IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v38y2026i1p269-294.html

Designing a Framework for Solving Multiobjective Simulation Optimization Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Tyler H. Chang

    (Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439)

  • Stefan M. Wild

    (Applied Mathematics and Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720)

Abstract

Multiobjective simulation optimization (MOSO) problems are optimization problems with multiple conflicting objectives, where evaluation of at least one of the objectives depends on a black-box numerical code or real-world experiment, which we refer to as a simulation. Whereas an extensive body of research is dedicated to developing new algorithms and methods for solving these and related problems, it is challenging and time-consuming to integrate these techniques into real-world production-ready solvers. This is partly because of the diversity and complexity of modern state-of-the-art MOSO algorithms and methods and partly because of the complexity and specificity of many real-world problems and their corresponding computing environments. The complexity of this problem is only compounded when introducing potentially complex and/or domain-specific surrogate-modeling techniques, problem formulations, design spaces, and data acquisition functions. This paper carefully surveys the current state of the art in MOSO algorithms, techniques, and solvers, as well as problem types and computational environments where MOSO is commonly applied. We then present several key challenges in the design of a parallel multiobjective simulation optimization framework (ParMOO) and how they have been addressed. Finally, we provide two case studies demonstrating how customized ParMOO solvers can be quickly built and deployed to solve real-world MOSO problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tyler H. Chang & Stefan M. Wild, 2026. "Designing a Framework for Solving Multiobjective Simulation Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 269-294, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:269-294
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2023.0250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongchao Zhang & Andrew Conn, 2012. "On the local convergence of a derivative-free algorithm for least-squares minimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 481-507, March.
    2. Laumanns, Marco & Thiele, Lothar & Zitzler, Eckart, 2006. "An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 932-942, March.
    3. G. Cocchi & G. Liuzzi & A. Papini & M. Sciandrone, 2018. "An implicit filtering algorithm for derivative-free multiobjective optimization with box constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 267-296, March.
    4. Charles Audet & Edward Hallé-Hannan & Sébastien Le Digabel, 2023. "A General Mathematical Framework for Constrained Mixed-variable Blackbox Optimization Problems with Meta and Categorical Variables," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-37, March.
    5. Kyle Cooper & Susan R. Hunter, 2020. "PyMOSO: Software for Multiobjective Simulation Optimization with R-PERLE and R-MinRLE," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1101-1108, October.
    6. Benjamin J. Shields & Jason Stevens & Jun Li & Marvin Parasram & Farhan Damani & Jesus I. Martinez Alvarado & Jacob M. Janey & Ryan P. Adams & Abigail G. Doyle, 2021. "Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis," Nature, Nature, vol. 590(7844), pages 89-96, February.
    7. Audet, Charles & Savard, Gilles & Zghal, Walid, 2010. "A mesh adaptive direct search algorithm for multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 545-556, August.
    8. Brian Dandurand & Margaret M. Wiecek, 2016. "Quadratic scalarization for decomposed multiobjective optimization," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(4), pages 1071-1096, October.
    9. Gabriele Eichfelder, 2009. "Scalarizations for adaptively solving multi-objective optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 249-273, November.
    10. G. Cocchi & M. Lapucci, 2020. "An augmented Lagrangian algorithm for multi-objective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 77(1), pages 29-56, September.
    11. Audet, Charles & Bigeon, Jean & Cartier, Dominique & Le Digabel, Sébastien & Salomon, Ludovic, 2021. "Performance indicators in multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 397-422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean Bigeon & Sébastien Le Digabel & Ludovic Salomon, 2021. "DMulti-MADS: mesh adaptive direct multisearch for bound-constrained blackbox multiobjective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 301-338, June.
    2. G. Liuzzi & S. Lucidi, 2026. "A derivative-free approach to mixed integer constrained multiobjective nonsmooth black-box optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 921-966, April.
    3. Tsionas, Mike G., 2019. "Multi-objective optimization using statistical models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 364-378.
    4. Mesquita-Cunha, Mariana & Figueira, José Rui & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2023. "New ϵ−constraint methods for multi-objective integer linear programming: A Pareto front representation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 286-307.
    5. Matteo Lapucci & Pierluigi Mansueto, 2023. "A limited memory Quasi-Newton approach for multi-objective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 33-73, May.
    6. Matteo Lapucci & Pierluigi Mansueto, 2024. "Cardinality-Constrained Multi-objective Optimization: Novel Optimality Conditions and Algorithms," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 323-351, April.
    7. Rastegar, Narges & Khorram, Esmaile, 2014. "A combined scalarizing method for multiobjective programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 229-237.
    8. Hanyu Lu & Lufei Huang, 2021. "Optimization of Shore Power Deployment in Green Ports Considering Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Goli, Alireza, 2024. "Efficient optimization of robust project scheduling for industry 4.0: A hybrid approach based on machine learning and meta-heuristic algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    10. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    11. Saeedeh Anvari & Metin Turkay, 2017. "The facility location problem from the perspective of triple bottom line accounting of sustainability," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6266-6287, November.
    12. Tobias Kuhn & Stefan Ruzika, 2017. "A coverage-based Box-Algorithm to compute a representation for optimization problems with three objective functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 581-600, March.
    13. Khalilpoor, Saeedeh & Kamran, Mehdi A. & Solimanpur, Maghsud, 2025. "Resilient COVID-19 vaccine supply chain: An optimization and simulation approach for multi-objective management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    14. de Freitas, Juliana Campos & Cantane, Daniela Renata & Rocha, Humberto & Dias, Joana, 2024. "A multiobjective beam angle optimization framework for intensity-modulated radiation therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 286-296.
    15. Baret, Isaline & Nguyen, Nhan Quy & Ouazene, Yassine & Yalaoui, Farouk, 2025. "Enhancing healthcare system resilience: Optimization of strategic investments portfolio," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Oszczypała, Mateusz, 2025. "Bi-objective redundancy allocation problem in systems with mixed strategy: NSGA-II with a novel initialization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    17. Wang, Chen & Zhang, Shenghui & Liao, Peng & Fu, Tonglin, 2022. "Wind speed forecasting based on hybrid model with model selection and wind energy conversion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 763-781.
    18. Zandieh, Fatemeh & Ghannadpour, Seyed Farid, 2023. "A comprehensive risk assessment view on interval type-2 fuzzy controller for a time-dependent HazMat routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 685-707.
    19. Feifeng Zheng & Chenxiang Wu & Ming Liu, 2025. "A practical d-relaxed priority rule for balancing cost and quality in fresh food delivery: Bi-objective optimization with time-dependent travel speed," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1-49, December.
    20. Carlos García-Alonso & Leonor Pérez-Naranjo & Juan Fernández-Caballero, 2014. "Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to identify highly autocorrelated areas: the case of spatial distribution in financially compromised farms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 187-202, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:269-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.