Is Economic Freedom One Dimensional? A Factor Analysis of Some Common Measures of Economic Freedom
The present paper investigates whether popular measures of economic freedom used in regression analyses by development economists and others are one dimensional. Using the indices provided by the Fraser Institute, Heritage/Wall Street Journal, and Heritage and Freedom House, a principal component analysis indicates that all of the indices above perform about as well as the statistically best single index, and in every case the percentage of total variance explained could be improved by using several principal components. Because the components of the indices are orthogonal, this could be done without multicollinearity problems in regression equations. In sum, the results indicate that economic freedom is not one dimensional and that efforts to squeeze so much into a single index results in lost information and a mis-ranking of the economic freedom of many developing countries.
Volume (Year): 25 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.jed.or.kr/|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Smith, Adam, 1776. "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number smith1776.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jed:journl:v:25:y:2000:i:1:p:17-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Changhui Kang)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.