IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmsjnl/v13y2023i2p68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA): A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Julianna Crippa
  • Cassia Maria Lie Ugaya

Abstract

This secondary scientific research follows the modality of review research through the systematic literature review (SLR) technique and aims to answer the following question- What methods in the literature use optimization techniques to develop Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)? The objective is to identify and map information, relate their applications, and provide a critical analysis. The research was conducted in a global context, on April 2, 2022, with no time horizon limit, in English, using Harzing's Publish or Perish tool and search sources- Scopus®, Web of Science™, and Google Scholar. After the automatic exclusion of duplicate titles, the selection of articles was carried out in five further steps- first filtering, second filtering, third filtering, fourth filtering, and finally the snowball system. Regarding the years of selected publications, a slow but continuous upward trend (growth) can be seen. A diversity of journals can be observed and that most methods integrating optimization and LCSA focus on each product/system or application. Each optimization model proposal has its specific characteristics when combined with LCSA. Overall, there is a greater frequency of articles that propose to evaluate by comparing alternative products/supply chains/production processes, followed by those that use optimization for product development in selecting the best design from a set of alternatives. This research confirms that Operational Research (OR) operates in different segments and can use different techniques to obtain optimal solutions and decision support. The optimization techniques found in this or other literature reviews should be evaluated against an established analytical model by applying them to the same case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Julianna Crippa & Cassia Maria Lie Ugaya, 2023. "Optimization in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA): A Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(2), pages 1-68, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/download/0/0/49023/52859
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/0/49023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Miao & van Dam, Koen H. & Touhami, Noura Ouazzani & Nguyen, Remy & Delval, Florent & Jamieson, Craig & Shah, Nilay, 2020. "Multi-level system modelling of the resource-food-bioenergy nexus in the global south," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Nicholas R. Magliocca, 2020. "Agent-Based Modeling for Integrating Human Behavior into the Food–Energy–Water Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Yue, Qiong & Guo, Ping, 2021. "Managing agricultural water-energy-food-environment nexus considering water footprint and carbon footprint under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    4. Zhuo Li & Liguo Wang & Wanyu Zhao, 2023. "Can Ecological Governance Policies Promote High-Quality Economic Growth? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. You, Chanhee & Han, Seulki & Kim, Jiyong, 2021. "Integrative design of the optimal biorefinery and bioethanol supply chain under the water-energy-food-land (WEFL) nexus framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Rebecca Sarku & Ulfia A. Clemen & Thomas Clemen, 2023. "The Application of Artificial Intelligence Models for Food Security: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2022. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/352782, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. Machado, R.L. & Abreu, M.R., 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of the first and second-generation ethanol supply chain in Brazil using the water-energy-food-land nexus approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Tete, Komlan H.S. & Soro, Y.M. & Sidibé, S.S. & Jones, Rory V., 2023. "Assessing energy security within the electricity sector in the West African economic and monetary union: Inter-country performances and trends analysis with policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Patange, Omkar S. & Garg, Amit & Jayaswal, Sachin, 2022. "An integrated bottom-up optimization to investigate the role of BECCS in transitioning towards a net-zero energy system: A case study from Gujarat, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Marco Pastori & Angel Udias & Luigi Cattaneo & Magda Moner-Girona & Awa Niang & Cesar Carmona-Moreno, 2021. "Bioenergy Potential of Crop Residues in the Senegal River Basin: A Cropland–Energy–Water-Environment Nexus Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Zhao, Ning & You, Fengqi, 2021. "Food-energy-water-waste nexus systems optimization for New York State under the COVID-19 pandemic to alleviate health and environmental concerns," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.