IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v56y2010i2p373-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divisor-Based Biproportional Apportionment in Electoral Systems: A Real-Life Benchmark Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Maier

    () (Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, D-86135 Augsburg, Germany)

  • Petur Zachariassen

    () (University of the Faroe Islands, FO-100 Tórshavn, Faroe Islands)

  • Martin Zachariasen

    () (Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

Biproportional apportionment methods provide two-way proportionality in electoral systems where the electoral region is subdivided into electoral districts. The problem is to assign integral values to the elements of a matrix that are proportional to a given input matrix, and such that a set of row- and column-sum requirements are fulfilled. In a divisor-based method for biproportional apportionment, the problem is solved by computing appropriate row and column divisors, and by rounding the quotients. We present a comprehensive experimental evaluation of divisor-based biproportional apportionment in an electoral system context. By performing experiments on real-life benchmark instances (election data with multimember districts), we evaluate the general quality of divisor-based apportionments with respect to, e.g., deviation from quota, reversal orderings, and occurrences of ties. For example, we studied the frequency in which a party with a higher vote count in a district ended up with fewer seats in that district.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Maier & Petur Zachariassen & Martin Zachariasen, 2010. "Divisor-Based Biproportional Apportionment in Electoral Systems: A Real-Life Benchmark Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 373-387, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:56:y:2010:i:2:p:373-387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1118
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence R. Ernst, 1994. "Appointment Methods for the House of Representatives and the Court Challenges," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(10), pages 1207-1227, October.
    2. Michel Balinski & Gabrielle Demange, 1989. "Algorithm for Proportional Matrices in Reals and Integers," Post-Print halshs-00585327, HAL.
    3. Gassner, Marjorie, 1988. "Two-dimensional rounding for a quasi-proportional representation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 529-538.
    4. Marjorie B. Gassner, 1991. "Biproportional Delegations," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 321-342, July.
    5. Gisèle De Meur & Marjorie Gassner & Xavier Hubaut, 1985. "A Mathematical Model for Political Bipolarization," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/232145, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Gaffke, Norbert & Pukelsheim, Friedrich, 2008. "Divisor methods for proportional representation systems: An optimization approach to vector and matrix apportionment problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 166-184, September.
    7. Benoit, Kenneth, 2000. "Which Electoral Formula Is the Most Proportional? A New Look with New Evidence," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(04), pages 381-388, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Demange, Gabrielle, 2012. "On party-proportional representation under district distortions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 181-191.
    2. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00623031 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Oelbermann, Kai-Friederike, 2016. "Alternate Scaling algorithm for biproportional divisor methods," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 25-32.
    4. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00644439 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:56:y:2010:i:2:p:373-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.