IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v17y2025i1p105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Made People Take to the Streets? A Study on the Determinants of Protests in Brazil Based on Google Trends Data

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Luiza Dias Campos
  • Márcio da Silva Alves
  • Andrea Felippe Cabello

Abstract

In the literature on political participation through contestation, the apparent difficulties that can hinder the realization of protests are extensively debated. The high costs associated with the act of protesting can make it an option of political participation mainly associated with the high class. The importance of certain institutional frameworks that more easily give vent to a society that protests is also discussed. Psychological variables are as well explored in this area of Political Science- lacking the horizon of possibilities, certain societies can become distrustful of the efficiency of protest, submitting to the status quo, thus creating a dulled scenario of normality in the face of socioeconomic injustices. This work intended to study the determinants that could overcome these adversities in the Brazilian context. It was concluded in favor of the thesis of the mobilizing event as a relevant channel to incite protests – such as the increase in bus fares in 2013, and the World Cup in 2014. In 2015, however, there is a change in the mobilizing agenda, leading us to the second factor that most easily mobilizes Brazilians- the blaming of personalities or institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Luiza Dias Campos & Márcio da Silva Alves & Andrea Felippe Cabello, 2025. "What Made People Take to the Streets? A Study on the Determinants of Protests in Brazil Based on Google Trends Data," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(1), pages 105-105, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/51133/55489
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/51133
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Halberstam, Yosh & Knight, Brian, 2016. "Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 73-88.
    2. Muller, Edward N. & Seligson, Mitchell A., 1994. "Civic Culture and Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 88(3), pages 635-652, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robbett, Andrea & Matthews, Peter Hans, 2018. "Partisan bias and expressive voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 107-120.
    2. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile internet and the rise of political tribalism in Europe," CEP Discussion Papers dp1877, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Yong Glasure & Aie-Rie Lee & James Norris, 1999. "Level of economic development and political democracy revisited," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 5(4), pages 466-477, November.
    4. repec:gig:joupla:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:29-64 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Nicolás Ajzenman & Bruno Ferman & Pedro C. Sant’Anna, 2023. "Rooting for the Same Team: On the Interplay between Political and Social Identities in the Formation of Social Ties," Working Papers 231, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    6. Natalia Letki, 2008. "Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 99-126, March.
    7. Germano, Fabrizio & Sobbrio, Francesco, 2020. "Opinion dynamics via search engines (and other algorithmic gatekeepers)," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Alejandra Agustina Martínez, 2023. "Raise your Voice! Activism and Peer Effects in Online Social Networks," Working Papers 277, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    9. Sinan Erdogan & Eyup Serdar Erdogan, 2025. "Is the health-led growth hypothesis valid in the Sub-saharan African countries? Fresh evidence from newly developed panel causality tests," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 497-521, February.
    10. Reuter, Peter & Roman, John & Gaviria, Alejandro, 2000. "Comments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123283, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Giuberti Coutinho, Lorena, 2021. "Political polarization and the impact of internet and social media use in Brazil," MERIT Working Papers 2021-032, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    12. Tabasso, Nicole, 2019. "Diffusion of multiple information: On information resilience and the power of segregation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 219-240.
    13. Lauren M. McLaren & Vanessa A. Baird, 2006. "Of Time and Causality: A Simple Test of the Requirement of Social Capital in Making Democracy Work in Italy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(4), pages 889-897, December.
    14. Pablo Henr'iquez & Jorge Sabat & Jos'e Patr`icio Sullivan, 2021. "Politicians' Willingness to Agree: Evidence from the interactions in Twitter of Chilean Deputies," Papers 2106.09163, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    15. Andrea Tesei & Filipe Campante & Ruben Durante, 2022. "Media and Social Capital," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 69-91, August.
    16. Peter Calcagno & Beatriz Maldonado & Todd Nesbit & Mary Frances Zeager, 2024. "Political systems, regime memory, and economic freedom," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(2), pages 336-354, April.
    17. Melki, Mickael & Sekeris, Petros, 2019. "Media-driven polarization: Evidence from the US," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-13.
    18. Sophie Hatte & Jordan Loper & Thomas Taylor, 2023. "Connecting the Unconnected: Facebook Access and Female Political Representation in Sub-Saharan Africa," Post-Print hal-04310234, HAL.
    19. Hojun Choi, 2020. "The Modern Online Democracy: An Evaluation of Social Media's Ability to Facilitate Political Discourse," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 12(1), pages 277-289, October.
    20. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile Internet and the Rise of Communitarian Politics," CESifo Working Paper Series 9955, CESifo.
    21. Pierluigi Conzo & Andrea Gallice & Juan S. Morales & Margaret Samahita & Laura K. Taylor, 2021. "Can Hearts Change Minds? Social media Endorsements and Policy Preferences," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 641, Collegio Carlo Alberto.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.