IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2649-d160423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Learning Effectiveness of Stanford Design Thinking in Integrated Design Education

Author

Listed:
  • Jui-Che Tu

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan)

  • Li-Xia Liu

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan
    Beijing Union University, Beijing 100023, China)

  • Kuan-Yi Wu

    (Department of Creative Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan)

Abstract

Due to industrial demand and the influence of government policies, the number of design colleges and students specializing in design in Taiwan has been increasing year by year. As a result, the topics on design education have gained great attention. To adapt to the rapidly-changing society, training that is designed to strengthen the professionalism and integration ability of those design majors should also be adjusted. Unlike traditional teaching methods, Stanford Design Thinking is a people-oriented problem-solving method. Proceeding from human needs, it offers creative solutions to various topics. Placing emphasis on integrated team communication and the cooperation and exchange among interdisciplinary talents, it is a new teaching model in response to the changes to the design environment. In this study, Stanford Design Thinking was introduced to the integrated design curriculum education as a creativity teaching strategy, and the action research method was adopted to explore the learning effectiveness of the design thinking method. According to the findings, the design thinking method can improve teaching; it can promote student participation through interview training in class during the Empathize stage; it offers substantial assistance to students in actual interviews; it reveals information about the demands of target groups, deepens students’ discussions on design-related topics, and creates a favorable atmosphere for teaching; it fosters a positive interaction between students and teachers and makes students more attentive in class. Inspired by this teaching method, students can independently seek product-testing objects to review their design concepts and develop a stronger motivation for self-learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jui-Che Tu & Li-Xia Liu & Kuan-Yi Wu, 2018. "Study on the Learning Effectiveness of Stanford Design Thinking in Integrated Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2649-:d:160423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer, 2012. "Design Thinking Research," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, edition 127, pages 1-11, Springer.
    2. Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer, 2012. "Design Thinking Research," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, edition 127, pages 1-10, Springer.
    3. Birgit Jobst & Eva Köppen & Tilmann Lindberg & Josephine Moritz & Holger Rhinow & Christoph Meinel, 2012. "The Faith-Factor in Design Thinking: Creative Confidence Through Education at the Design Thinking Schools Potsdam and Stanford?," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, edition 127, pages 35-46, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He-Hai Liu & Yu-Sheng Su, 2018. "Effects of Using Task-Driven Classroom Teaching on Students’ Learning Attitudes and Learning Effectiveness in an Information Technology Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Hartmut Derler & Simon Berner & Daniela Grach & Alfred Posch & Ulrike Seebacher, 2019. "Project-Based Learning in a Transinstitutional Research Setting: Case Study on the Development of Sustainable Food Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Georgi V. Georgiev & Vijayakumar Nanjappan, 2023. "Sustainability Considerations in Digital Fabrication Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2019. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Tz-Heng Hsu & Gwo-Jiun Horng & Aaron Raymond See, 2021. "Change in Learning Motivation Observed through the Introduction of Design Thinking in a Mobile Application Programming Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Jurry Hatammimi, 2022. "Measuring the implementation of the design thinking concept in the creative industry:Study on the Culinary Subsector in Bandung City," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 4(2), pages 20-27, April.
    7. Jih-Sheng Lo & Chi-Hung Lo & Shyh-Chour Huang & Wei-Chen Wang, 2019. "Application of User Experience and Design Thinking to the Construction of a Class Assistance System for Hearing- and Speech-Impaired People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Afred Suci & Sri Maryanti & Hardi Hardi & Nining Sudiar, 2022. "Embedding Design Thinking Paradigm in a University’s Business Assistance to Small Business," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 177-201, April.
    9. He-Hai Liu & Qi Wang & Yu-Sheng Su & Liang Zhou, 2019. "Effects of Project-Based Learning on Teachers’ Information Teaching Sustainability and Ability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. José Rodrigues & Carla Chicau Borrego & Paula Ruivo & Pedro Sobreiro & David Catela & José Amendoeira & Rui Matos, 2020. "Conceptual Framework for the Research on Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Yi-Chen Lai & Li-Hsun Peng, 2019. "Effective Teaching and Activities of Excellent Teachers for the Sustainable Development of Higher Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Jui-Che Tu & Xu Zhang & Xiu-Yue Zhang, 2021. "Basic Courses of Design Major Based on the ADDIE Model: Shed Light on Response to Social Trends and Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    13. Sohail Ahmed Soomro & Hernan Casakin & Georgi V. Georgiev, 2021. "Sustainable Design and Prototyping Using Digital Fabrication Tools for Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Gökhan Ilgaz & Menekşe Eskici, 2018. "Examination of Teacher Candidates’ Lifelong Learning Competence and Basic Motivation Resources as Parts of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Triyuth Promsiri & Krisakorn Sukavejworakit & Vasu Keerativutisest & Thanaphol Virasa & Krischanan Kampanthong, 2022. "Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jih-Sheng Lo & Chi-Hung Lo & Shyh-Chour Huang & Wei-Chen Wang, 2019. "Application of User Experience and Design Thinking to the Construction of a Class Assistance System for Hearing- and Speech-Impaired People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Renee Newman-Storen, 2014. "Leadership in Sustainability: Creating an Interface between Creativity and Leadership Theory in Dealing with “Wicked Problems”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Samir Patel & Khanjan Mehta, 2017. "Systems, Design, and Entrepreneurial Thinking: Comparative Frameworks," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 515-533, October.
    4. Ahmet Cengiz Ucar & Lutfihak Alpkan & Meral Elci, 2021. "The Effects of Person–Organization Fit and Turnover Intention on Employees’ Creative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Ownership," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    5. Shubashini Rathina Velu, 2022. "Design Thinking Approach for Increasing Innovative Action in Universities: ICT’s Mediating Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Mathias Lanezki & Catharina Siemer & Steffen Wehkamp, 2020. "“Changing the Game—Neighbourhood”: An Energy Transition Board Game, Developed in a Co-Design Process: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Julia Wells Novy & Banny Banerjee & Pamela Matson, 2021. "A Core Curriculum for Sustainability Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Laura Huang & Cristina B Gibson & Bradley L Kirkman & Debra L Shapiro, 2017. "When is traditionalism an asset and when is it a liability for team innovation? A two-study empirical examination," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(6), pages 693-715, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2649-:d:160423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.