IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jculte/v49y2025i1d10.1007_s10824-024-09501-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of COVID-19 on cultural and arts activities: evidence from a large-scale micro-level survey in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Seonho Shin

    (Ajou University)

Abstract

Despite consensus in the literature regarding the importance of culture and arts, as well as their vulnerability to economic shocks, few empirical studies assess the degree to which they have been affected adversely by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study thus quantitatively measures the impact of COVID-19 on people’s cultural engagement in South Korea. Various econometric methods are applied to South Korea’s large-scale Culture and Arts Activity Survey dataset, which is nationally representative and provides micro-level detail. Results suggest that COVID-19 made South Korean people substantially and significantly less likely to participate in cultural and arts activities—by 15 to 17 percentage points for venue activities and 24 to 25 percentage points for outdoor activities. Strong heterogeneity, however, seems to exist depending on an individual’s gender, age, education, income, and early exposure to the arts. Interestingly, the pandemic rather raised people’s likelihood of visiting a library, which serves as a safer cultural outlet, and the number of movies watched through digital media increased. Remarkably, the results from quantile count regression suggest that frequent goers were more affected. However, there is preliminary evidence indicating an exception for ‘very frequent goers’ (highly engaged individuals at the 90th percentile level from the bottom) who may not have much compromised their consumption of culture and arts despite the challenging circumstances brought on by the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Seonho Shin, 2025. "The impact of COVID-19 on cultural and arts activities: evidence from a large-scale micro-level survey in South Korea," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(1), pages 193-229, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jculte:v:49:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10824-024-09501-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10824-024-09501-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10824-024-09501-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10824-024-09501-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Machado, Jose A.F. & Silva, J. M. C. Santos, 2005. "Quantiles for Counts," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 1226-1237, December.
    2. Seonho Shin, 2022. "To work or not? Wages or subsidies?: Copula-based evidence of subsidized refugees’ negative selection into employment," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 2209-2252, October.
    3. World Bank, 2020. "Global Economic Prospects, January 2020," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 33044, August.
    4. Jörg Rössel & Sebastian Weingartner, 2016. "Opportunities for cultural consumption: How is cultural participation in Switzerland shaped by regional cultural infrastructure?," Rationality and Society, , vol. 28(4), pages 363-385, November.
    5. Sibelle Diniz & Ana Machado, 2011. "Analysis of the consumption of artistic-cultural goods and services in Brazil," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 35(1), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Lee, Myoung-jae, 2005. "Micro-Econometrics for Policy, Program and Treatment Effects," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199267699, Decembrie.
    7. Victoria Ateca-Amestoy, 2008. "Determining heterogeneous behavior for theater attendance," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(2), pages 127-151, June.
    8. Francesca Borgonovi, 2004. "Performing arts attendance: an economic approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(17), pages 1871-1885.
    9. Seonho Shin, 2022. "Labor market impact of COVID‐19 on migrants in South Korea: Evidence from local outbreaks," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 229-260, September.
    10. Alfonso Miranda, 2008. "Planned fertility and family background: a quantile regression for counts analysis," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 67-81, January.
    11. Kirstin Hallmann & Cristina Muñiz Artime & Christoph Breuer & Sören Dallmeyer & Magnus Metz, 2017. "Leisure participation: modelling the decision to engage in sports and culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(4), pages 467-487, November.
    12. Daniel Wheatley & Craig Bickerton, 2017. "Subjective well-being and engagement in arts, culture and sport," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(1), pages 23-45, February.
    13. Marco Alderighi & Eleonora Lorenzini, 2012. "Cultural goods, cultivation of taste, satisfaction and increasing marginal utility during vacations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 36(1), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Charles Gray, 1998. "Hope for the Future? Early Exposure to the Arts and Adult Visits to Art Museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(2), pages 87-98, June.
    15. Mullahy, John, 1986. "Specification and testing of some modified count data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 341-365, December.
    16. World Bank, 2020. "Global Economic Prospects, June 2020," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 33748, August.
    17. Wei-Jen Wen & Tsung-Chi Cheng, 2013. "Performing arts attendance in Taiwan: who and how often?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 37(2), pages 309-325, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Suarez-Fernandez & Juan Prieto-Rodriguez & Maria Jose Perez-Villadoniga, 2020. "The changing role of education as we move from popular to highbrow culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(2), pages 189-212, June.
    2. Geng Chen & Pei Tang, 2021. "Similar but special: an econometric analysis of live performing arts attendance in mainland China," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 459-490, September.
    3. Michael Getzner, 2020. "Spatially Disaggregated Cultural Consumption: Empirical Evidence of Cultural Sustainability from Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Pascal Courty & Fenghua Zhang, 2018. "Cultural participation in major Chinese cities," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(4), pages 543-592, November.
    5. Kirstin Hallmann & Cristina Muñiz Artime & Christoph Breuer & Sören Dallmeyer & Magnus Metz, 2017. "Leisure participation: modelling the decision to engage in sports and culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(4), pages 467-487, November.
    6. Cristina Muñiz & Plácido Rodríguez & María José Suárez, 2017. "Participation in cultural activities: specification issues," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(1), pages 71-93, February.
    7. Marta Zieba, 2017. "Cultural participation of tourists – Evidence from travel habits of Austrian residents," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 295-315, March.
    8. Marvao, Catarina & Borowiecki, Karol, 2015. "Dance Participation and Attendance in Denmark," SITE Working Paper Series 33, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics.
    9. Victoria Ateca-Amestoy & Concetta Castiglione, 2016. "The consumption of cultural goods through the internet. How is it affected by the digital divide?," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-04-2016, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised May 2016.
    10. Elisabetta Lazzaro & Carlofilippo Frateschi, 2017. "Couples’ arts participation: assessing individual and joint time use," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(1), pages 47-69, February.
    11. Pablo De la Vega & Sara Suarez-Fernández & David Boto-García & Juan Prieto-Rodríguez, 2020. "Playing a play: online and live performing arts consumers profiles and the role of supply constraints," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(3), pages 425-450, September.
    12. Andrey David Ramos Ramírez & Nora Elena Espinal Monsalve, 2020. "Aplicación de modelos de elección discreta regularizados para el análisis de los determinantes del consumo cultural en Colombia: el caso de los bienes del patrimonio cultural [Aplicação de modelos reg," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 30(1), pages 37-68, January-A.
    13. Elisabetta Lazzaro & Carlofilippo Frateschi, 2015. "Couples' arts participation: assessing individual and joint time use," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/185658, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    14. Cuccia, Tiziana, 2009. "A Contingent Ranking Study on the Preferences of Tourists across Seasons/A Contingent Ranking Study on the Preferences of Tourists across Seasons," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 27, pages 161-176, Abril.
    15. Jesús Manuel De Sancha-Navarro & Juan Lara-Rubio & María Dolores Oliver-Alfonso & Luis Palma-Martos, 2021. "Cultural Sustainability in University Students’ Flamenco Music Event Attendance: A Neural Networks Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Gabriel Rodríguez-Puello & Victor Iturra, 2024. "Does a higher cultural supply raise cultural consumption? The association between individual and city traits and cultural consumption in Chile," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 72(1), pages 65-83, January.
    17. Masaki Katsuura, 2012. "Lead–lag relationship between household cultural expenditures and business cycles," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 36(1), pages 49-65, February.
    18. Victor Nyatefe & Mawussé Nézan Komlagan Okey, 2020. "Analyse de la consommation des biens culturels au Togo," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(1), pages 80-95, March.
    19. Carla Cristina Rosa de Almeida & João Policarpo Rodrigues Lima & Maria Fernanda Freire Gatto, 2020. "Expenditure on cultural events: preferences or opportunities? An analysis of Brazilian consumer data," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(3), pages 451-480, September.
    20. Georgios Papadopoulos, 2013. "Immigration Status and Victimization: Evidence from the British Crime Survey," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 042, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Culture and arts; COVID-19; Cultural economics; South Korea; Quantile count regression;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jculte:v:49:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10824-024-09501-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.