IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v38y2026i1p67-85.html

Fair and Reliable Reconnections for Temporary Disruptions in Electric Distribution Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Swati Gupta

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Cyrus Hettle

    (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30318)

  • Daniel Molzahn

    (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30318)

Abstract

Increasing reliability and reducing disruptions in supply networks are of increasing importance; for example, power outages in electricity distribution networks cost $35–$50 billion annually in the United States. Motivated by the operational constraints of such networks and their rapid adoption of decentralized paradigms and self-healing components, we introduce the minimum reconnection time (MRT) problem, which models reliability metrics such as the System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI). MRT seeks to reduce outage time after network disruptions by programming reconnection times of different edges (i.e., switches), ensuring that the operating network is acyclic. We show that MRT is NP-hard and is a special case of the well-known (weighted) minimum sum set cover (MSSC) problem. We develop the theory of kernel-based randomized rounding approaches to give a tight polynomial-time approximation for MSSC, improving the state-of-the-art approximation factor for these instances. Further, motivated by the reliability incentive structure for utility companies and operational energy losses in distribution networks, we study minimizing energy losses and reliability metrics such as SAIDI and reconnection times simultaneously. Optimizing for any single objective at a time can create unfair duration of expected outage for industrial and residential areas. We, therefore, propose local search over spanning trees to balance these multiple objectives. We computationally validate our reconfiguration methods on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Synthetic Models for Advanced, Realistic Testing: Distribution Systems and Scenarios Greensboro synthetic network and show that this improves equity by a factor of four across industrial and residential areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Swati Gupta & Cyrus Hettle & Daniel Molzahn, 2026. "Fair and Reliable Reconnections for Temporary Disruptions in Electric Distribution Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 67-85, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:67-85
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2022.0295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0295
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul L. Joskow, 2014. "Incentive Regulation in Theory and Practice: Electricity Distribution and Transmission Networks," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Regulation and Its Reform: What Have We Learned?, pages 291-344, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Young Woong Park, 2020. "MILP Models for Complex System Reliability Redundancy Allocation with Mixed Components," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 600-619, July.
    3. Dokic, Svjetlana B. & Rajakovic, Nikola Lj., 2019. "Security modelling of integrated gas and electrical power systems by analyzing critical situations and potentials for performance optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 141-150.
    4. Leslie A. Hall & Andreas S. Schulz & David B. Shmoys & Joel Wein, 1997. "Scheduling to Minimize Average Completion Time: Off-Line and On-Line Approximation Algorithms," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 513-544, August.
    5. David E. Whited & Douglas R. Shier & James P. Jarvis, 1990. "Reliability Computations for Planar Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 46-60, February.
    6. LaCommare, Kristina Hamachi & Eto, Joseph H. & Dunn, Laurel N. & Sohn, Michael D., 2018. "Improving the estimated cost of sustained power interruptions to electricity customers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1038-1047.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan, Peng & Pu, Yuran & Liu, Chang, 2021. "Improving electricity supply reliability in China: Cost and incentive regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Amy Finkelstein, 2008. "Input and Technology Choices in Regulated Industries: Evidence from the Health Care Sector," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 837-880, October.
    3. Zhang, Hanxiao & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Robust optimization on redundancy allocation problems in multi-state and continuous-state series–parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    4. Rolf H. Möhring & Andreas S. Schulz & Frederik Stork & Marc Uetz, 2003. "Solving Project Scheduling Problems by Minimum Cut Computations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 330-350, March.
    5. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    6. Palovic, Martin, 2022. "Administrative congestion management meets electricity network regulation: Aligning incentives between the renewable generators and network operator," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Joalland, Olivier & Pereau, Jean-Christophe & Rambonilaza, Tina, 2019. "Bargaining local compensation payments for the installation of new power transmission lines," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 75-85.
    8. Büsing, Christina & Goetzmann, Kai-Simon & Matuschke, Jannik & Stiller, Sebastian, 2017. "Reference points and approximation algorithms in multicriteria discrete optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 829-840.
    9. Carvallo, Juan Pablo & Frick, Natalie Mims & Schwartz, Lisa, 2022. "A review of examples and opportunities to quantify the grid reliability and resilience impacts of energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Hesamzadeh, M.R. & Rosellón, J. & Gabriel, S.A. & Vogelsang, I., 2018. "A simple regulatory incentive mechanism applied to electricity transmission pricing and investment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 423-439.
    11. Colin Busby & Daniel Schwanen, 2013. "Putting the Market Back in Dairy Marketing," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 374, March.
    12. Patrick Jaillet & Michael R. Wagner, 2006. "Online Routing Problems: Value of Advanced Information as Improved Competitive Ratios," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 200-210, May.
    13. Martin Skutella & Maxim Sviridenko & Marc Uetz, 2016. "Unrelated Machine Scheduling with Stochastic Processing Times," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 851-864, August.
    14. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    15. Dimitris Fotakis & Jannik Matuschke & Orestis Papadigenopoulos, 2023. "Malleable scheduling beyond identical machines," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 425-442, October.
    16. Thomas Grebel, 2019. "What a difference carbon leakage correction makes!," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 939-971, July.
    17. Meier, Alan & Ueno, Tsuyoshi & Pritoni, Marco, 2019. "Using data from connected thermostats to track large power outages in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Dengpan Liu & Sumit Sarkar & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2010. "Resource Allocation Policies for Personalization in Content Delivery Sites," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 227-248, June.
    19. Ariel Casarin, 2014. "Productivity throughout regulatory cycles in gas utilities," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 115-137, April.
    20. Bhimaraju, Akhil & Etesami, S. Rasoul & Varshney, Lav R., 2026. "Dynamic batching of online arrivals to leverage economies of scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(3), pages 749-761.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:67-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.