IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v11y2019i2p75-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting Clean Technology Adoption: To Subsidize Products or Service Infrastructure?Abstract: We study the dynamic adoption process of clean-technology products (e.g., electric vehicles and solar photovoltaic panels), which is often hampered by the chicken-and-egg dilemma: at the early stage of commercialization, firms are reluctant to invest in service infrastructure before sufficient consumers adopt the products; on the other hand, consumers hesitate to adopt the products without such infrastructure. We examine two forms of government subsidies (as well as their combination) that aim to overcome this dilemma, namely service infrastructure subsidy and product subsidy. Although our analysis shows that both types of subsidies are generally conducive to clean technology adoption, it also reveals an interesting result: both infrastructure subsidy and product subsidy can be detrimental under certain conditions. In particular, the former may cause early adopters to delay their purchase, and the latter may interfere with the firm’s investment incentives and lead to reduced overall adoption. As a policy guideline, we find that the optimal subsidy strategy follows a “sandwich rule,” in that it is optimal to provide only the product subsidy when the deployment cost is sufficiently high or sufficiently low; however, if the cost falls in the moderate range, it is optimal to subsidize both

Author

Listed:
  • Guangrui Ma

    (Supply Chain Platform Division, Alibaba Group, Hangzhou 311121, China;)

  • Michael K. Lim

    (SNU Business School, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826 South Korea;)

  • Ho-Yin Mak

    (Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, United Kingdom;)

  • Zhixi Wan

    (Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangrui Ma & Michael K. Lim & Ho-Yin Mak & Zhixi Wan, 2019. "Promoting Clean Technology Adoption: To Subsidize Products or Service Infrastructure?Abstract: We study the dynamic adoption process of clean-technology products (e.g., electric vehicles and solar pho," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 75-95, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:75-95
    DOI: 10.1287/serv.2019.0238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2019.0238
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/serv.2019.0238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2013. "Infrastructure Planning for Electric Vehicles with Battery Swapping," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(7), pages 1557-1575, July.
    2. Vishal V. Agrawal & Ioannis Bellos, 2017. "The Potential of Servicizing as a Green Business Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1545-1562, May.
    3. Vishal V. Agrawal & Mark Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay & Valerie M. Thomas, 2012. "Is Leasing Greener Than Selling?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 523-533, March.
    4. Laura J. Kornish, 2001. "Pricing for a Durable-Goods Monopolist Under Rapid Sequential Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(11), pages 1552-1561, November.
    5. Terry A. Taylor & Wenqiang Xiao, 2014. "Subsidizing the Distribution Channel: Donor Funding to Improve the Availability of Malaria Drugs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2461-2477, October.
    6. Michael K. Lim & Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong, 2015. "Toward Mass Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Impact of the Range and Resale Anxieties," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 101-119, February.
    7. Xuanming Su & Fuqiang Zhang, 2008. "Strategic Customer Behavior, Commitment, and Supply Chain Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1759-1773, October.
    8. Buket Avci & Karan Girotra & Serguei Netessine, 2015. "Electric Vehicles with a Battery Switching Station: Adoption and Environmental Impact," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 772-794, April.
    9. Scott K. Shriver, 2015. "Network Effects in Alternative Fuel Adoption: Empirical Analysis of the Market for Ethanol," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 78-97, January.
    10. Sreekumar R. Bhaskaran & Stephen M. Gilbert, 2005. "Selling and Leasing Strategies for Durable Goods with Complementary Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1278-1290, August.
    11. Anirudh Dhebar, 1994. "Durable-Goods Monopolists, Rational Consumers, and Improving Products," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 100-120.
    12. Wenbin Wang & Mark E. Ferguson & Shanshan Hu & Gilvan C. Souza, 2013. "Dynamic Capacity Investment with Two Competing Technologies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 616-629, October.
    13. Bulow, Jeremy I, 1982. "Durable-Goods Monopolists," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 90(2), pages 314-332, April.
    14. Maxime C. Cohen & Ruben Lobel & Georgia Perakis, 2016. "The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1235-1258, May.
    15. Bryan Bollinger & Kenneth Gillingham, 2012. "Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 900-912, November.
    16. Saed Alizamir & Francis de Véricourt & Peng Sun, 2016. "Efficient Feed-In-Tariff Policies for Renewable Energy Technologies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 52-66, February.
    17. Stephen M. Gilbert & Sreelata Jonnalagedda, 2011. "Durable Products, Time Inconsistency, and Lock-in," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1655-1670, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Qiaozhen & He, Qiao-Chu & Chen, Ying-Ju & Huang, Wei, 2021. "Poverty mitigation via solar panel adoption: Smart contracts and targeted subsidy design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Bhavani Shanker Uppari & Ioana Popescu & Serguei Netessine, 2019. "Selling Off-Grid Light to Liquidity-Constrained Consumers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 308-326, May.
    3. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Jose A. Guajardo & Zhe Zhang, 2021. "Business Models in the Sharing Economy: Manufacturing Durable Goods in the Presence of Peer-to-Peer Rental Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1450-1469, December.
    4. Vishal Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Sezer Ülkü, 2021. "Leasing, Modularity, and the Circular Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6782-6802, November.
    5. Li, Kate J. & Xu, Susan H., 2015. "The comparison between trade-in and leasing of a product with technology innovations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 134-146.
    6. Kanatlı, Mehmet Ali & Karaer, Özgen, 2022. "Servitization as an alternative business model and its implications on product durability, profitability & environmental impact," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 546-560.
    7. Mei Lin & Xiajun Amy Pan & Quan Zheng, 2020. "Platform Pricing with Strategic Buyers: The Impact of Future Production Cost," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1122-1144, May.
    8. Li, Jin & Shi, Victor, 2019. "The benefit of horizontal decentralization in durable good procurement," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 13-23.
    9. Sreekumar R. Bhaskaran & Stephen M. Gilbert, 2009. "Implications of Channel Structure for Leasing or Selling Durable Goods," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 918-934, 09-10.
    10. Jiayi Joey Yu & Christopher S. Tang & Musen Kingsley Li & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2022. "Coordinating Installation of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations between Governments and Automakers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 681-696, February.
    11. Lingling Shi & Suresh P. Sethi & Metin Çakanyıldırım, 2022. "Promoting electric vehicles: Reducing charging inconvenience and price via station and consumer subsidies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4333-4350, December.
    12. Li, Kunpeng & Wang, Lan, 2023. "Optimal electric vehicle subsidy and pricing decisions with consideration of EV anxiety and EV preference in green and non-green consumers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Jia, Kunhao & Liao, Xiuwu & Feng, Juan, 2018. "Selling or leasing? Dynamic pricing of software with upgrades," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1044-1061.
    14. Hossein Abouee‐Mehrizi & Opher Baron & Oded Berman & David Chen, 2021. "Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Car Sharing Market," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 190-209, January.
    15. Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan & Chakraborty, Abhishek & Mandal, Prasenjit, 2021. "Promoting electric vehicle adoption: Who should invest in charging infrastructure?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Hao, Zhaowei & Qi, Wei & Gong, Tianxiao & Chen, Lihua & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2019. "Innovation uncertainty, new product press timing and strategic consumers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 122-135.
    17. Sreekumar R. Bhaskaran & Stephen M. Gilbert, 2005. "Selling and Leasing Strategies for Durable Goods with Complementary Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1278-1290, August.
    18. Srivastava, Abhishek & Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan & Chakraborty, Abhishek & Mateen, Arqum & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan, 2022. "Design and selection of government policies for electric vehicles adoption: A global perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Liu, Jingchen & Zhai, Xin & Chen, Lihua, 2018. "The interaction between product rollover strategy and pricing scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 116-135.
    20. Gu, Huaying & Liu, Zhixue & Qing, Qiankai, 2017. "Optimal electric vehicle production strategy under subsidy and battery recycling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 579-589.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:75-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.