IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v54y2006i5p829-846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Chemotherapy Scheduling Using Local Search Heuristics

Author

Listed:
  • Zvia Agur

    (Institute for Medical Biomathematics, 10 Ha'Teena Street, P.O.B. 282, 60991 Bene-Ataroth, Israel, and Optimata Ltd., 11 Tuval Street, Ramat Gan 52522, Israel)

  • Refael Hassin

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel)

  • Sigal Levy

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel, and The Academic College of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo, 4 Antokolsky Street, Tel Aviv 61161, Israel)

Abstract

We develop a method for computing efficient patient-specific drug protocols. Using this method, we identify two general categories of anticancer drug protocols, depending on the temporal cycle parameters of the host and cancer cells: a one-time intensive treatment, or a series of nonintensive treatments. Our method is based on a theoretical and experimental work showing that treatment efficacy can be improved by determining the dosing frequency on the drug-susceptible target and host cell-cycle parameters. Simulating the patient's pharmaco-dynamics in a simple model for cell population growth, we calculate the number of drug susceptible cells at every moment of therapy. Local search heuristics are then used to conduct a search for the desired solution, as defined by our criteria. These criteria include the patient's state at the end of a predetermined time period, the number of cancer and host cells at the end of treatment, and the time to the patient's cure. The process suggested here does not depend on the exact biological assumptions of the model, thus enabling its use in a more complex description of the system. We test three solution methods. Simulated annealing is compared to threshold acceptance and old bachelor acceptance, which are less known variants to this method. The conclusions concerning the three approximation methods are that good results can be achieved by choosing the proper parameters for each of the methods, but the computational effort required for achieving good results is much greater in simulated annealing than in the other methods. Also, a large number of iterations does not guarantee better solution quality, and resources would be better used in several short searches with different parameter values than in one long search.

Suggested Citation

  • Zvia Agur & Refael Hassin & Sigal Levy, 2006. "Optimizing Chemotherapy Scheduling Using Local Search Heuristics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 829-846, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:54:y:2006:i:5:p:829-846
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1060.0320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1060.0320
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1060.0320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David S. Johnson & Cecilia R. Aragon & Lyle A. McGeoch & Catherine Schevon, 1989. "Optimization by Simulated Annealing: An Experimental Evaluation; Part I, Graph Partitioning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 865-892, December.
    2. T. C. Hu & Andrew B. Kahng & Chung-Wen Albert Tsao, 1995. "Old Bachelor Acceptance: A New Class of Non-Monotone Threshold Accepting Methods," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 417-425, November.
    3. Unknown, 2005. "Forward," 2005 Conference: Slovenia in the EU - Challenges for Agriculture, Food Science and Rural Affairs, November 10-11, 2005, Moravske Toplice, Slovenia 183804, Slovenian Association of Agricultural Economists (DAES).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sera Kahruman & Elif Ulusal & Sergiy Butenko & Illya Hicks & Kathleen Diehl, 2012. "Scheduling the adjuvant endocrine therapy for early stage breast cancer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 683-705, July.
    2. Özge Karanfil & Yaman Barlas, 2008. "A Dynamic Simulator for the Management of Disorders of the Body Water Homeostasis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1474-1492, December.
    3. Natalie Kronik & Yuri Kogan & Moran Elishmereni & Karin Halevi-Tobias & Stanimir Vuk-Pavlović & Zvia Agur, 2010. "Predicting Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy by Personalized Mathematical Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Jinghua Shi & Oguzhan Alagoz & Fatih Erenay & Qiang Su, 2014. "A survey of optimization models on cancer chemotherapy treatment planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 331-356, October.
    5. Xiuxian Wang & Na Geng & Jianxin Qiu & Zhibin Jiang & Liping Zhou, 2020. "Markov model and meta-heuristics combined method for cost-effectiveness analysis," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 213-235, March.
    6. repec:plo:pcbi00:1002206 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucio Bianco & Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani & Veronica Piccialli, 2016. "A Game-Theoretic Approach for Regulating Hazmat Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 424-438, May.
    2. Federica Ricca & Andrea Scozzari & Bruno Simeone, 2013. "Political Districting: from classical models to recent approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 271-299, April.
    3. Burke, Edmund K. & Bykov, Yuri, 2017. "The late acceptance Hill-Climbing heuristic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 70-78.
    4. Pilar Lopez-Llompart & G. Mathias Kondolf, 2016. "Encroachments in floodways of the Mississippi River and Tributaries Project," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 513-542, March.
    5. Michelle Sheran Sylvester, 2007. "The Career and Family Choices of Women: A Dynamic Analysis of Labor Force Participation, Schooling, Marriage and Fertility Decisions," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 10(3), pages 367-399, July.
    6. DAVID M. BLAU & WILBERT van der KLAAUW, 2013. "What Determines Family Structure?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 579-604, January.
    7. Afanasyev, Dmitriy O. & Fedorova, Elena A. & Popov, Viktor U., 2015. "Fine structure of the price–demand relationship in the electricity market: Multi-scale correlation analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 215-226.
    8. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    9. Billio, Monica & Casarin, Roberto & Osuntuyi, Anthony, 2016. "Efficient Gibbs sampling for Markov switching GARCH models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 37-57.
    10. Jan Babecký & Fabrizio Coricelli & Roman Horváth, 2009. "Assessing Inflation Persistence: Micro Evidence on an Inflation Targeting Economy," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 59(2), pages 102-127, June.
    11. Lloyd, S. P., 2017. "Unconventional Monetary Policy and the Interest Rate Channel: Signalling and Portfolio Rebalancing," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1735, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. Ichiro Fukunaga, 2007. "Imperfect Common Knowledge, Staggered Price Setting, and the Effects of Monetary Policy," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(7), pages 1711-1739, October.
    13. Albertazzi, Ugo & Gambacorta, Leonardo, 2009. "Bank profitability and the business cycle," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 393-409, December.
    14. Beck, Thorsten & Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli & Merrouche, Ouarda, 2013. "Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 433-447.
    15. Jinho Bae & Chang-Jin Kim & Dong Kim, 2012. "The evolution of the monetary policy regimes in the U.S," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 617-649, October.
    16. McMahon, Rob, 2020. "Co-developing digital inclusion policy and programming with indigenous partners: Interventions from Canada," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26.
    17. George W. Evans & Seppo Honkapohja, 2009. "Robust Learning Stability with Operational Monetary Policy Rules," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel & Carl E. Walsh & Norman Loayza (Series Editor) & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel (Series (ed.),Monetary Policy under Uncertainty and Learning, edition 1, volume 13, chapter 5, pages 145-170, Central Bank of Chile.
    18. Lehtonen, Heikki & Kujala, Sanna, 2007. "Climate change impacts on crop risks and agricultural production in Finland," 101st Seminar, July 5-6, 2007, Berlin Germany 9259, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Michael Pomerleano, 2011. "Developing Regional Financial Markets – the Case of East Asia," Chapters, in: Ulrich Volz (ed.), Regional Integration, Economic Development and Global Governance, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Gary Charness & Francesco Feri & Miguel A. Meléndez-Jiménez & Matthias Sutter, 2023. "An Experimental Study on the Effects of Communication, Credibility, and Clustering in Network Games," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(6), pages 1530-1543, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    health care: treatment;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:54:y:2006:i:5:p:829-846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.