IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cue/wpaper/awp-04-2016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The consumption of cultural goods through the internet. How is it affected by the digital divide?

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Ateca-Amestoy

    (Department of Fundamentos del Análisis Económico II. University of the Basque Country. Avda. Lehendakari Aguire, 83. 48015, Bilbao (Spain))

  • Concetta Castiglione

    (Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via delle Belle Arti, 41 - 40126 Bologna (Italy))

Abstract

Cultural engagement through the internet is becoming a more popular way of cultural participation, as computers and mobile devices are the outlet for more cultural experiences. On the one hand, this may help to access a wider variety of cultural contents in the form of digital goods. On the other hand, the digital divide could further exacerbate the stratification of cultural consumption. Using data from the 2012 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts for the United States, we explain the determinants of cultural participation through digital engagement for highbrow and lowbrow cultural activities, explicitly accounting for the selection in the sample of internet users. Our results suggest different determinants of these two categories, especially for the role played by age and education.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Ateca-Amestoy & Concetta Castiglione, 2016. "The consumption of cultural goods through the internet. How is it affected by the digital divide?," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-04-2016, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised May 2016.
    • Handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-04-2016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.culturaleconomics.org/awp/AWP-04-2016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:pri:cpanda:wp15%20-%20dimaggio%2bhargittai is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Marta Zieba, 2009. "Full-income and price elasticities of demand for German public theatre," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 33(2), pages 85-108, May.
    3. Paul DiMaggio & Eszter Hargittai, 2001. "From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases," Working Papers 47, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    4. Victor Ginsburgh & David Throsby, 2006. "Handbook of the economics of art and culture," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/1673, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Godefroy Nguyen & Sylvain Dejean & François Moreau, 2014. "On the complementarity between online and offline music consumption: the case of free streaming," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(4), pages 315-330, November.
    6. Nicole Zillien & Eszter Hargittai, 2009. "Digital Distinction: Status‐Specific Types of Internet Usage," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(2), pages 274-291, June.
    7. Francesca Borgonovi, 2004. "Performing arts attendance: an economic approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(17), pages 1871-1885.
    8. Martin Peitz & Patrick Waelbroeck, 2005. "An Economist's Guide to Digital Music," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 51(2-3), pages 359-428.
    9. Trilce Navarrete, 2013. "Digital cultural heritage," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 12, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide, 2014. "ICTs and time-span in technical efficiency gains. A stochastic frontier approach over a panel of Italian manufacturing firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 55-65.
    11. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    12. Victoria Ateca-Amestoy, 2008. "Determining heterogeneous behavior for theater attendance," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(2), pages 127-151, June.
    13. Concetta Castiglione & Davide Infante, 2015. "Rational addiction and cultural goods: the case of the Italian theatregoer," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-03-2015, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised May 2015.
    14. A. Sisto & R. Zanola, 2010. "Cinema attendance in Europe," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 515-517.
    15. Godefroy Dang Nguyen & Sylvain Dejean & François Moreau, 2014. "On the complementarity between online and offline music consumption: the case of free streaming," Post-Print hal-00973159, HAL.
    16. Marco Alderighi & Eleonora Lorenzini, 2012. "Cultural goods, cultivation of taste, satisfaction and increasing marginal utility during vacations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 36(1), pages 1-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pablo De la Vega & Sara Suarez-Fernández & David Boto-García & Juan Prieto-Rodríguez, 2020. "Playing a play: online and live performing arts consumers profiles and the role of supply constraints," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(3), pages 425-450, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo De la Vega & Sara Suarez-Fernández & David Boto-García & Juan Prieto-Rodríguez, 2020. "Playing a play: online and live performing arts consumers profiles and the role of supply constraints," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(3), pages 425-450, September.
    2. Sibelle Diniz & Ana Machado, 2011. "Analysis of the consumption of artistic-cultural goods and services in Brazil," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 35(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Sara Suarez-Fernandez & Juan Prieto-Rodriguez & Maria Jose Perez-Villadoniga, 2020. "The changing role of education as we move from popular to highbrow culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(2), pages 189-212, June.
    4. Victoria Ateca-Amestoy & Concetta Castiglione, 2023. "Live and digital engagement with the visual arts," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 47(4), pages 643-692, December.
    5. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide, 2014. "The evolution of theatre attendance in Italy: patrons and companies," MPRA Paper 63301, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Mar 2015.
    6. Karol Jan Borowiecki & Trilce Navarrete, 2018. "Fiscal and economic aspects of book consumption in the European Union," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(2), pages 309-339, May.
    7. Caterina Adelaide Mauri & Alexander Wolf, 2016. "Household Decisions on Arts Consumption: How Men Can Avoid the Ballet," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2016-36, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. Michael Getzner, 2020. "Spatially Disaggregated Cultural Consumption: Empirical Evidence of Cultural Sustainability from Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    9. María Palma & Luis Palma & Luis Aguado, 2013. "Determinants of cultural and popular celebration attendance: the case study of Seville Spring Fiestas," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 37(1), pages 87-107, February.
    10. Trilce Navarrete & Karol J. Borowiecki, 2015. "Change in access after digitization: Ethnographic collections in Wikipedia," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-10-2015, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Oct 2015.
    11. Cristina Muñiz & Plácido Rodríguez & María José Suárez, 2017. "Participation in cultural activities: specification issues," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(1), pages 71-93, February.
    12. Luisa Fernanda Bernat & Jhon James Mora & Blanca Zuluaga, 2012. "La elasticidad ingreso del consumo cultural en Cali," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 14(27), pages 165-192, July-Dece.
    13. Geng Chen & Pei Tang, 2021. "Similar but special: an econometric analysis of live performing arts attendance in mainland China," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 459-490, September.
    14. Concetta Castiglione, 2011. "The Demand for Theatre. A Microeconomic Approach to the Italian Case," Trinity Economics Papers tep0911, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    15. Marta Zieba, 2017. "Cultural participation of tourists – Evidence from travel habits of Austrian residents," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 295-315, March.
    16. Caterina Adelaide Mauri & Alexander Friedrich Wolf, 2021. "Battle of the ballet household decisions on arts consumption," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 359-383, September.
    17. Victor Nyatefe & Mawussé Nézan Komlagan Okey, 2020. "Analyse de la consommation des biens culturels au Togo," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(1), pages 80-95, March.
    18. Junlong Wu & Keshen Jiang & Chaoqing Yuan, 2019. "Determinants of demand for traditional Chinese opera," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 2129-2148, December.
    19. Muñiz, Cristina & Rodríguez, Plácido & Suárez, María J., 2014. "Sports and cultural habits by gender: An application using count data models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 288-297.
    20. Wei-Jen Wen & Tsung-Chi Cheng, 2013. "Performing arts attendance in Taiwan: who and how often?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 37(2), pages 309-325, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cultural participation; digital engagement; interne cultural consumption; selection; Heckman selection probit model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-04-2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Juan Prieto-Rodriguez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aceiiea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.