IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/wpaper/y2016v8i2p313-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Buy Or Not To Buy From The Internet: Reasons To Behave In A Certain Manner In An International Online Commerce Society

Author

Listed:
  • Oana TUGULEA

    () (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Al. I. Cuza University of Iasi)

  • Claudia BOBALCA

    () (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Al. I. Cuza University of Iasi)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify the most important reasons that drive young Romanian Internet users to buy or to avoid buying from the Internet and to investigate the differences in the reasoning between two groups of Internet users. The most important reasons to buy from the Internet, as selected by the buyers group, are aspects concerning physical and financial gains: “comfort ability” and “time saving” (easiness to place an order – physical gain) on one hand, and “advantageous price” (financial gains) on the other hand. By far, the most important reason to avoid Internet shopping, for both analysed groups was the “impossibility to touch and test the product”.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana TUGULEA & Claudia BOBALCA, 2016. "To Buy Or Not To Buy From The Internet: Reasons To Behave In A Certain Manner In An International Online Commerce Society," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8(2), pages 313-332, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2016:v:8:i:2:p:313-332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ceswp.uaic.ro/articles/CESWP2016_VIII2_TUG.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oana TUGULEA, 2014. "Discriminator Credibility Dimensions Of An Online Acquisition Website – An Analysis Of An International Construct On A Specific Romanian Target," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6(3), pages 103-116, September.
    2. Burnett, John J. & Dune, Patrick M., 1986. "An appraisal of the use of student subjects in marketing research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 329-343, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. Elango & Karen Paul & Sumit Kundu & Shishir Paudel, 2010. "Organizational Ethics, Individual Ethics, and Ethical Intentions in International Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(4), pages 543-561, December.
    2. repec:jes:wpaper:y:2014:v:6:p:181-200 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy, 2019. "Like student like manager? Using student subjects in managerial debiasing research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 347-376, April.
    4. Francisco J. Conejo & Lawrence F. Cunningham & Clifford E. Young, 2020. "Revisiting the Brand Luxury Index: new empirical evidence and future directions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 108-122, January.
    5. Joana César Machado & Beatriz Fonseca & Carla Martins, 2021. "Brand logo and brand gender: examining the effects of natural logo designs and color on brand gender perceptions and affect," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 152-170, March.
    6. Deborah Compeau & Barbara Marcolin & Helen Kelley & Chris Higgins, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects---A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1093-1109, December.
    7. Yoo, Boonghee & Donthu, Naveen, 2001. "Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Armstrong, J. Scott & Coviello, Nicole & Safranek, Barbara, 1993. "Escalation bias: does it extend to marketing?," MPRA Paper 81685, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Kumar, Bipul & Manrai, Ajay K. & Manrai, Lalita A., 2017. "Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Espinosa, Jennifer A. & Ortinau, David J., 2016. "Debunking legendary beliefs about student samples in marketing research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3149-3158.
    11. Yves Van Vaerenbergh & Simon Hazée & Annelies Costers, 2018. "Customer participation in service recovery: a meta-analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 465-483, December.
    12. Sung-Bum Kim & Ki-Joon Kwon, 2018. "Examining the Relationships of Image and Attitude on Visit Intention to Korea among Tanzanian College Students: The Moderating Effect of Familiarity," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Alvarez, Maria D. & Campo, Sara, 2014. "The influence of political conflicts on country image and intention to visit: A study of Israel's image," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 70-78.
    14. Sara Valentini & Chiara Orsingher & Alexandra Polyakova, 2020. "Customers’ emotions in service failure and recovery: a meta-analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 199-216, September.
    15. Oana Tugulea & Claudia Bobalca & Andreea Maha & Liviu-George Maha, 2014. "Using Internet And Travel Agencies In Planning A Trip. A Qualitative Approach," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6(1), pages 181-200, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Internet; online shopping; reasons to buy; reasons not to buy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2016:v:8:i:2:p:313-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alupului Ciprian). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.