IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v15y2023i3p157-171.html

Product Design Enhancement for Fashion Retailing

Author

Listed:
  • Yiwei Wang

    (Zhejiang University International Business School, 314400 Haining, Zhejiang, China)

  • Vidyanand Choudhary

    (University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697)

  • Shuya Yin

    (University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697)

Abstract

As the fashion industry increasingly embraces artificial intelligence (AI), we investigate how a fast-fashion retailer should choose between using a manual design strategy or an AI-assisted design strategy to enhance existing products. A manual design is a traditional and basic approach that involves human designers only, whereas an AI-assisted design is a more innovative approach that involves both human designers and AI technologies. In this paper, the overall product enhancement is measured by two key attributes: product quality and product trendiness. Product quality can be measured by the product’s longevity as reflected by the quality of the materials and types of fabric and stitching used, where the product’s improvement level can be determined by the retailer in a continuous range. Consequently, the retailer may choose different levels of product quality under different design strategies. The two design approaches also lead to different natures of product trendiness , which is reflected by features such as styles, new materials, and colors, to name just a few. Specifically, we assume that the traditional manual design can predict well how trendy or popular the new product is. Hence, the trendiness attribute under the manual design is deterministic. However, given the uncertain nature of the AI-assisted design technology and the needed coordination between human designers and the adopted technologies, the trendiness of the new product designed under the AI-assisted approach is assumed uncertain. Two sets of designing costs are considered in product enhancement: the fixed design cost that is irrespective of the production volume and the variable marginal cost. Our analysis of the base model highlights the importance of decomposing different costs in determining the optimal design strategy. Specifically, the manual design is preferred when the fixed cost carries more weight, whereas the AI-assisted design is preferred when the marginal cost is a more important factor. Moreover, a higher level of innovation uncertainty under the AI-assisted design gives this strategy an advantage over the manual design. In our extended models, we demonstrate that (1) these results are robust even if the retailer does not have the flexibility to offer the existing product when the AI-assisted design is unpopular, and (2) the relative position of human designers in the two design approaches has an impact on the effects of these costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiwei Wang & Vidyanand Choudhary & Shuya Yin, 2023. "Product Design Enhancement for Fashion Retailing," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 157-171, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:157-171
    DOI: 10.1287/serv.2023.0315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/serv.2023.0315
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/serv.2023.0315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ram Bala & V. Krishnan & Wenge Zhu, 2014. "Distributed Development and Product Line Decisions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 1057-1066, June.
    2. Felipe Caro & Jérémie Gallien, 2007. "Dynamic Assortment with Demand Learning for Seasonal Consumer Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 276-292, February.
    3. Karel H. van Donselaar & Vishal Gaur & Tom van Woensel & Rob A. C. M. Broekmeulen & Jan C. Fransoo, 2010. "Ordering Behavior in Retail Stores and Implications for Automated Replenishment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 766-784, May.
    4. Gérard P. Cachon & Robert Swinney, 2011. "The Value of Fast Fashion: Quick Response, Enhanced Design, and Strategic Consumer Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 778-795, April.
    5. Ying-Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2013. "Coproduct Technologies: Product Line Design and Process Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(12), pages 2772-2789, December.
    6. Preyas S. Desai, 2001. "Quality Segmentation in Spatial Markets: When Does Cannibalization Affect Product Line Design?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 265-283, August.
    7. Tom F. Tan & Bradley R. Staats, 2020. "Behavioral Drivers of Routing Decisions: Evidence from Restaurant Table Assignment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1050-1070, April.
    8. Lim, Wei Shi & Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Optimal product rollover strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 905-922, October.
    9. Laura J. Kornish, 2001. "Pricing for a Durable-Goods Monopolist Under Rapid Sequential Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(11), pages 1552-1561, November.
    10. Jiankun Sun & Dennis J. Zhang & Haoyuan Hu & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2022. "Predicting Human Discretion to Adjust Algorithmic Prescription: A Large-Scale Field Experiment in Warehouse Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 846-865, February.
    11. Chao Liang & Metin Çakanyıldırım & Suresh P. Sethi, 2014. "Analysis of Product Rollover Strategies in the Presence of Strategic Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 1033-1056, April.
    12. Ying-Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2017. "Dual Coproduct Technologies: Implications for Process Development and Adoption," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 692-712, October.
    13. Xiaoyang Long & Javad Nasiry, 2022. "Sustainability in the Fast Fashion Industry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 1276-1293, May.
    14. Xiaowei Xu, 2009. "Optimal Price and Product Quality Decisions in a Distribution Channel," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(8), pages 1347-1352, August.
    15. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    16. Pol Boada-Collado & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2020. "Estimating and Optimizing the Impact of Inventory on Consumer Choices in a Fashion Retail Setting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 582-597, May.
    17. Felipe Caro & Jérémie Gallien, 2012. "Clearance Pricing Optimization for a Fast-Fashion Retailer," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1404-1422, December.
    18. Hemant K. Bhargava & Vidyanand Choudhary, 2008. "Research Note--When Is Versioning Optimal for Information Goods?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 1029-1035, May.
    19. Fernando Bernstein & Soudipta Chakraborty & Robert Swinney, 2022. "Intertemporal Content Variation with Customer Learning," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 1664-1680, May.
    20. Pnina Feldman & Yiangos Papanastasiou & Ella Segev, 2019. "Social Learning and the Design of New Experience Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1502-1519, April.
    21. Gerald Häubl & Valerie Trifts, 2000. "Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 4-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinyan Cao & Xiang Fang & Guang Xiao & Nan Yang, 2023. "Optimal Contract Design for a National Brand Manufacturer Under Store Brand Private Information," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1835-1854, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yalan Zhu & Gongqian Liang, 2024. "Designing product upgrades in the presence of online consumer reviews," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 3915-3928, September.
    2. Felipe Caro & Anna Sáez de Tejada Cuenca, 2023. "Believing in Analytics: Managers’ Adherence to Price Recommendations from a DSS," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 524-542, March.
    3. Liu, Jingchen & Zhai, Xin & Chen, Lihua, 2018. "The interaction between product rollover strategy and pricing scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 116-135.
    4. Liu, Jingchen & Zhai, Xin & Chen, Lihua, 2019. "Optimal pricing strategy under trade-in program in the presence of strategic consumers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-17.
    5. Ram Bala & Sumit Kunnumkal & Milind G. Sohoni, 2016. "Evergreening and operational risk under price competition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 71-89, February.
    6. Tao Lu & Ying‐Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2019. "Selling Co‐Products through a Distributor: The Impact on Product Line Design," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 1010-1032, April.
    7. Jing, Fei & Lin, Jun & Zhang, Qiao & Qian, Yanjun, 2022. "New technology introduction and product rollover strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 324-336.
    8. Esma Koca & Tommaso Valletti & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2021. "Designing Digital Rollovers: Managing Perceived Obsolescence through Release Times," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3698-3712, October.
    9. Pnina Feldman & Yiangos Papanastasiou & Ella Segev, 2019. "Social Learning and the Design of New Experience Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1502-1519, April.
    10. José A. Novo‐Peteiro, 2023. "Product design with attribute dependence," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 91(4), pages 361-385, July.
    11. Haowen Deng & Yifan Dou & Zenan Wu & Cheng Zhang, 2025. "Player-vs.-Player Game Design and Pricing: A Tournament Design Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 1461-1477, September.
    12. Hao, Zhaowei & Qi, Wei & Gong, Tianxiao & Chen, Lihua & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2019. "Innovation uncertainty, new product press timing and strategic consumers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 122-135.
    13. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yang, Feng, 2015. "Cooperative quality investment in outsourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 174-191.
    14. Amirnequiee, Shobeir & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Pun, Hubert, 2026. "Robust framework for the joint learning of consumer preferences and market segmentation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Amit Basu & Sreekumar Bhaskaran, 2018. "An Economic Analysis of Customer Co-design," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 787-804, December.
    16. Wen, Xin & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2019. "Fashion retail supply chain management: A review of operational models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 34-55.
    17. Kinshuk Jerath & Sang-Hyun Kim & Robert Swinney, 2017. "Product Quality in a Distribution Channel with Inventory Risk," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 747-761, September.
    18. Zhou, Pin & Xu, He & Chen, Jiguang, 2020. "Value of down-conversion policy in a vertical differentiated co-production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    19. Ruomeng Cui & Meng Li & Shichen Zhang, 2022. "AI and Procurement," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 691-706, March.
    20. Michelle M.H. Şeref & Janice E. Carrillo & Arda Yenipazarli, 2016. "Multi-generation pricing and timing decisions in new product development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 1919-1937, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:157-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.