IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijds/v5y2026i2p171-190.html

Resolving Conflicts in Crowds: An Earnings Forecast Application

Author

Listed:
  • Houping Xiao

    (Institute for Insight, J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303)

  • Shiyu Wang

    (Department of Educational Psychology, Mary Frances Early College of Education, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602)

Abstract

Recently, investors can obtain earnings forecast information through traditional venues, such as Wall Street and the Institutional Brokers’ Estimate System (IBES), as well as modern social media platforms like Estimize, which generates consensus estimates based on forecasts from individuals with diverse backgrounds. As a result, this will inevitably lead to conflicts in the earnings forecast. This paper presents a novel and effective optimization-based approach to resolving such conflicts in earnings forecast data and generating an accurate and robust consensus estimation. Consistent with the wisdom-of-crowds effect, the new earnings forecast consensus is more accurate than the Wall Street consensus (67.5% of estimations with error less than Wall Street) and IBES consensus (67.4% of estimations with error less than IBES) of the time. Moreover, the new earnings forecast consensus can provide incrementally helpful information in forecasting earnings, and the incremental information is further priced in the market after the earnings announcement.

Suggested Citation

  • Houping Xiao & Shiyu Wang, 2026. "Resolving Conflicts in Crowds: An Earnings Forecast Application," INFORMS Joural on Data Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 171-190, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijds:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:171-190
    DOI: 10.1287/ijds.2023.0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijds.2023.0015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijds.2023.0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijds:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:171-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.