IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v70y2022i2p918-962.html

Robust Learning of Consumer Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Yifan Feng

    (National University of Singapore Business School, Singapore 119245, Singapore)

  • René Caldentey

    (Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

  • Christopher Thomas Ryan

    (Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z2, Canada)

Abstract

This paper studies a class of ranking and selection problems faced by a company that wants to identify the most preferred product out of a finite set of alternatives when consumer preferences are a priori unknown. The only information available is that consumer preferences satisfy two key properties: (i) they are consistent with some unknown true ranking of the alternatives, and (ii) they are strict, namely, no two products are equally preferred. To learn the unknown ranking, the company is able to sample consumer preferences by sequentially showing different subsets of products to different consumers and asking them to report their top preference within the displayed set. The objective of the company is to design a display policy that minimizes the expected number of samples needed to identify the top-ranked product with high probability. We prove an instance-specific lower bound on the sample complexity of any policy that identifies the top-ranked product within a given (probabilistic) confidence. We also propose a robust formulation of the company’s problem and derive a sampling policy (myopic tracking policy), which is both worst-case asymptotically optimal and intuitive to implement. Roughly speaking, the myopic tracking policy randomly alternates between two extreme types of displaying strategies: (i) full display , which shows a consumer the entire menu so as to learn something about every product, and (ii) pair display , which shows a consumer only two products so as to maximize the informativeness of the choice made by the consumer. To assess the performance of our proposed myopic tracking policy, we conduct a comprehensive set of computational studies and compare it to alternative methods in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Yifan Feng & René Caldentey & Christopher Thomas Ryan, 2022. "Robust Learning of Consumer Preferences," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 918-962, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:2:p:918-962
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.2157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2157
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2021.2157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felipe Caro & Jérémie Gallien, 2007. "Dynamic Assortment with Demand Learning for Seasonal Consumer Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 276-292, February.
    2. Gilles Stoltz & Sébastien Bubeck & Rémi Munos, 2011. "Pure exploration in finitely-armed and continuous-armed bandits," Post-Print hal-00609550, HAL.
    3. Antoine Désir & Vineet Goyal & Srikanth Jagabathula & Danny Segev, 2021. "Mallows-Smoothed Distribution over Rankings Approach for Modeling Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 1206-1227, July.
    4. Young, H. P., 1988. "Condorcet's Theory of Voting," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 82(4), pages 1231-1244, December.
    5. Ali, Alnur & Meilă, Marina, 2012. "Experiments with Kemeny ranking: What works when?," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 28-40.
    6. Jonathan Levin & Barry Nalebuff, 1995. "An Introduction to Vote-Counting Schemes," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 3-26, Winter.
    7. Daniel Russo, 2020. "Simple Bayesian Algorithms for Best-Arm Identification," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1625-1647, November.
    8. Anke van Zuylen & David P. Williamson, 2009. "Deterministic Pivoting Algorithms for Constrained Ranking and Clustering Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 594-620, August.
    9. Paat Rusmevichientong & Zuo-Jun Max Shen & David B. Shmoys, 2010. "Dynamic Assortment Optimization with a Multinomial Logit Choice Model and Capacity Constraint," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1666-1680, December.
    10. Yan Huang & Param Vir Singh & Kannan Srinivasan, 2014. "Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas Under Consumer Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2138-2159, September.
    11. Irène Charon & Olivier Hudry, 2010. "An updated survey on the linear ordering problem for weighted or unweighted tournaments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 107-158, March.
    12. Martin Grötschel & Michael Jünger & Gerhard Reinelt, 1984. "A Cutting Plane Algorithm for the Linear Ordering Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 1195-1220, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Alos Ferrer & Michele Garagnani, 2025. "Who Likes It More?," Working Papers 424225030, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    2. Ningyuan Chen & Ming Hu, 2023. "Frontiers in Service Science: Data-Driven Revenue Management: The Interplay of Data, Model, and Decisions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 79-91, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noelia Rico & Camino R. Vela & Raúl Pérez-Fernández & Irene Díaz, 2021. "Reducing the Computational Time for the Kemeny Method by Exploiting Condorcet Properties," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Kohei Kawaguchi, 2021. "When Will Workers Follow an Algorithm? A Field Experiment with a Retail Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1670-1695, March.
    3. Li Chen & Adam J.Mersereau & Zhe (Frank) Wang, 2017. "Optimal Merchandise Testing with Limited Inventory," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 968-991, August.
    4. Andrea Aveni & Ludovico Crippa & Giulio Principi, 2024. "On the Weighted Top-Difference Distance: Axioms, Aggregation, and Approximation," Papers 2403.15198, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    5. Victor F. Araman & René A. Caldentey, 2022. "Diffusion Approximations for a Class of Sequential Experimentation Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5958-5979, August.
    6. Felipe Caro & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz & Paat Rusmevichientong, 2014. "The Assortment Packing Problem: Multiperiod Assortment Planning for Short-Lived Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2701-2721, November.
    7. Arnoud V. den Boer & Boxiao Chen & Yining Wang, 2024. "Pricing and Positioning of Horizontally Differentiated Products with Incomplete Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(6), pages 2446-2466, November.
    8. Akbari, Sina & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2023. "Beyond kemeny rank aggregation: A parameterizable-penalty framework for robust ranking aggregation with ties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Shipra Agrawal & Vashist Avadhanula & Vineet Goyal & Assaf Zeevi, 2019. "MNL-Bandit: A Dynamic Learning Approach to Assortment Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1453-1485, September.
    10. Arhami, Omid & Aslani, Shirin & Talebian, Masoud, 2024. "Dynamic assortment planning and capacity allocation with logit substitution," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Fernando Bernstein & A. Gürhan Kök & Lei Xie, 2015. "Dynamic Assortment Customization with Limited Inventories," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 538-553, October.
    12. Yiyun Luo & Will Wei Sun & Yufeng Liu, 2026. "Rate-Optimal Online Learning for Dynamic Assortment Selection with Positioning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(1), pages 224-242, January.
    13. Xi Chen & Yining Wang & Yuan Zhou, 2021. "Optimal Policy for Dynamic Assortment Planning Under Multinomial Logit Models," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 1639-1657, November.
    14. Xi Chen & Akshay Krishnamurthy & Yining Wang, 2024. "Robust Dynamic Assortment Optimization in the Presence of Outlier Customers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 999-1015, May.
    15. Azzini, Ivano & Munda, Giuseppe, 2020. "A new approach for identifying the Kemeny median ranking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 388-401.
    16. Manuel V. C. Vieira, 2024. "A linear ordering problem with weighted rank," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Rico, Noelia & Vela, Camino R. & Díaz, Irene, 2023. "Reducing the time required to find the Kemeny ranking by exploiting a necessary condition for being a winner," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1323-1336.
    18. Fernando Bernstein & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2017. "Dynamic Product Rotation in the Presence of Strategic Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2092-2107, July.
    19. Fernando Bernstein & Sajad Modaresi & Denis Sauré, 2019. "A Dynamic Clustering Approach to Data-Driven Assortment Personalization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2095-2115, May.
    20. Xi Chen & Yining Wang & Yuan Zhou, 2018. "Dynamic Assortment Optimization with Changing Contextual Information," Papers 1810.13069, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:2:p:918-962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.