IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijmsjn/v16y2024i2p11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Negative Online Reviews Be Perceived Differently on Different Websites?

Author

Listed:
  • Mousumi Bose

Abstract

Prior research has suggested that negative online reviews may have greater effect to the receiver of word-of-mouth communication than similar positive online reviews. This research investigates the impact negative online reviews may have when consumers post them on different types of websites. Specifically, boundary conditions such as review types and review characteristics were considered as they interacted with website types to affect reviewer source credibility, specifically, reviewer expertise, trustworthiness, and ultimately, information usefulness. Study 1 results demonstrated that negative informative online reviews influence consumer’s perceptions of reviewer expertise on a knowledge-centric website compared to that on a social-centric website. However, this effect did not operate for negative online recommender reviews. Readers on knowledge-centric websites may want information to make decisions about reviewer expertise to determine whether a review was trustworthy and therefore, useful. Study 2 results demonstrated that high review reads had similar impact on both social-centric and knowledge-centric websites in terms of perceived reviewer expertise. However, when reviews had low reads, individuals on knowledge-centric websites may ignore such cues. Theoretical and managerial implications were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mousumi Bose, 2024. "Can Negative Online Reviews Be Perceived Differently on Different Websites?," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/download/0/0/50670/54902
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/view/0/50670
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.