IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/sarjnl/v11y2022i1p25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Analysis of Ginseng Based Forest Farming: a Sustainable Income Diversification Opportunity for Forest Landowners

Author

Listed:
  • Prabodh Illukpitiya
  • Avis Ortiz
  • Fisseha Tegegne

Abstract

While American ginseng is a complicated opportunity for forest farmers to understand, within these production systems there are many opportunities and constraints linked to production of ginseng. There are different market demands and prices paid for the various grades of dried roots depending on the system used to cultivate the plant. This study reviewed the unique benefits of producing ginseng, opportunities for forest farmers, the potential profits, as well as financial risks. The study focused on two common ginseng production systems in the southeastern region of the U.S. The specific objective of the paper is to assess economic returns of producing ginseng under different production systems. The Monte Carlo simulation was performed to analyze the profitability and risks associated with producing ginseng and performed sensitive analysis to determine the effect of uncertainty variables such as production costs, yield, and price of product on economic feasibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Prabodh Illukpitiya & Avis Ortiz & Fisseha Tegegne, 2022. "Economic Analysis of Ginseng Based Forest Farming: a Sustainable Income Diversification Opportunity for Forest Landowners," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:sarjnl:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/sar/article/download/0/0/46612/49792
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/sar/article/view/0/46612
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnold, Uwe & Yildiz, Özgür, 2015. "Economic risk analysis of decentralized renewable energy infrastructures – A Monte Carlo Simulation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 227-239.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galina Chebotareva & Inna Čábelková & Wadim Strielkowski & Luboš Smutka & Anna Zielińska-Chmielewska & Stanislaw Bielski, 2023. "The Role of State in Managing the Wind Energy Projects: Risk Assessment and Justification of the Economic Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    2. de Oliveira, Lucas Guedes & Aquila, Giancarlo & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo & de Paiva, Anderson Paulo & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson & Camatta, Ulisses Pessin, 2020. "Evaluating economic feasibility and maximization of social welfare of photovoltaic projects developed for the Brazilian northeastern coast: An attribute agreement analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    3. Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R. & Guerra, K. & Haro, P., 2023. "Market profitability of CSP-biomass hybrid power plants: Towards a firm supply of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    4. Shahriyar Nasirov & Carlos Silva & Claudio A. Agostini, 2015. "Investors’ Perspectives on Barriers to the Deployment of Renewable Energy Sources in Chile," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Natália Gava Gastaldo & Graciele Rediske & Paula Donaduzzi Rigo & Carmen Brum Rosa & Leandro Michels & Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk, 2019. "What is the Profile of the Investor in Household Solar Photovoltaic Energy Systems?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Jebali, Eya & Essid, Hédi & Khraief, Naceur, 2017. "The analysis of energy efficiency of the Mediterranean countries: A two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 991-1000.
    7. d'Amore, Federico & Bezzo, Fabrizio, 2017. "Managing technology performance risk in the strategic design of biomass-based supply chains for energy in the transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 563-574.
    8. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2017. "Risk-based methods for sustainable energy system planning: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 602-615.
    9. Cong, Di & Liang, Lingling & Jing, Shaoxing & Han, Yongming & Geng, Zhiqiang & Chu, Chong, 2021. "Energy supply efficiency evaluation of integrated energy systems using novel SBM-DEA integrating Monte Carlo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Guido C. Guerrero-Liquet & Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano & María Socorro García-Cascales & María Teresa Lamata & José Luis Verdegay, 2016. "Decision-Making for Risk Management in Sustainable Renewable Energy Facilities: A Case Study in the Dominican Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Zaroni, Hebert & Maciel, Letícia B. & Carvalho, Diego B. & Pamplona, Edson de O., 2019. "Monte Carlo Simulation approach for economic risk analysis of an emergency energy generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 498-508.
    12. Sarah Hafner & Olivia James & Aled Jones, 2019. "A Scoping Review of Barriers to Investment in Climate Change Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Aquila, Giancarlo & Coelho, Eden de Oliveira Pinto & Bonatto, Benedito Donizeti & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Nakamura, Wilson Toshiro, 2021. "Perspective of uncertainty and risk from the CVaR-LCOE approach: An analysis of the case of PV microgeneration in Minas Gerais, Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Gojiya, Anil & Deb, Dipankar & Iyer, Kannan K.R., 2019. "Feasibility study of power generation from agricultural residue in comparison with soil incorporation of residue," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 416-425.
    15. Wen-Hsiang Chiu & Wen-Cheng Lin & Chun-Nan Chen & Nien-Ping Chen, 2021. "Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process to Analyze the Development of the Green Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Angelopoulos, Dimitrios & Doukas, Haris & Psarras, John & Stamtsis, Giorgos, 2017. "Risk-based analysis and policy implications for renewable energy investments in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 512-523.
    17. Paulo Rotela Junior & Eugenio Fischetti & Victor G. Araújo & Rogério S. Peruchi & Giancarlo Aquila & Luiz Célio S. Rocha & Liviam S. Lacerda, 2019. "Wind Power Economic Feasibility under Uncertainty and the Application of ANN in Sensitivity Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-10, June.
    18. Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2022. "Financial Impacts of the Energy Transition in Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Elisangela Domingues Vaz & Regio Marcio Toesca Gimenes & Joao Augusto Rossi Borges & Rafael Todescato Cavalheiro & Andreia Maria Kremer, 2020. "Own Grain Storage Structures: Is It Worth Investing?," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 42-67, June.
    20. Morgan Bazilian & Debabrata Chattopadhyay, 2015. "Considering Power System Planning in Fragile and Conflict States," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1530, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:sarjnl:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.