IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i2p691-706.html

AI and Procurement

Author

Listed:
  • Ruomeng Cui

    (Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322)

  • Meng Li

    (Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204)

  • Shichen Zhang

    (Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

Abstract

Problem definition : In this research, we study how buyers’ use of artificial intelligence (AI) affects suppliers’ price quoting strategies. Specifically, we study the impact of automation—that is, the buyer uses a chatbot to automatically inquire about prices instead of asking in person—and the impact of smartness—that is, the buyer signals the use of a smart AI algorithm in selecting the supplier. Academic/practical relevance : In a world advancing toward AI, we explore how AI creates and delivers value in procurement. AI has two unique abilities: automation and smartness, which are associated with physical machines or software that enable us to operate more efficiently and effectively. Methodology : We collaborate with a trading company to run a field experiment on an online platform in which we compare suppliers’ wholesale price quotes across female, male, and chatbot buyer types under AI and no recommendation conditions. Results : We find that, when not equipped with a smart control, there is price discrimination against chatbot buyers who receive a higher wholesale price quote than human buyers. In fact, without smartness, automation alone receives the highest quoted wholesale price. However, signaling the use of a smart recommendation system can effectively reduce suppliers’ price quote for chatbot buyers. We also show that AI delivers the most value when buyers adopt automation and smartness simultaneously in procurement. Managerial implications : Our results imply that automation is not very valuable when implemented without smartness, which in turn suggests that building smartness is necessary before considering high levels of autonomy. Our study unlocks the optimal steps that buyers could adopt to develop AI in procurement processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruomeng Cui & Meng Li & Shichen Zhang, 2022. "AI and Procurement," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 691-706, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:2:p:691-706
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0989
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.0989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karel H. van Donselaar & Vishal Gaur & Tom van Woensel & Rob A. C. M. Broekmeulen & Jan C. Fransoo, 2010. "Ordering Behavior in Retail Stores and Implications for Automated Replenishment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 766-784, May.
    2. Nitish Jain & Karan Girotra & Serguei Netessine, 2014. "Managing Global Sourcing: Inventory Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1202-1222, May.
    3. Ayres, Ian & Siegelman, Peter, 1995. "Race and Gender Discrimination in Bargaining for a New Car," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(3), pages 304-321, June.
    4. Richard Engelbrecht-Wiggans & Elena Katok, 2008. "Regret and Feedback Information in First-Price Sealed-Bid Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 808-819, April.
    5. Xueming Luo & Siliang Tong & Zheng Fang & Zhe Qu, 2019. "Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 937-947, November.
    6. Pinkley, Robin L. & Neale, Margaret A. & Bennett, Rebecca J., 1994. "The Impact of Alternatives to Settlement in Dyadic Negotiation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 97-116, January.
    7. Tom F. Tan & Bradley R. Staats, 2020. "Behavioral Drivers of Routing Decisions: Evidence from Restaurant Table Assignment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1050-1070, April.
    8. Christian Terwiesch & Marcelo Olivares & Bradley R. Staats & Vishal Gaur, 2020. "OM Forum—A Review of Empirical Operations Management over the Last Two Decades," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 656-668, July.
    9. Tunay I. Tunca & Weiming Zhu, 2018. "Buyer Intermediation in Supplier Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(12), pages 5631-5650, December.
    10. Maria R. Ibanez & Jonathan R. Clark & Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2018. "Discretionary Task Ordering: Queue Management in Radiological Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4389-4407, September.
    11. Berkeley J. Dietvorst & Joseph P. Simmons & Cade Massey, 2018. "Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1155-1170, March.
    12. Ruomeng Cui & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2015. "Information Sharing in Supply Chains: An Empirical and Theoretical Valuation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(11), pages 2803-2824, November.
    13. Jorge Mejia & Chris Parker, 2021. "When Transparency Fails: Bias and Financial Incentives in Ridesharing Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 166-184, January.
    14. Özalp Özer & Yanchong Zheng & Yufei Ren, 2014. "Trust, Trustworthiness, and Information Sharing in Supply Chains Bridging China and the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2435-2460, October.
    15. Gerald Häubl & Valerie Trifts, 2000. "Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 4-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felipe Caro & Anna Sáez de Tejada Cuenca, 2023. "Believing in Analytics: Managers’ Adherence to Price Recommendations from a DSS," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 524-542, March.
    2. Yuqian Xu & Hongyan Dai & Wanfeng Yan, 2026. "Identity Disclosure and Anthropomorphism in Voice Chatbot Design: A Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 223-241, January.
    3. Jiankun Sun & Dennis J. Zhang & Haoyuan Hu & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2022. "Predicting Human Discretion to Adjust Algorithmic Prescription: A Large-Scale Field Experiment in Warehouse Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 846-865, February.
    4. Felipe Caro & Jean-Edouard Colliard & Elena Katok & Axel Ockenfels & Nicolas Stier-Moses & Catherine Tucker & D. J. Wu, 2026. "Introduction to the Special Issue on the Human-Algorithm Connection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Yiwei Wang & Vidyanand Choudhary & Shuya Yin, 2023. "Product Design Enhancement for Fashion Retailing," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 157-171, September.
    6. Clare Snyder & Samantha Keppler & Stephen Leider, 2026. "Algorithm Reliance: Fast and Slow," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 368-385, January.
    7. Karca D. Aral & Erasmo Giambona & Ye Wang, 2022. "Buyer’s Bankruptcy Risk, Sourcing Strategy, and Firm Value: Evidence from the Supplier Protection Act," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7940-7957, November.
    8. Ruomeng Cui & Jingyun Li & Meng Li & Lili Yu, 2021. "Wholesale Price Discrimination in Global Sourcing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1096-1117, September.
    9. Bing Bai & Hengchen Dai & Dennis J. Zhang & Fuqiang Zhang & Haoyuan Hu, 2022. "The Impacts of Algorithmic Work Assignment on Fairness Perceptions and Productivity: Evidence from Field Experiments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 3060-3078, November.
    10. Saravanan Kesavan & Tarun Kushwaha, 2020. "Field Experiment on the Profit Implications of Merchants’ Discretionary Power to Override Data-Driven Decision-Making Tools," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 5182-5190, November.
    11. Julien Grand-Clément & Jean Pauphilet, 2026. "The Best Decisions Are Not the Best Advice: Making Adherence-Aware Recommendations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 667-692, January.
    12. Brett, Jeanne & Thompson, Leigh, 2016. "Negotiation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 68-79.
    13. Hamsa Bastani & Osbert Bastani & Wichinpong Park Sinchaisri, 2026. "Improving Human Sequential Decision Making with Reinforcement Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 733-755, January.
    14. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque & Smolander, Kari, 2022. "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Qiuping Yu & Shawn Mankad & Masha Shunko, 2023. "Evidence of the Unintended Labor Scheduling Implications of the Minimum Wage," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1947-1965, September.
    16. Blair Flicker, 2026. "Managerial Insight and “Optimal” Algorithms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 128-147, January.
    17. Francis de Véricourt & Huseyin Gurkan, 2022. "Is your machine better than you? You may never know," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-22-02, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    18. Zhu, Yimin & Zhang, Jiemin & Wu, Jifei & Liu, Yingyue, 2022. "AI is better when I'm sure: The influence of certainty of needs on consumers' acceptance of AI chatbots," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 642-652.
    19. Lingli Wang & Ni Huang & Yili Hong & Luning Liu & Xunhua Guo & Guoqing Chen, 2023. "Voice‐based AI in call center customer service: A natural field experiment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(4), pages 1002-1018, April.
    20. Scott Schanke & Gordon Burtch & Gautam Ray, 2021. "Estimating the Impact of “Humanizing” Customer Service Chatbots," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 736-751, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:2:p:691-706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.