IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jaf/journl/v14y2023i1n679.html

Contingency factors and choice of management control tools in small and medium-sized enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Estelle NOUDOHOUENOU

Abstract

Purpose : The objective of this study is to measure the influence of the ethnicity of the SME manager in the relationship: contingency factors and choice of management control tools in small and medium-sized enterprises. \n Method : To achieve this objective, a mixed approach is adopted. The qualitative phase relates to 30 interviews and the quantitative phase to a convenience sample of 650 SMEs in Benin. \n Results : The results highlighted a positive and significant effect between the environment, computerization and decision-making style variables in relation to the choice of management control tools. The results also showed that relations with people of the same ethnicity do not provide any role of moderation in the link between environment, computerization of the SME and the choice of management control tools. \n Originality : The originality of this study is the introduction of the socio-cultural ethnicity factor in management control.

Suggested Citation

  • Estelle NOUDOHOUENOU, 2023. "Contingency factors and choice of management control tools in small and medium-sized enterprises," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 14(1), pages 2-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jaf:journl:v:14:y:2023:i:1:n:679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scientific-society.com/AF/article/view/679
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chapman, Christopher S., 1997. "Reflections on a contingent view of accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 189-205, February.
    2. Chibani Ltaief, Faten & Henchiri, jamel E., 2016. "La structure financière des entreprises familiales : une analyse fondée sur la théorie du Pecking Order [The financial structure of family businesses: An analysis based on the Pecking Order theory]," MPRA Paper 76784, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Gordon, Lawrence A. & Miller, Danny, 1976. "A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 59-69, January.
    4. faten CHIBANI LTAIEF & jamel Eddine HENCHIRI, 2016. "La structure financière des entreprises familiales : une analyse fondée sur la théorie du Pecking Order," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 7(2), pages 84-97, November.
    5. Philippe Chapellier, 1997. "Profils de dirigeants et données comptables de gestion en PME," Post-Print hal-02438785, HAL.
    6. Bruns, Wj & Waterhouse, Jh, 1975. "Budgetary Control And Organization Structure," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(2), pages 177-203.
    7. repec:jaf:journl:v:7:y:2016:i:2:n:63 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:jaf:journl:v:14:y:2023:i:1:n:563 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Reid, Gavin C. & Smith, Julia A., 2009. "A coevolutionary analysis of organisational systems and processes: Quantitative applications to information system dynamics in small entrepreneurial firms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 762-781.
    3. Christophe Germain, 2003. "Le " Unbalanced Scorecard " Ou L'Analyse De La Differenciation Des Systemes De Mesure De La Performance," Post-Print halshs-00582778, HAL.
    4. Ewelina ZARZYCKA & Justyna DOBROSZEK & Cristina CIRCA & Alina ALMASAN, 2017. "The perceived suitability of management accounting information: a contingency based investigation," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 15(147), pages 395-395.
    5. Christophe Germain, 2004. "La contingence des systèmes de mesure de la performance : les résultats d’une recherche empirique sur le secteur des PME," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 7(1), pages 33-52, March.
    6. Adel Elgharbawy & Magdy Abdel-Kader, 2013. "Enterprise governance and value-based management: a theoretical contingency framework," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 99-129, February.
    7. Bouwens, Jan & Abernethy, Margaret A., 2000. "The consequences of customization on management accounting system design," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 221-241, April.
    8. Christophe Germain, 2004. "La contingence des systèmes de mesure de la performance : les résultats d'une recherche empirique sur le secteur des PME," Post-Print hal-00765242, HAL.
    9. Annukka Jokipii, 2010. "Determinants and consequences of internal control in firms: a contingency theory based analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(2), pages 115-144, May.
    10. Hartmann, Frank G. H., 2000. "The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 451-482, May.
    11. Gerdin, Jonas, 2005. "Management accounting system design in manufacturing departments: an empirical investigation using a multiple contingencies approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 99-126, February.
    12. Francesca Francioli & Alberto Quagli, 2021. "Management accounting change and the rise of Vespa (1884-1965)," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 2), pages 313-338.
    13. Solabomi Omobola Ajibolade, Ph.D, FCA, FIMLS, ACTI, 2013. "Drivers of Choice of Management Accounting System Designs in Nigerian Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(9), pages 45-57, July.
    14. Carla Mendoza & Pierre-Laurent Bescos, 2001. "An explanatory model of managers' information needs: implications for management accounting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 257-289.
    15. repec:jaf:journl:v:11:y:2020:i:2:n:312 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Arnold, Markus & Artz, Martin, 2019. "The use of a single budget or separate budgets for planning and performance evaluation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 50-67.
    17. Guilding, Chris, 1999. "Competitor-focused accounting: an exploratory note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 583-595, October.
    18. Adrien Bonache & Philippe Chapellier & Zouhour Ben Hamadi & Abdallah Mohammed, 2015. "Determinants of the complexity of accounting information systems of managers of SMEs: cultural contingencies and endogeneity [Los factores determinantes de la complejidad de los sistemas de información contables de los dirigentes de PYMES: conting," Post-Print halshs-01288141, HAL.
    19. Davila, Tony, 2005. "An exploratory study on the emergence of management control systems: formalizing human resources in small growing firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 223-248, April.
    20. Wamba Berthelo KUEDA & Kouakep Kouakep Olive Stéphanie & Kountelejouo Kountelejouo Laguarta Carine & Nongni Nongni Clodiane Léa & Kakti Kakti Ngueumeleu Gisèle, 2020. "strategic decision-making process in family businesses in Cameroon," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 11(2), pages 242-259, December.
    21. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    22. Ionel Bostan & Aliona Bîrcă & Viorel Țurcanu & Christiana Brigitte Sandu, 2018. "Systemic Approach to Management Control through Determining Factors," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • N8 - Economic History - - Micro-Business History
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jaf:journl:v:14:y:2023:i:1:n:679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oussama Quentin Kasseh (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/urredtn.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.