IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v12y2019i11p38-47.html

Transformation of Texaco and Barriers to Its Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Shafi F. Al Dousari

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the barriers for implementing learning policy to transform Texaco into a Learning Organization. Design/Methodology: The study has incorporated quantitative approach and distributed 200 questionnaires among the employees of Texaco, out of which 189 questionnaires were received with complete responses. The extent of paradigm shift to take place in Texaco was estimated by conducting personal interviews. Chi-Square and ANOVA test have been applied through SPSS on the dependent and independent variables. Findings: Non-Learning culture (p=0.000), Limited resources (p=0.001), Program Focus (p=0.00) and not discussing the un-discussible (p=0.00) have been found as the main barriers in the way of transformation of Texaco as a learning organization. Research Implications: The implication of this research can help to adopt the positive transformational changes of the company. Practical Implications: The findings can help Texaco to identify the potential barriers and mitigate their influence on their business operations. Social Implication: Positive societal influence can be significant in improving the competitive strategy of Texaco. Originality: The changes in the organizational process can be implemented to improve the learning policy of Texaco.

Suggested Citation

  • Shafi F. Al Dousari, 2019. "Transformation of Texaco and Barriers to Its Implementation," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(11), pages 38-47, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:38-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/41051/42415
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/41051
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Editors, 2014. "International Journal of Systems Science," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 1-1, December.
    2. Shahram Mirzaei Daryani & Farzad Sattari Ardabili & Mousa Amini, 2014. "The study models of learning organisation building," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 320-333.
    3. Muhammad Farrukh & Abdul Waheed, 2015. "Learning organization and competitive advantage-An integrated approach," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(4), pages 73-79, April.
    4. Muhammad Farrukh & Abdul Waheed, 2015. "Learning Organization and Competitive Advantage-An Integrated Approach," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(4), pages 73-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agricultural cooperatives & DLOQ & learning organization & structural equation modeling, 2023. "Learning Organization Model in Agricultural Cooperatives of Iran: A Two‑Step Approach to SEM Based on DLOQ," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 13(03), September.
    2. Muafi & Uyun Qurotul, 2019. "Imitation vs Innovation: Is there an alignment between supply chain organizational learning and Islamic HRM practices?," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 143-156, December.
    3. Adnan M. Rawashdeh, 2018. "The Impact of Talent Management Strategies on Bank Performance in Jordanian Commercial Banks," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-49, December.
    4. Yazan Emnawer Al Haraisa, 2018. "Exploring the Role of Quality of Work Life in Building Learning Organization: Applied Study on the Jordanian Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Hsieh, Chia-Chun & Ma, Zhiming & Novoselov, Kirill E., 2019. "Accounting conservatism, business strategy, and ambiguity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-55.
    6. Çağla Cergibozan & A. Serdar Tasan, 2019. "Order batching operations: an overview of classification, solution techniques, and future research," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 335-349, January.
    7. Francesco Gangi & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2017. "Remarkable Funders: How Early-Late Backers and Mentors Affect Reward-Based Crowdfunding Campaigns," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(11), pages 58-69, November.
    8. Khayala I. Seyfullaeva, 2020. "Optimal Control Problem for the Weak Nonlinear Equation of Thin Plate With Control at the Coefficient of Lowest Term," Journal of Mathematics Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 1-31, June.
    9. Penghua Li, 2017. "Global finite-time attitude consensus tracking control for a group of rigid spacecraft," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(13), pages 2703-2712, October.
    10. Stefano Magrini & Margherita Gerolimetto, 2015. "Spatial Distribution Dynamics," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1172, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Ding, Yueting & Zhang, Ming & Chen, Sai & Nie, Rui, 2020. "Assessing the resilience of China’s natural gas importation under network disruptions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Moina Ajmeri & Ahmad Ali, 2017. "Analytical design of modified Smith predictor for unstable second-order processes with time delay," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(8), pages 1671-1681, June.
    13. Boeing, Geoff, 2021. "Spatial information and the legibility of urban form: Big data in urban morphology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Viet, Nguyen Quoc & Behdani, Behzad & Bloemhof, Jacqueline, . "Value of Information to Improve Daily Operations in High-Density Logistics," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(01).
    15. Iwan Hermawan & Suharnomo, 2020. "The Role of Trust-Based Active Participation as a Learning M," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(2), pages 221-235.
    16. Xiaoming Chen & James Lam & Min Meng, 2017. "Controller synthesis for positive Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems under ℓ performance," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 515-524, February.
    17. Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Minghe & Lim, Yun Fong, 2017. "Optimizing (s, S) policies for multi-period inventory models with demand distribution uncertainty: Robust dynamic programing approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 880-892.
    18. Ali, Irfan, 2016. "The impact of ERP implementation on the financial performance of the firm : An empirical study," Other publications TiSEM 876506f5-1aed-4421-aa2c-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Contreras, Sandra, "undated". "Gender Differentials and Determinants of Female- Male Holders Revenue Efficiency during the implementation of the GTP plan in Ethiopia: A Panel Data Study," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252752, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. P.R. Ouyang & V. Pano & T. Dam, 2015. "PID position domain control for contour tracking," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 111-124, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:38-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.