IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v45y1999i5p722-732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Utilization of Workers Whose Capabilities Differ

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard M. Campbell

    (Department of Operations and Information Management, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269)

Abstract

This paper develops a model for allocating cross-trained workers at the beginning of a shift in a multidepartment service environment. It assumes departments are trying to maximize objective functions that are concave with respect to the number of workers assigned. Worker capabilities are described by parameters that range from zero to one, with fractional values representing workers who are less than fully qualified. The nonlinear programming model presented is a variant of the generalized assignment problem. The model is used in a series of experiments to investigate the value of cross-utilization as a function of factors such as demand variability and levels of cross-training. Results show that the benefits of cross-utilization can be substantial, and in many cases a small degree of cross-training can capture most of the benefits. Beyond a certain amount additional cross-training adds little additional value, and the preferred amount depends heavily on the level of demand variability.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard M. Campbell, 1999. "Cross-Utilization of Workers Whose Capabilities Differ," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 722-732, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:45:y:1999:i:5:p:722-732
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.45.5.722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.5.722
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.45.5.722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred F. Easton & Donald F. Rossin, 1991. "Sufficient Working Subsets for the Tour Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(11), pages 1441-1451, November.
    2. Turgut Aykin, 1996. "Optimal Shift Scheduling with Multiple Break Windows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 591-602, April.
    3. Siferd, Sue Perrott & Benton, W. C., 1992. "Workforce staffing and scheduling: Hospital nursing specific models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 233-246, August.
    4. Ahmad I. Z. Jarrah & Jonathan F. Bard & Anura H. deSilva, 1994. "Solving Large-Scale Tour Scheduling Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(9), pages 1124-1144, September.
    5. Vandankumar M. Trivedi & D. Michael Warner, 1976. "A Branch and Bound Algorithm for Optimum Allocation of Float Nurses," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(9), pages 972-981, May.
    6. D. Michael Warner & Juan Prawda, 1972. "A Mathematical Programming Model for Scheduling Nursing Personnel in a Hospital," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4-Part-1), pages 411-422, December.
    7. William J. Abernathy & Nicholas Baloff & John C. Hershey & Sten Wandel, 1973. "A Three-Stage Manpower Planning and Scheduling Model—A Service-Sector Example," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 693-711, June.
    8. Cattrysse, Dirk G. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1992. "A survey of algorithms for the generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 260-272, August.
    9. Awi Federgruen & Henry Groenevelt, 1986. "Optimal Flows in Networks with Multiple Sources and Sinks, with Applications to Oil and Gas Lease Investment Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 218-225, April.
    10. Gary M. Thompson, 1995. "Improved Implicit Optimal Modeling of the Labor Shift Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 595-607, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Campbell, Gerard M. & Diaby, Moustapha, 2002. "Development and evaluation of an assignment heuristic for allocating cross-trained workers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 9-20, April.
    2. Brusco, Michael J., 2015. "A bicriterion algorithm for the allocation of cross-trained workers based on operational and human resource objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 46-59.
    3. Easton, Fred F. & Mansour, Nashat, 1999. "A distributed genetic algorithm for deterministic and stochastic labor scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 505-523, November.
    4. Haase, Knut, 1999. "Retail business staff scheduling under complex labor relations," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 511, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    5. Aykin, Turgut, 2000. "A comparative evaluation of modeling approaches to the labor shift scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 381-397, September.
    6. Brusco, Michael J. & Johns, Tony R., 1996. "A sequential integer programming method for discontinuous labor tour scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 537-548, December.
    7. Giovanni Felici & Claudio Gentile, 2004. "A Polyhedral Approach for the Staff Rostering Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 381-393, March.
    8. Gergely Mincsovics & Nico Dellaert, 2010. "Stochastic dynamic nursing service budgeting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 5-21, July.
    9. Mark W. Isken & Osman T. Aydas, 2022. "A tactical multi-week implicit tour scheduling model with applications in healthcare," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 551-573, December.
    10. Michael J. Brusco & Larry W. Jacobs, 1998. "Personnel Tour Scheduling When Starting-Time Restrictions Are Present," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 534-547, April.
    11. Venkataraman, R. & Brusco, M. J., 1996. "An integrated analysis of nurse staffing and scheduling policies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 57-71, February.
    12. Maenhout, Broos & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2013. "An integrated nurse staffing and scheduling analysis for longer-term nursing staff allocation problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 485-499.
    13. Tolga Çezik & Oktay Günlük & Hanan Luss, 2001. "An integer programming model for the weekly tour scheduling problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(7), pages 607-624, October.
    14. Ernst, A. T. & Jiang, H. & Krishnamoorthy, M. & Sier, D., 2004. "Staff scheduling and rostering: A review of applications, methods and models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 3-27, February.
    15. Li, L. X. & Benton, W. C., 1996. "Performance measurement criteria in health care organizations: Review and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 449-468, September.
    16. Anuj Mehrotra & Kenneth E. Murphy & Michael A. Trick, 2000. "Optimal shift scheduling: A branch‐and‐price approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(3), pages 185-200, April.
    17. Idris Addou & François Soumis, 2007. "Bechtold-Jacobs generalized model for shift scheduling with extraordinary overlap," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 177-205, November.
    18. Arpan Rijal & Marco Bijvank & Asvin Goel & René de Koster, 2021. "Workforce Scheduling with Order-Picking Assignments in Distribution Facilities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 725-746, May.
    19. Melanie Erhard, 2021. "Flexible staffing of physicians with column generation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 212-252, March.
    20. B Maenhout & M Vanhoucke, 2009. "The impact of incorporating nurse-specific characteristics in a cyclical scheduling approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1683-1698, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:45:y:1999:i:5:p:722-732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.