IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jbir00/v13y2022i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Intelligence Adoption and Implementation Risk in SMEs: Insights From an Empirical Study in Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Placide Poba-Nzaou

    (University of Quebec in Montreal, Canada)

  • Malatsi Galani

    (The Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Botswana)

  • Chaima Aloui

    (University of Quebec in Montreal, Canada)

Abstract

Business Intelligence – BI systems are increasingly accessible to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Like all Information Systems (IS), their implementation is very risky by nature. Several scholars underscore that IS risk management is more effective when initiated earlier in the system life cycle, as early as at the adoption. The objective of this research is to describe and understand the process of BI adoption in SMEs focusing on the management of implementation risk of from the adoption stage using an interpretive holistic single-case study of a small manufacturing firm in Tunisia in Africa that successfully adopted a BI system. Consistent with previous research, the study shows that in order to manage the implementation risk during the adoption stage, SMEs can proceed in a way that is more efficient for them that is rather intuitive, informal and unstructured, which is, however, explicitly based on an architecture of principles, policies and practices. The main limitation of the study is related to the qualitative single case study design.

Suggested Citation

  • Placide Poba-Nzaou & Malatsi Galani & Chaima Aloui, 2022. "Business Intelligence Adoption and Implementation Risk in SMEs: Insights From an Empirical Study in Tunisia," International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jbir00:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:1-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJBIR.305240
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Yeoh & Aleš Popovič, 2016. "Extending the understanding of critical success factors for implementing business intelligence systems," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(1), pages 134-147, January.
    2. H. Lesca & M. Sadok, 2009. "A Business Intelligence Model for SMEs Based on Tacit Knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00514906, HAL.
    3. M. Sadok & H. Lesca, 2009. "A Business Intelligence Model for SMEs Based on Tacit Knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00540288, HAL.
    4. Eva Maria Falkner & Martin R.W. Hiebl, 2015. "Risk management in SMEs: a systematic review of available evidence," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 16(2), pages 122-144, March.
    5. James G. March & Zur Shapira, 1987. "Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(11), pages 1404-1418, November.
    6. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    7. Isyaku Salisu & Mazlan Bin Mohd Sappri & Mohd Faizal Bin Omar, 2021. "The adoption of business intelligence systems in small and medium enterprises in the healthcare sector: A systematic literature review," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1935663-193, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanen Khanchel & Mohamed Afif Lakhoua & Karim Ben Kahla, 2018. "Operation of the Information Monitoring System for the Optimization of the Processing Time and the Dissemination of Financial Data," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, September.
    2. Serghie Dan & Balan Ana Maria, 2010. "Business Intelligence Systems in the business strategy - an approach to the Romanian reality," Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition, "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau, Faculty of Economic Sciences, issue 15.
    3. Mohammad Alamgir Hossain & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Caroline Chan & Craig Standing & Abdus-Samad Olanrewaju, 2018. "Sharing Political Content in Online Social Media: A Planned and Unplanned Behaviour Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 485-501, June.
    4. Winter, Peter, 2007. "Managerial Risk Accounting and Control – A German perspective," MPRA Paper 8185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Nabiha Nefzi, 2018. "Fear Of Failure And Entrepreneurial Risk Perception," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 6(2), pages 45-58, December.
    6. Talukder, Md. Shamim & Sorwar, Golam & Bao, Yukun & Ahmed, Jashim Uddin & Palash, Md. Abu Saeed, 2020. "Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Holger Patzelt & Dean A. Shepherd, 2009. "Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 319-340, January.
    8. Schweizer, Lars & Patzelt, Holger, 2012. "Employee commitment in the post-acquisition integration process: The effect of integration speed and leadership," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 298-310.
    9. Patzelt, Holger & zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, Dodo & Fischer, Heiko T., 2009. "Upper echelons and portfolio strategies of venture capital firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 558-572, November.
    10. T. K. Das & Bing-Sheng Teng, 1998. "Time and Entrepreneurial Risk Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(2), pages 69-88, January.
    11. Anthony Goerzen & Stephen Sapp & Andrew Delios, 2010. "Investor Response to Environmental Risk in Foreign Direct Investment," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 683-708, December.
    12. Kafigi Jeje, 2020. "Risk-Taking and Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Lessons from Tanzanian Bakeries," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22.
    13. Delis, Manthos D. & Hasan, Iftekhar & Tsionas, Efthymios G., 2015. "Firms' risk endogenous to strategic management choices," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 16/2015, Bank of Finland.
    14. Vidyanand Choudhary & Mingdi Xin & Zhe Zhang, 2023. "Sequential IT Investment: Can the Risk of IT Implementation Failure Be Your Friend?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1017-1044, September.
    15. de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Barberio Mariano, Enzo & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, 2018. "Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 112-129.
    16. Tena Žužek & Žiga Gosar & Janez Kušar & Tomaž Berlec, 2021. "A New Product Development Model for SMEs: Introducing Agility to the Plan-Driven Concurrent Product Development Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Elisabetta Mafrolla & Felice Matozza, 2014. "Risk management and firm size: a survey of Italian private companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 87-108.
    18. Michel Benaroch, 2018. "Real Options Models for Proactive Uncertainty-Reducing Mitigations and Applications in Cybersecurity Investment Decision Making," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 315-340, June.
    19. Johannes G. Jaspersen & Marc A. Ragin & Justin R. Sydnor, 2020. "Linking subjective and incentivized risk attitudes: The importance of losses," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 187-206, April.
    20. Saridakis, George & Benson, Vladlena & Ezingeard, Jean-Noel & Tennakoon, Hemamali, 2016. "Individual information security, user behaviour and cyber victimisation: An empirical study of social networking users," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 320-330.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jbir00:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.