IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7427-d841296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Triyuth Promsiri

    (College of Management, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Krisakorn Sukavejworakit

    (College of Management, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Vasu Keerativutisest

    (King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

  • Thanaphol Virasa

    (College of Management, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Krischanan Kampanthong

    (Stamford International University, Bangkok 10250, Thailand)

Abstract

Thailand’s 4.0 strategy intends to achieve prosperity, security, and sustainability for its citizens both today and in the distant future. By focusing on the public sector and its civil servants, the government is driving innovation in the public sector by using design thinking (DT) to train government officials to improve public sector innovation (PSI). However, despite studies being conducted on DT and its increasing popularity among scholars, there is still a gap between knowledge and practice with regard to the learning effectiveness of the DT methodology in terms of fostering public sector innovation. Therefore, the authors’ objective for this study was to explore the effectiveness of DT in the Thai PSI and measure the learning effectiveness of the design thinking method (DTM). The researchers conducted action research through a series of workshops and in-class activities involving both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The sample was made up of government officials participating in the Thai Government Innovation Lab (GIL) project in 2020 and 2021. The results on the effectiveness of the program showed that fostering government innovation through DT education led to highly sustainable and highly effective outcomes. This study contributes to the development of public innovation by implementing the DTM as a core methodology for fostering innovation in public organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Triyuth Promsiri & Krisakorn Sukavejworakit & Vasu Keerativutisest & Thanaphol Virasa & Krischanan Kampanthong, 2022. "Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7427-:d:841296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7427/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7427/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xavier Pavie & Daphné Carthy, 2014. "Addressing the Wicked Problem of Responsible Innovation through Design Thinking," Post-Print hal-00921428, HAL.
    2. Pattarachit Choompol Gozzoli & Theerada Rongrat & Roberto Bruno Gozzoli, 2022. "Design Thinking and Urban Community Development: East Bangkok," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Xavier Pavie & Daphné Carthy, 2014. "Addressing the Wicked Problem of Responsible Innovation through Design Thinking," Working Papers hal-00921428, HAL.
    4. Michael McGann & Emma Blomkamp & Jenny M. Lewis, 2018. "The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 249-267, September.
    5. Mark Moore & Jean Hartley, 2008. "Innovations in governance," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 3-20, January.
    6. Jui-Che Tu & Li-Xia Liu & Kuan-Yi Wu, 2018. "Study on the Learning Effectiveness of Stanford Design Thinking in Integrated Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josip Maric & Florence Rodhain & Yves Barlette, 2015. "Open and Responsible Innovation Concepts for Competitive Advantage," Post-Print hal-01967494, HAL.
    2. Lukovics, Miklós & Flipse, Steven M. & Udvari, Beáta & Fisher, Erik, 2017. "Responsible research and innovation in contrasting innovation environments: Socio-Technical Integration Research in Hungary and the Netherlands," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 172-182.
    3. Ryan Anders Whitney & David López-García, 2023. "Fast-track institutionalization: The opening of urban planning best practice agencies in Mexico City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 600-616, May.
    4. Alfonso Unceta & Xabier Barandiaran & Natalia Restrepo, 2019. "The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance—The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Jih-Sheng Lo & Chi-Hung Lo & Shyh-Chour Huang & Wei-Chen Wang, 2019. "Application of User Experience and Design Thinking to the Construction of a Class Assistance System for Hearing- and Speech-Impaired People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    6. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    7. Jianping Huang & Yuheng Tao & Minghong Shi & Jun Wu, 2022. "Empirical Study on Design Trend of Taiwan (1960s–2020): The Evolution of Theme, Diversity and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Makoza, Frank, 2023. "Analyzing policy change of Malawi ICT and Digitalization policy: Policy Assemblage Perspective," EconStor Preprints 273309, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Jurry Hatammimi, 2022. "Measuring the implementation of the design thinking concept in the creative industry:Study on the Culinary Subsector in Bandung City," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 4(2), pages 20-27, April.
    10. Klas Palm & Johan Lilja, 2021. "On the road to Agenda 2030 together in a complex alliance of Swedish public authorities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9564-9580, June.
    11. Serene Ho & Joep Crompvoets & Jantien Stoter, 2018. "3D Geo-Information Innovation in Europe’s Public Mapping Agencies: A Public Value Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, May.
    12. He-Hai Liu & Yu-Sheng Su, 2018. "Effects of Using Task-Driven Classroom Teaching on Students’ Learning Attitudes and Learning Effectiveness in an Information Technology Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Novak, David C. & Koliba, Chris & Zia, Asim & Tucker, Matt, 2015. "Evaluating the outcomes associated with an innovative change in a state-level transportation project prioritization process: A case study of Vermont," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 130-143.
    14. Nilssen, Maja, 2019. "To the smart city and beyond? Developing a typology of smart urban innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 98-104.
    15. Simon Hull & Jennifer Whittal, 2021. "Do Design Science Research and Design Thinking Processes Improve the ‘Fit’ of the Fit-For-Purpose Approach to Securing Land Tenure for All in South Africa?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Georgi V. Georgiev & Vijayakumar Nanjappan, 2023. "Sustainability Considerations in Digital Fabrication Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Tz-Heng Hsu & Gwo-Jiun Horng & Aaron Raymond See, 2021. "Change in Learning Motivation Observed through the Introduction of Design Thinking in a Mobile Application Programming Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Lars Fuglsang & Anne Vorre Hansen & Ines Mergel & Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk, 2021. "Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Sojeong Kim & Adam M. Wellstead & Tanya Heikkila, 2023. "Policy capacity and rise of data‐based policy innovation labs," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(3), pages 341-362, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7427-:d:841296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.