IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v13y2024i2p11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Organizational Efficiency and Accountability: A Comprehensive Analysis of Performance Management in the Malaysian Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Ruhana Binti Mohamad Zam
  • Syahrul Ahmar Ahmad
  • Aida Maria Ismail
  • Aida Hazlin Ismail

Abstract

In this paper, we impart on performance management in the Malaysian public sector and the fact that performance is a broad topic with varied users in different circumstances makes it difficult to match the design for performance indicators in the public sector. This study uses the qualitative method and goal-setting theory. The theory and concept of goal setting can apply to individual and organizational levels. The goal-setting theory describes that performance, and a set of clear, quantifiable goals are directly related. If managers are aware of their objectives, they are more motivated to work more diligently, which raises performance. To achieve goal setting among the most senior level of management in the public sector, it is essential to answer the crucial question regarding which indicators or criteria are needed. Even though several prior studies attempted to explain factors that influence performance management, to the best of the researcher’s knowledge, there is a lack of studies that have looked at the factors that influence performance management through in-depth interviews with the organization’s management itself such as Chief or Head of Ministries or organization’s department. Hence, this study provides empirical research into the factors that influence performance management in Malaysian public sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruhana Binti Mohamad Zam & Syahrul Ahmar Ahmad & Aida Maria Ismail & Aida Hazlin Ismail, 2024. "Enhancing Organizational Efficiency and Accountability: A Comprehensive Analysis of Performance Management in the Malaysian Public Sector," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/25598/15874
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/25598
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Bakhit Jaafreh & Abedalfattah Z. Al-abedallat, 2013. "The Effect of Quality Management Practices on Organizational Performance in Jordan: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 93-109, January.
    2. Mark Moore & Jean Hartley, 2008. "Innovations in governance," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 3-20, January.
    3. Mike Bolton, 2003. "Public sector performance measurement: delivering greater accountability," Work Study, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 52(1), pages 20-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    2. Klas Palm & Johan Lilja, 2021. "On the road to Agenda 2030 together in a complex alliance of Swedish public authorities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9564-9580, June.
    3. Serene Ho & Joep Crompvoets & Jantien Stoter, 2018. "3D Geo-Information Innovation in Europe’s Public Mapping Agencies: A Public Value Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Novak, David C. & Koliba, Chris & Zia, Asim & Tucker, Matt, 2015. "Evaluating the outcomes associated with an innovative change in a state-level transportation project prioritization process: A case study of Vermont," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 130-143.
    5. Nilssen, Maja, 2019. "To the smart city and beyond? Developing a typology of smart urban innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 98-104.
    6. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Ani MATEI & Corina-Georgiana ANTONOVICI & Carmen SAVULESCU, 2015. "Innovative Public Marketing As Instrument For Creating The Social Value," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(Special i), pages 21-34, September.
    8. Tirziu, Andreea-Maria, 2016. "Inovarea socială – o viziune benefică asupra sectorului public. Studiu de caz: inovarea socială în universităڏile publice din Italia [Social innovation – a beneficial vision on the public sector. C," MPRA Paper 77705, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2016.
    9. Triyuth Promsiri & Krisakorn Sukavejworakit & Vasu Keerativutisest & Thanaphol Virasa & Krischanan Kampanthong, 2022. "Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Silvia FISSI & Elena GORI & Alberto ROMOLINI, 2013. "Local Authority versus Local Public Utilities: A Governance Issue," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2013(20), pages 35-48, June.
    11. Never, Jan & Suau-Sanchez, Pere, 2020. "Challenging the interline and codeshare legacy: Drivers and barriers for airline adoption of airport facilitated inter-airline network connectivity schemes," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Chun-Chieh Ma & Hsiao-Ping Chang, 2019. "Environmental Consciousness in Local Sustainable Development: A Case Study of the Anti-Idling Policy in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Peter Olatunji Olayiwola & Shola Solomon Akeke & Olubusola Mojisola Odusanya, 2019. "Quality Control Management and Customer Retention in Selected Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 22(71), pages 60-78, March.
    14. John, Laura, 2022. "Rethinking digital governance - How collaborative innovation strategies advance the development of digital innovations in public organisations," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(5), pages 1400-1418.
    15. Soyoung Park & Yinglee Tseng & Sungchan Kim, 2016. "The Impact of Innovation on Job Satisfaction: Evidence from U.S. Federal Agencies," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 274-286, January.
    16. Ian Scott, 2021. "Context and innovation in traditional bureaucracies: A Hong Kong study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 12-22, February.
    17. Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    18. Banu Demirel & Ayça Kübra Hızarcı Payne, 2018. "Social Innovation Adoption Behavior: The Case of Zumbara," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Arwin van Buuren & Jasper Eshuis & Nanny Bressers, 2015. "The Governance of Innovation in Dutch Regional Water Management: Organizing fit between organizational values and innovative concepts," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 679-697, May.
    20. Bruce C. Glavovic, 2013. "Coastal Innovation Paradox," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-22, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.