IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i1p580-599.html

Adaptive Learning of Drug Quality and Optimization of Patient Recruitment for Clinical Trials with Dropouts

Author

Listed:
  • Zhili Tian

    (Department of Management and Decision Sciences, Wall College of Business Administration, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina 29528)

  • Weidong Han

    (Department of Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544)

  • Warren B. Powell

    (Department of Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544)

Abstract

Problem definition : Clinical trials are crucial to new drug development. This study investigates optimal patient enrollment in clinical trials with interim analyses, which are analyses of treatment responses from patients at intermediate points. Our model considers uncertainties in patient enrollment and drug treatment effectiveness. We consider the benefits of completing a trial early and the cost of accelerating a trial by maximizing the net present value of drug cumulative profit. Academic/practical relevance : Clinical trials frequently account for the largest cost in drug development, and patient enrollment is an important problem in trial management. Our study develops a dynamic program, accurately capturing the dynamics of the problem, to optimize patient enrollment while learning the treatment effectiveness of an investigated drug. Methodology : The model explicitly captures both the physical state (enrolled patients) and belief states about the effectiveness of the investigated drug and a standard treatment drug. Using Bayesian updates and dynamic programming, we establish monotonicity of the value function in state variables and characterize an optimal enrollment policy. We also introduce, for the first time, the use of backward approximate dynamic programming (ADP) for this problem class. We illustrate the findings using a clinical trial program from a leading firm. Our study performs sensitivity analyses of the input parameters on the optimal enrollment policy. Results : The value function is monotonic in cumulative patient enrollment and the average responses of treatment for the investigated drug and standard treatment drug. The optimal enrollment policy is nondecreasing in the average response from patients using the investigated drug and is nonincreasing in cumulative patient enrollment in periods between two successive interim analyses. The forward ADP algorithm (or backward ADP algorithm) exploiting the monotonicity of the value function reduced the run time from 1.5 months using the exact method to a day (or 20 minutes) within 4% of the exact method. Through an application to a leading firm’s clinical trial program, the study demonstrates that the firm can have a sizable gain of drug profit following the optimal policy that our model provides. Managerial implications : We developed a new model for improving the management of clinical trials. Our study provides insights of an optimal policy and insights into the sensitivity of value function to the dropout rate and prior probability distribution. A firm can have a sizable gain in the drug’s profit by managing its trials using the optimal policies and the properties of value function. We illustrated that firms can use the ADP algorithms to develop their patient enrollment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhili Tian & Weidong Han & Warren B. Powell, 2022. "Adaptive Learning of Drug Quality and Optimization of Patient Recruitment for Clinical Trials with Dropouts," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 580-599, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:1:p:580-599
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volodymyr Babich & Matthew J. Sobel, 2004. "Pre-IPO Operational and Financial Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 935-948, July.
    2. Philip Kaminsky & Ming Yuen, 2014. "Production capacity investment with data updates," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 664-682.
    3. Katy S. Azoury, 1985. "Bayes Solution to Dynamic Inventory Models Under Unknown Demand Distribution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(9), pages 1150-1160, September.
    4. Pindyck, Robert S., 1993. "Investments of uncertain cost," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 53-76, August.
    5. Yunzeng Wang & Yigal Gerchak, 1996. "Periodic Review Production Models with Variable Capacity, Random Yield, and Uncertain Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 130-137, January.
    6. Parlar, Mahmut & Wang, Yunzeng & Gerchak, Yigal, 1995. "A periodic review inventory model with Markovian supply availability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 131-136, December.
    7. Dimitris Bertsimas & Adam J. Mersereau, 2007. "A Learning Approach for Interactive Marketing to a Customer Segment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1120-1135, December.
    8. Ahuja, Vishal & Birge, John R., 2016. "Response-adaptive designs for clinical trials: Simultaneous learning from multiple patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 619-633.
    9. Williamson, S. Faye & Jacko, Peter & Villar, Sofía S. & Jaki, Thomas, 2017. "A Bayesian adaptive design for clinical trials in rare diseases," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 136-153.
    10. Robert McDonald & Daniel Siegel, 1986. "The Value of Waiting to Invest," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 101(4), pages 707-727.
    11. Hyeong Soo Chang & Michael C. Fu & Jiaqiao Hu & Steven I. Marcus, 2005. "An Adaptive Sampling Algorithm for Solving Markov Decision Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 126-139, February.
    12. Alba C. Rojas-Cordova & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2018. "Trial Termination and Drug Misclassification in Sequential Adaptive Clinical Trials," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 354-377, September.
    13. Frank W. Ciarallo & Ramakrishna Akella & Thomas E. Morton, 1994. "A Periodic Review, Production Planning Model with Uncertain Capacity and Uncertain Demand---Optimality of Extended Myopic Policies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 320-332, March.
    14. Martin A. Lariviere & Evan L. Porteus, 1999. "Stalking Information: Bayesian Inventory Management with Unobserved Lost Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 346-363, March.
    15. Christos H. Papadimitriou & John N. Tsitsiklis, 1987. "The Complexity of Markov Decision Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 441-450, August.
    16. Stephen Chick & Martin Forster & Paolo Pertile, 2017. "A Bayesian decision theoretic model of sequential experimentation with delayed response," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1439-1462, November.
    17. Karan Girotra & Christian Terwiesch & Karl T. Ulrich, 2007. "Valuing R& D Projects in a Portfolio: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(9), pages 1452-1466, September.
    18. Daniel R. Jiang & Warren B. Powell, 2015. "An Approximate Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Monotone Value Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1489-1511, December.
    19. Panos Kouvelis & Joseph Milner & Zhili Tian, 2017. "Clinical Trials for New Drug Development: Optimal Investment and Application," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 437-452, July.
    20. Paolo Pertile & Martin Forster & Davide La Torre, 2014. "Optimal Bayesian sequential sampling rules for the economic evaluation of health technologies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 177(2), pages 419-438, February.
    21. Vishal Ahuja & John R. Birge, 2020. "An Approximation Approach for Response-Adaptive Clinical Trial Design," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 877-894, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueze Song & Mili Mehrotra & Tharanga Rajapakshe, 2023. "An Analysis of Incentive Schemes for Participant Retention in Clinical Studies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 1033-1050, May.
    2. Ningyuan Chen & Amin Khademi, 2024. "Adaptive Seamless Dose-Finding Trials," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1656-1673, September.
    3. Qiuzhuang Sun & Jiawen Hu & Zhi-Sheng Ye, 2025. "Optimal Abort Policy for Mission-Critical Systems Under Imperfect Condition Monitoring," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2396-2416, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhili Tian & Gordon B. Hazen & Hong Li, 2023. "Optimal Enrollment in Late-Stage New Drug Development with Learning of Drug’s Efficacy for Group-Sequential Clinical Trials," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 88-107, January.
    2. Panos Kouvelis & Joseph Milner & Zhili Tian, 2017. "Clinical Trials for New Drug Development: Optimal Investment and Application," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 437-452, July.
    3. Gel, Esma S. & Salman, F. Sibel, 2022. "Dynamic ordering decisions with approximate learning of supply yield uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Stephen E. Chick & Noah Gans & Özge Yapar, 2022. "Bayesian Sequential Learning for Clinical Trials of Multiple Correlated Medical Interventions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4919-4938, July.
    5. Andres Alban & Stephen E. Chick & Martin Forster, 2023. "Value-Based Clinical Trials: Selecting Recruitment Rates and Trial Lengths in Different Regulatory Contexts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3516-3535, June.
    6. Arielle Anderer & Hamsa Bastani & John Silberholz, 2022. "Adaptive Clinical Trial Designs with Surrogates: When Should We Bother?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1982-2002, March.
    7. Williamson, S. Faye & Jacko, Peter & Jaki, Thomas, 2022. "Generalisations of a Bayesian decision-theoretic randomisation procedure and the impact of delayed responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Y. Boulaksil & J. C. Fransoo & T. Tan, 2017. "Capacity reservation and utilization for a manufacturer with uncertain capacity and demand," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(3), pages 689-709, July.
    9. Anyan Qi & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Amitabh Sinha, 2017. "Capacity Investment with Demand Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 145-164, February.
    10. Brian Tomlin, 2009. "Impact of Supply Learning When Suppliers Are Unreliable," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 192-209, August.
    11. Baruah, Pundarikaksha, 2006. "Supply Chains Facing Atypical Demand: Optimal Operational Policies And Benefits Under Information Sharing," MPRA Paper 16101, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Weidong Chen & Cong Shi & Izak Duenyas, 2020. "Optimal Learning Algorithms for Stochastic Inventory Systems with Random Capacities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1624-1649, July.
    13. Deligiannis, Michalis & Liberopoulos, George & Pandelis, Dimitrios G., 2023. "Managing supply chain risks with dual sourcing: Bayesian learning of censored supply capacity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    14. Arifoglu, Kenan & Özekici, Süleyman, 2011. "Inventory management with random supply and imperfect information: A hidden Markov model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 123-137, November.
    15. Serel, Dogan A., 2008. "Inventory and pricing decisions in a single-period problem involving risky supply," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 115-128, November.
    16. Stephen Chick & Martin Forster & Paolo Pertile, 2017. "A Bayesian decision theoretic model of sequential experimentation with delayed response," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1439-1462, November.
    17. Vishal Ahuja & John R. Birge, 2020. "An Approximation Approach for Response-Adaptive Clinical Trial Design," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 877-894, October.
    18. Gullu, Refik & Onol, Ebru & Erkip, Nesim, 1999. "Analysis of an inventory system under supply uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 377-385, March.
    19. Anyan Qi & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Amitabh Sinha, 2017. "Capacity Investment with Demand Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 145-164, February.
    20. Jian Yang & Xiangtong Qi & Yusen Xia, 2005. "A Production-Inventory System with Markovian Capacity and Outsourcing Option," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 328-349, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:1:p:580-599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.