-94.html

Emotional Reactions of Students to Perceptions of Negative Trends and Small Losses in Short-Term Stock Market Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Alain Finet
  • Kevin Kristoforidis
  • Julie Laznicka

Abstract

Decision-making on stock markets is a complex experience characterized by strong emotions (Nofsinger, 2017). Price fluctuations are stimuli that can cause a wide range of psychological reactions in investors (Shiv et al., 2005). In particular, the perception of loss is a central area in behavioral finance: loss aversion (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979) suggests that the psychological impact of a loss is stronger than a gain of the same size. Traditionally, attention has focused on significant financial losses or bear markets, where intense emotions such as fear and panic are commonly found (Shiller, 2014). However, our study suggests addressing a less examined side of the emotional experience: the psychological and behavioral reactions of individuals to the perception of negative trends and small losses. Our goal is to understand if and how perceived unfavorable small stock market movements could induce significant emotional responses, particularly among novice investors. For this purpose, we used a qualitative exploratory study with eight students participating in a short-term (three-day) stock market simulation. During this period, the stock market index on which the students based their investments declined by 0.36%. This fluctuation does not constitute a bear market in the financial sense generally recognized. Nevertheless, our findings show that participants actively perceived a ¡®general negative trend¡¯ and exhibited significant emotional reactions, even facing small financial losses. Based on semi-structured interviews, our article aims at: 1) identifying the range of emotions felt by participants during the simulation; 2) describing the development of these emotions in response to perceived market variations; and 3) conducting a thematic analysis of their influence on participants' decisions, with a particular focus on emotional regret related to small losses and reactions to uncertainty and perceived losses. Our results demonstrate a significant change in emotions over time. From an initial interest and a relative emotional detachment, students show a growing emotional commitment to market fluctuations. Moreover, as the experiment progresses and disappointments increase, the emotional picture is largely defined by negative emotions, notably fear in relation to potential losses, as well as sadness and disappointment related to unfavorable results. Market surprises, particularly sudden falls, lead to intense reactions, which can result in panic and impulsive decisions. Given the inability to improve the financial situation, the experience can also result in abandonment and resignation. By examining these dynamics, we aim at contributing to understanding emotional impact in behavioral finance, beyond major crisis scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Alain Finet & Kevin Kristoforidis & Julie Laznicka, 2025. "Emotional Reactions of Students to Perceptions of Negative Trends and Small Losses in Short-Term Stock Market Simulation," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 16(3), pages 74-94, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:16:y:2025:i:3:p:74-94
    DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v16n3p74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/28539/17400
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/28539
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/ijfr.v16n3p74?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bechara, Antoine & Damasio, Antonio R., 2005. "The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 336-372, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dow Alexander & Dow Sheila C., 2011. "Animal Spirits Revisited," Capitalism and Society, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Da Silva, Sergio, 2009. "Does Macroeconomics Need Microeconomic Foundations?," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 3, pages 1-11.
    3. Hamelin, Nicolas & Bonelli, Marco I., 2022. "Traders’ anticipatory feelings and traders’ profitability: An exploratory study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    4. Adam, Marc T.P. & Astor, Philipp J. & Krämer, Jan, 2016. "Affective Images, Emotion Regulation and Bidding Behavior: An Experiment on the Influence of Competition and Community Emotions in Internet Auctions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 56-69.
    5. Kyra L Wiggin & Martin Reimann & Shailendra P Jain & Darren W Dahl & Margaret C Campbell & Paul M Herr, 2019. "Curiosity Tempts Indulgence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1194-1212.
    6. Rengifo, Erick W. & Trifan, Emanuela, 2007. "Investors Facing Risk: Loss Aversion and Wealth Allocation Between Risky and Risk-Free Assets," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 28063, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Timo Ehrig & Jaison Manjaly & Aditya Singh & Shyam Sunder, 2022. "Adaptive Rationality in Strategic Interaction: Do Emotions Regulate Thinking About Others?," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 330-349, December.
    8. Trujillo, Carlos A., 2008. "Book essay on Flemming Hansen and Sverre Riis Christensen (2007), Emotions, advertising and consumer choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(9), pages 982-985, September.
    9. Michael Lainé, 2014. "Do animal spirits rely on somatic markers? Keynes in light of neuroscience," Post-Print hal-04264919, HAL.
    10. Stephanie Lichtenfeld & Vanessa L Buechner & Markus A Maier & Maria Fernández-Capo, 2015. "Forgive and Forget: Differences between Decisional and Emotional Forgiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    11. Klaus Wälde & Agnes Moors, 2016. "Current Emotion Research in Economics," Working Papers 1612, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    12. Muminović Adnan, 2023. "Not Just Empty Rhetoric: The Economic Cost of Warmongering in a Post-Conflict Environment," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 112-125, December.
    13. Hans-Rüdiger Pfister & Gisela Böhm, 2012. "Responder Feelings in a Three-Player Three-Option Ultimatum Game: Affective Determinants of Rejection Behavior," Games, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-29, February.
    14. Caliendo, Marco & Fossen, Frank & Kritikos, Alexander, 2010. "The impact of risk attitudes on entrepreneurial survival," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 45-63, October.
    15. Rubén Ortuño & José M. Sánchez & Diego Álvarez & Miguel López & Fernando León, 2020. "Neurometrics applied to banknote and security features design," Occasional Papers 2008, Banco de España.
    16. John R. Nofsinger & Corey A. Shank, 2019. "DEEP sleep: The impact of sleep on financial risk taking," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 92-105, January.
    17. Martin Geisler & Carl Martin Allwood, 2015. "Competence and Quality in Real-Life Decision Making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Yusuke Hayashi & Anne M Foreman & Jonathan E Friedel & Oliver Wirth, 2019. "Threat appeals reduce impulsive decision making associated with texting while driving: A behavioral economic approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Wichary, Szymon & Allenbach, Monika & von Helversen, Bettina & Kaszás, Dániel & Sterna, Radosław & Hoelscher, Christoph & Andraszewicz, Sandra, 2023. "Skin conductance predicts earnings in a market bubble-and-crash scenario," OSF Preprints ybu8z, Center for Open Science.
    20. Long Zhang & Kai Wang & Chunyan Zhu & Fengqiong Yu & Xingui Chen, 2015. "Trait Anxiety Has Effect on Decision Making under Ambiguity but Not Decision Making under Risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:16:y:2025:i:3:p:74-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gina Perry (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijfr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.