IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4117-d783413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design Thinking and Urban Community Development: East Bangkok

Author

Listed:
  • Pattarachit Choompol Gozzoli

    (Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand)

  • Theerada Rongrat

    (Faculty of Architecture and Design, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand)

  • Roberto Bruno Gozzoli

    (Tourism and Hospitality Management Division, Mahidol University International College, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand)

Abstract

This research focuses on community development and ways in which community members can express their opinions and maintain well-being. However, in many contexts, these voices have been enfeebled through top-down approaches, lack of a concrete scenario, and attention to community problems, all of which are frequently associated with prejudices based on social status, education, or gender. For the first time within an urban context, the Ban Bu/Wat Suwannaram community in Bangkok, Thailand, has been given the opportunity to voice their opinions about the community, the direction it should take, and the overall improvement to be made, without the constriction of external authorities. This study applies design thinking, which despite being one of the major trends in business over the last couple of decades, is not generally used to address social issues. Since design thinking requires data collection and the creation of a model/prototype, two complementary procedures are employed. Firstly, the community is studied through observation and interviews, which helped creating a SWOT analysis to identify its potential and facilitate an informal discussion with members of the local community on the situation before urbanisation loosened community ties. After this initial stage, a prototype for various areas of community development is discussed in a community workshop to enable participants to offer their opinions on how the community could develop further. The results reveal the aspirations of the local community towards improving social and environmental issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Pattarachit Choompol Gozzoli & Theerada Rongrat & Roberto Bruno Gozzoli, 2022. "Design Thinking and Urban Community Development: East Bangkok," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4117-:d:783413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renu Sukharomana & Korakit Choomgrant, 2017. "Heritage Tourism and Vibrant Life of the Baan Lao Community, Chao Phraya River, Bangkok, Thailand," Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 6, pages 293-301.
    2. Supoj Prompayuk & Panayu Chairatananonda, 2017. "Historic Community Preservation: The Approach Suitable to Thai Context," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(11), pages 120-120, November.
    3. Wilawan Jansri, 2019. "Perception of Residents, Community Participation and Support for Tourism Development in the Old Town Muang Songkhla, Thailand," Proceedings of the 13th International RAIS Conference, June 10-11, 2019 07WJ, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    4. Hanan Alhaddi, 2015. "Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability: A Literature Review," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 6-10, September.
    5. Ilaria Rosetti & Clara Bertrand Cabral & Ana Pereira Roders & Marc Jacobs & Rosana Albuquerque, 2022. "Heritage and Sustainability: Regulating Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Siraprapa Panthong & Viriya Taecharungroj, 2021. "Which CSR Activities Are Preferred by Local Community Residents? Conjoint and Cluster Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Tao Shen & Chan Gao, 2020. "Sustainability in Community Building: Framing Design Thinking Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Amrita Daniere & Lois M. Takahashi & Anchana Naranong, 2002. "Social Capital, Networks, and Community Environments in Bangkok, Thailand," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 453-484, September.
    9. Leyden, K.M., 2003. "Social Capital and the Built Environment: The Importance of Walkable Neighborhoods," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1546-1551.
    10. Heyd, Helene & Neef, Andreas, 2004. "Participation of local people in water management: evidence from the Mae Sa Watershed, northern Thailand," EPTD discussion papers 128, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Daniere, Amrita G & Takahashi, Lois M, 1999. "Environmental Behavior in Bangkok, Thailand: A Portrait of Attitudes, Values, and Behavior," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(3), pages 525-557, April.
    12. Elvira Cicognani & Claudia Pirini & Corey Keyes & Mohsen Joshanloo & Reza Rostami & Masoud Nosratabadi, 2008. "Social Participation, Sense of Community and Social Well Being: A Study on American, Italian and Iranian University Students," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 97-112, October.
    13. Lee, Yok-Shiu F., 1998. "Intermediary institutions, community organizations, and urban environmental management: The case of three Bangkok slums," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 993-1011, June.
    14. Varameth Vichiensan & Vasinee Wasuntarasook & Yoshitsugu Hayashi & Masanobu Kii & Titipakorn Prakayaphun, 2021. "Urban Rail Transit in Bangkok: Chronological Development Review and Impact on Residential Property Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Onyinye Prince Choko & Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke & Stella Nwawulu Chiemela & Lenis Saweda O. Liverpool-Tasie & Louie Rivers, 2019. "A Resilience Approach to Community-Scale Climate Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianping Huang & Yuheng Tao & Minghong Shi & Jun Wu, 2022. "Empirical Study on Design Trend of Taiwan (1960s–2020): The Evolution of Theme, Diversity and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Triyuth Promsiri & Krisakorn Sukavejworakit & Vasu Keerativutisest & Thanaphol Virasa & Krischanan Kampanthong, 2022. "Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carpenter, Jeffrey P. & Daniere, Amrita G. & Takahashi, Lois M., 2004. "Cooperation, trust, and social capital in Southeast Asian urban slums," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 533-551, December.
    2. Jeffrey P. Carpenter & Amrita G. Daniere & Lois M. Takahashi, 2004. "Social Capital and Trust in South-east Asian Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 853-874, April.
    3. repec:osf:osfxxx:qmg76_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Marie-Claude Richard & Émélie Lavoie & Brendon Watters, 2023. "Validation of the French-Language Version of the Sense of Community Index-2," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    5. Cong Li & Yajuan Zhou & Manfei Wu & Jiayue Xu & Xin Fu, 2025. "Exploring Nonlinear Threshold Effects and Interactions Between Built Environment and Urban Vitality at the Block Level Using Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Katherine King, 2013. "Jane Jacobs and ‘The Need for Aged Buildings’: Neighbourhood Historical Development Pace and Community Social Relations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(12), pages 2407-2424, September.
    7. Letizia Tebaldi & Giuseppe Vignali, 2023. "Is it possible to quantify the current resilience level of an agri-food system? A review of the literature," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Bonatti, Luigi & Campiglio, Emanuele, 2013. "How can transportation policies affect growth? A theoretical analysis of the long-term effects of alternative mobility systems," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 528-540.
    9. Hunger, Tom & Arnold, Marlen Gabriele & Engesser, Sven & van den Boogaart, K. Gerald, 2024. "Integrating sustainability facets into the early stages of new product development - a critical review," OSF Preprints qmg76, Center for Open Science.
    10. Marquet, Oriol & Miralles-Guasch, Carme, 2015. "Neighbourhood vitality and physical activity among the elderly: The role of walkable environments on active ageing in Barcelona, Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 24-30.
    11. Bradley Bereitschaft, 2017. "Equity in Microscale Urban Design and Walkability: A Photographic Survey of Six Pittsburgh Streetscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Enayat Mirzaei & Dominique Mignot, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Mode Choice Decision for Utilitarian and Hedonic Trips: Evidence from Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Michał Jaśkiewicz & Tomasz Besta, 2016. "Polish Version of the Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS-Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Ana-Maria Comandaru (Andrei) & Adriana Paduraru (Horaicu), 2021. "Harmonization Of Environmental Management Accounting - Tool For Managing Economic Reconfiguration," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 181-200, October.
    16. Eun Jung Kim & Hyunjung Kim, 2020. "Neighborhood Walkability and Housing Prices: A Correlation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Camilla Salvatore & Silvia Biffignandi & Annamaria Bianchi, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Through Twitter: From Topic Model Analysis to Indexes Measuring Communication Characteristics," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1217-1248, December.
    18. Rosemary Hiscock & Pierpaolo Mudu & Matthias Braubach & Marco Martuzzi & Laura Perez & Clive Sabel, 2014. "Wellbeing Impacts of City Policies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-34, November.
    19. Hamidi, Shima & Zandiatashbar, Ahoura & Bonakdar, Ahmad, 2019. "The relationship between regional compactness and regional innovation capacity (RIC): Empirical evidence from a national study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 394-402.
    20. Troy D. Glover & Luke Moyer & Joe Todd & Taryn Graham, 2023. "Strengthening Social Ties While Walking the Neighbourhood?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 52-62.
    21. Maša Filipovič Hrast & Richard Sendi & Boštjan Kerbler, 2023. "Person–Environment Fit in Urban Neighbourhoods in Slovenia: Challenges and Coping Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4117-:d:783413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.