IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijfr11/v12y2021i4p277-293.html

Compliance With International Financial Reporting Standards and Value Relevance of Accounting Information in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Unity Maqeda Putsai
  • Msizi Mkhize

Abstract

The objective of the study is to investigate the relationship between the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS 1) and the value relevance (VR) of accounting information. In this study forty-six companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange during the period 1993 to 2017. Panel data is used to compare the period before and after IFRS. The companies in the sample are composed of the following sectors; mining, manufacturing, banks and investment companies, real estate, general industry, retailers, construction and material, chemical and software, and computers. Based on the yearly financial reports published by public companies in South Africa, the study employed the Cookes (1992) Unweighted Disclosure Index to measure the level of compliance in South Africa. Fifty-six disclosure elements from IFRS 1 were utilized to measure the compliance level. Thereafter Ohlson (1995) Model is used with dummy variables to compare the pre-and post-IFRS period. First, the study reflected that most of the South African companies exhibit higher compliance rates ranging from 87 to 93.417 which is impressive. On the other hand, 4 companies recorded Medium level compliance that is between 60% to 79% compliance level. The findings further revealed that there is a significant positive association between compliance with IFRS 1 and the value relevance of accounting information.

Suggested Citation

  • Unity Maqeda Putsai & Msizi Mkhize, 2021. "Compliance With International Financial Reporting Standards and Value Relevance of Accounting Information in South Africa," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(4), pages 277-293, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:277-293
    DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v12n4p277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/20682/12715
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/20682
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/ijfr.v12n4p277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ross, Stephen A, 1973. "The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 134-139, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karbowski, Adam, 2009. "The corporate governance implications for China," MPRA Paper 73625, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Adi Masli & Matthew G. Sherwood & Rajendra P. Srivastava, 2018. "Attributes and Structure of an Effective Board of Directors: A Theoretical Investigation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(4), pages 485-523, December.
    3. Ernest Dautovic, 2019. "Has Regulatory Capital Made Banks Safer? Skin in the Game vs Moral Hazard," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 19.03, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    4. Chen, Xuchang & Wu, Changqi & Xie, Xuanli, 2025. "Foreign ownership and corporate litigation risk," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Xin Qu & Majella Percy & Fang Hu & Jenny Stewart, 2022. "Can CEO equity‐based compensation limit investment‐related agency problems?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2579-2614, June.
    6. Fikayo Akeredolu, 2026. "Principal–Agent Theory and Results-Based Climate Finance: A Review of Lessons from the World Bank's Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(2), pages 8018-8027, February.
    7. Zhaohui Yan & Mingli Wang & Yumeng Sun & Zihui Nan, 2023. "The Impact of Research and Development Investment on Total Factor Productivity of Animal Husbandry Enterprises: Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Patrick Velte, 2025. "Audit Quality and Materiality Disclosure Quality in Integrated Reporting: The Moderating Effect of Carbon Assurance Quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3785-3801, May.
    9. Robert E. Till & Mary Beth Yount, 2019. "Governance and Incentives: Is It Really All about the Money?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 605-618, October.
    10. Dimitrios Karakostas & Ioannis Tsakalos & Athanasios Fassas & Dimitris Kenourgios, 2026. "The disciplinary effect of banking supervision: is the EU-wide 2023 stress test merely a supervisory formality?," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-11, March.
    11. Maria del Mar Miras & Bernabe Escobar & Amalia Carrasco, 2014. "Are Spanish Listed Firms Betting on CSR during the Crisis? Evidence from the Agency Problem," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(1), pages 85-95, March.
    12. Zheng, Kaiming & Wang, Xiaoyuan & Ni, Debing, 2021. "Reciprocity information and wage personalization," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo, 2018. "Moral hazard: Base models and two extensions," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume I, chapter 16, pages 453-485, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Zeeshan Noor Siddiqui, 2017. "Understanding the Linkage among Public Procurement (PP), Corruption, and Tax Morale (TM) Through Agency Theory (AT): A Review," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(3), pages 258-288, September.
    15. Lin Meng & George Xianzhi Yuan & Huiqi Wang, 2025. "Dynamic Incentive Strategies for Principal‐Agent Coopetition: A Stochastic Approach to Managing Risks and Performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(7), pages 3976-3997, October.
    16. Ece ZEYBEK YILMAZ & Göksel ATAMAN BERK, 2020. "Vekâlet Kuramına Göre Türkiye’deki Otellerin Pazara Giriş Stratejilerinin Değerlendirilmesi," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(88), pages 145-168, June.
    17. Ndayisaba, Gilbert A. & Ahmed, Abdullahi D., 2021. "Demystifying the paradoxical popularity of stock buybacks in a market environment characterised by high stock prices," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    18. Ana REIS & Maria do Rosário CORREIA & Luís PACHECO, 2026. "Gender Diversity And Firm Performance: The Case Of Portuguese Medium Firms," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 21(1), pages 253-279, April.
    19. Yu, Zhen & Luo, Juncheng & Fan, Jinqi, 2024. "Bank loan approval standards and firms’ accounting conservatism: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    20. Khantimirov, Denis & Karande, Kiran, 2018. "Complaint as a persuasion attempt: Front line employees’ perceptions of complaint legitimacy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 68-76.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:277-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gina Perry (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijfr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.