IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jek/journl/v5y2017i2p33-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Usage Of Ict In Eu Culture Sector As A Tool Of Cultural Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Eva ARDIELLI

    (VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics, Department of Public Economics)

Abstract

Culture is not only an inherent part of human life but it also creates the potential for economic growth, employment and innovation. For this reason, the European Union considers the development of culture sector and Cultural and creative industries as very important. Nowadays the culture sector is confronted with the penetration of Information and communication technologies. The widespread use of Internet and Information and communication technologies implies more participatory behaviours on the side of users, who are increasingly involved in cultural activities electronically. The presented article is focused on the issue of electronic cultural participation in European Union member countries. The aim is to evaluate the usage of Information and communication technologies for cultural purpose. For the purpose of this aim the selected multi-criteria decision-making method MAPPAC is applied. In the result is presented the ranking of European Union member countries according to the participation of citizens in culture through Information and communication technologies. In the research there was confirmed the importance of Information and communication technologies in European Union culture sector. High involvement of individuals in electronic cultural participation is obvious in developed European Union countries; in less developed countries the electronic cultural participation is habitually lower.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva ARDIELLI, 2017. "Usage Of Ict In Eu Culture Sector As A Tool Of Cultural Participation," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 5(2), pages 33-46, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:jek:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:2:p:33-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ijek.org/files/IJEK_2-2017v5/IJEK-2-2017,v.5_ardielli,e..pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sibelle Diniz & Ana Machado, 2011. "Analysis of the consumption of artistic-cultural goods and services in Brazil," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 35(1), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Bertrand Mareschal & Jean Pierre Brans & Philippe Vincke, 1984. "Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9305, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Matarazzo, Benedetto, 1991. "as a compromise between outranking methods and," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 48-65, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfandari, Laurent, 2004. "Choice Rules with Size Constraints for Multiple Criteria Decision Making," ESSEC Working Papers DR 04002, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    2. Corrente, Salvatore & Figueira, José Rui & Greco, Salvatore, 2014. "The SMAA-PROMETHEE method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 514-522.
    3. Kadziński, MiŁosz & Greco, Salvatore & SŁowiński, Roman, 2012. "Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 488-501.
    4. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    5. Jelena Kilić Pamuković & Katarina Rogulj & Daniela Dumanić & Nikša Jajac, 2020. "A Sustainable Approach for the Maintenance of Asphalt Pavement Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Almoghathawi, Yasser & Barker, Kash & Rocco, Claudio M. & Nicholson, Charles D., 2017. "A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance identification and ranking of network components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 142-151.
    7. Ali Tlili & Oumaima Khaled & Vincent Mousseau & Wassila Ouerdane, 2023. "Interactive portfolio selection involving multicriteria sorting models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1169-1195, June.
    8. Elisabetta Lazzaro & Carlofilippo Frateschi, 2017. "Couples’ arts participation: assessing individual and joint time use," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(1), pages 47-69, February.
    9. Olivier Cailloux & Tommi Tervonen & Boris Verhaegen & François Picalausa, 2014. "A data model for algorithmic multiple criteria decision analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 77-94, June.
    10. Martina Kuncova & Jana Seknickova, 2022. "Two-stage weighted PROMETHEE II with results’ visualization," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 547-571, June.
    11. Greco, Salvatore, 1997. "A new PCCA method: IDRA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 587-601, May.
    12. Arévalo Quijada, Mª T. & Gómez Domínguez, D. & Vázquez Cueto, Mª J. & Zapata Reina, A., 2002. "Un estudio de las Cajas de Ahorros Andaluzas mediante el método multicriterio promethee," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 20, pages 5-27, Abril.
    13. Majda Ivić & Jelena Kilić & Katarina Rogulj & Nikša Jajac, 2020. "Decision Support to Sustainable Parking Management—Investment Planning through Parking Fines to Improve Pedestrian Flows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Olcer, A. I. & Odabasi, A. Y., 2005. "A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 93-114, October.
    15. Luiz Carlos Santana Ribeiro & Thiago Henrique Carneiro Rios Lopes & Amir Borges Ferreira Neto & Fernanda Rodrigues Santos, 2020. "Cultural employment growth in Brazilian municipalities," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(4), pages 605-624, December.
    16. Zohre Hoseinzade & Asal Zavarei & Kourosh Shirani, 2021. "Application of prediction–area plot in the assessment of MCDM methods through VIKOR, PROMETHEE II, and permutation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2489-2507, December.
    17. Imane Haddar & Brahim Raouyane & Mostafa Bellafkih, 2020. "Service Broker-Based Architecture Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Service Level Agreement," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Ardielli Eva, 2020. "Evaluation of eHealth Deployment at Primary Care in the EU Member States by Usage of Selected MCDM Methods," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 20(3), pages 337-359, September.
    19. Marasovic, Branka & Babic, Zoran, 2011. "Two-step multi-criteria model for selecting optimal portfolio," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 58-66, November.
    20. A. Psomas & I. Vryzidis & A. Spyridakos & M. Mimikou, 2021. "MCDA approach for agricultural water management in the context of water–energy–land–food nexus," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 689-723, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jek:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:2:p:33-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aleksandr Kljucnikov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vsposcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.