IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v59y2013i7p1631-1649.html

Guilt by Association: Strategic Failure Prevention and Recovery Capacity Investments

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Hyun Kim

    (Yale School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511)

  • Brian Tomlin

    (Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755)

Abstract

We examine technological systems that display the following characteristics: (i) unplanned outages incur significant costs, (ii) the system experiences an outage if one or more of its subsystems fails, (iii) subsystem failures may occur simultaneously, and (iv) subsystem recovery requires specific resources and capabilities that are provided by different firms. Firms may invest in two measures to enhance system availability---namely, failure prevention and recovery capacity. If recovery capacity investment is the only option, we find that the firms in a decentralized setting overinvest in capacity, resulting in higher system availability but at a higher cost. If both investments can be made, we find that the firms underinvest in failure prevention and overinvest in recovery capacity. That is, firms in a decentralized setting shift their focus from preventing failures to responding to failures. The net effect is lower system availability, reversing the conclusion above. We also find that, unexpectedly, firms are more willing to let their subsystems fail if a joint failure is more likely to occur. This paper was accepted by Martin Lariviere, operations management.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Hyun Kim & Brian Tomlin, 2013. "Guilt by Association: Strategic Failure Prevention and Recovery Capacity Investments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(7), pages 1631-1649, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:59:y:2013:i:7:p:1631-1649
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1658
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary D. Scudder, 1984. "Priority Scheduling and Spares Stocking Policies for a Repair Shop: The Multiple Failure Case," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 739-749, June.
    2. Sang-Hyun Kim & Morris A. Cohen & Serguei Netessine & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2010. "Contracting for Infrequent Restoration and Recovery of Mission-Critical Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(9), pages 1551-1567, September.
    3. Volodymyr Babich & Apostolos N. Burnetas & Peter H. Ritchken, 2007. "Competition and Diversification Effects in Supply Chains with Supplier Default Risk," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 123-146, October.
    4. Richard Cornes, 1993. "Dyke Maintenance and Other Stories: Some Neglected Types of Public Goods," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(1), pages 259-271.
    5. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    6. Kunreuther, Howard & Heal, Geoffrey, 2003. "Interdependent Security," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 26(2-3), pages 231-249, March-May.
    7. Mohammed Abdellaoui & R. Duncan Luce & Mark J. Machina & Bertrand Munier (ed.), 2007. "Uncertainty and Risk," Theory and Decision Library C, Springer, number 978-3-540-48935-1, February.
    8. Maqbool Dada & Nicholas C. Petruzzi & Leroy B. Schwarz, 2007. "A Newsvendor's Procurement Problem when Suppliers Are Unreliable," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 9-32, August.
    9. Sunil Chopra & Gilles Reinhardt & Usha Mohan, 2007. "The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(5), pages 544-555, August.
    10. Gérard P. Cachon & Pnina Feldman, 2011. "Pricing Services Subject to Congestion: Charge Per-Use Fees or Sell Subscriptions?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 244-260, June.
    11. Kjell Hausken, 2002. "Probabilistic Risk Analysis and Game Theory," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 17-27, February.
    12. Jack Hirshleifer, 1983. "From weakest-link to best-shot: The voluntary provision of public goods," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 371-386, January.
    13. H. Dharma Kwon & Steven A. Lippman & Kevin F. McCardle & Christopher S. Tang, 2010. "Project Management Contracts with Delayed Payments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 692-707, October.
    14. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 1999. "Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1091-1108, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Long He & Ying Rong & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2020. "Product Sourcing and Distribution Strategies under Supply Disruption and Recall Risks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 9-23, January.
    2. Erjie Ang & Dan A. Iancu & Robert Swinney, 2017. "Disruption Risk and Optimal Sourcing in Multitier Supply Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(8), pages 2397-2419, August.
    3. Gupta, Varun & Ivanov, Dmitry & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Competitive pricing of substitute products under supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Brian Tomlin, 2009. "Disruption‐management strategies for short life‐cycle products," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 318-347, June.
    5. Ni, Ni & Howell, Brendan J. & Sharkey, Thomas C., 2018. "Modeling the impact of unmet demand in supply chain resiliency planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Tao Lu & Brian Tomlin, 2023. "Forewarned Is Forearmed? Contingent Sourcing, Shipment Information, and Supplier Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1796-1813, September.
    7. Fabian J. Sting & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2012. "Dual sourcing: Responsive hedging against correlated supply and demand uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 69-89, February.
    8. Xiang Li, 2017. "Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 167-181, October.
    9. Hausken, Kjell, 2024. "Fifty Years of Operations Research in Defense," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 355-368.
    10. Cheong, Taesu & Song, Sang Hwa, 2013. "The value of information on supply risk under random yields," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 27-38.
    11. Daniel G. Arce & Dan Kovenock J. & Brian Roberson, 2009. "Suicide Terrorism and the Weakest Link," CESifo Working Paper Series 2753, CESifo.
    12. Qi, Lian, 2013. "A continuous-review inventory model with random disruptions at the primary supplier," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 59-74.
    13. Sarah Parlane & Ying-Yi Tsai, 2017. "Optimal Management of Supply Disruptions when Contracting with Unreliable, Risk-averse, Suppliers," Working Papers 201714, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    14. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    15. Brian Tomlin, 2009. "Impact of Supply Learning When Suppliers Are Unreliable," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 192-209, August.
    16. Qi Feng & J. George Shanthikumar, 2018. "Supply and Demand Functions in Inventory Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 77-91, 1-2.
    17. Simeon Hagspiel, 2016. "Supply Chain Reliability and the Role of Individual Suppliers," EWI Working Papers 2016-5, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    18. Kirchgässner, Gebhard, 2010. "On minimal morals," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 330-339, September.
    19. Huang, He & Xu, Hongyan, 2015. "Dual sourcing and backup production: Coexistence versus exclusivity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 22-33.
    20. Ying Rong & Lawrence V. Snyder & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2017. "Bullwhip and reverse bullwhip effects under the rationing game," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 203-216, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:59:y:2013:i:7:p:1631-1649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.