IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v11y2019i2p118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introducing an Online Consumer-Based Review Platform for Restaurant Hygiene

Author

Listed:
  • Wessam Atif
  • Mohamed Farid
  • Kota Kodama

Abstract

The World Health Organization states that everyone should play a role in contributing to food hygiene. In this article, we introduce the first online consumer-based platform for restaurant hygiene reviews, a platform that may provide a transparent channel for consumers to play their role in food hygiene. While public purchase decisions may be significantly affected by online consumer reviews, currently there are no dedicated websites for consumers to add restaurant hygiene reviews (RHRs), which is an expression coined in this article. The new platform helps consumers post food hygiene reviews by answering a series of questions while visiting any restaurant, and it also gives them an option to report food hygiene violations to the authorities. This website may help future research if the data collected is analyzed to understand trends in food hygiene violations noticed by the public; we also plan to have annual awards for the best restaurant in food hygiene based on consumer reviews. The questionnaire provided will also contribute to consumer food hygiene education. This platform is expected to bring food hygiene into the context of daily life and add to pressure on the restaurant industry to follow food hygiene requirements, thereby leading to a positive impact on environmental health.

Suggested Citation

  • Wessam Atif & Mohamed Farid & Kota Kodama, 2019. "Introducing an Online Consumer-Based Review Platform for Restaurant Hygiene," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 118-118, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/38275/38795
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/38275
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kostyra, Daniel S. & Reiner, Jochen & Natter, Martin & Klapper, Daniel, 2016. "Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 11-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minnema, Alec & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Gensler, Sonja & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2016. "To Keep or Not to Keep: Effects of Online Customer Reviews on Product Returns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 253-267.
    2. Sharma, Dheeraj & Pandey, Shivendra, 2020. "The role payment depreciation in short temporal separations: Should online retailer make customers wait?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Fei Qu & Yi-Ting Wang & Wen-Hui Hou & Xiao-Yu Zhou & Xiao-Kang Wang & Jun-Bo Li & Jian-Qiang Wang, 2022. "Forecasting of Automobile Sales Based on Support Vector Regression Optimized by the Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Ketron, Seth, 2017. "Investigating the effect of quality of grammar and mechanics (QGAM) in online reviews: The mediating role of reviewer crediblity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 51-59.
    5. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    6. Liao, Miyan & Fang, Jiaming & Han, Lintong & Wen, Ling & Zheng, Qiqi & Xia, Guoen, 2023. "Boosting eCommerce sales with livestreaming in B2B marketplace: A perspective on live streamers’ competencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Dominik Gutt, 2018. "In the Eye of the Beholder? Empirically Decomposing Different Economic Implications of the Online Rating Variance," Working Papers Dissertations 40, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    8. Mi Rosie Jahng & Seoyeon Hong, 2017. "How Should You Tweet?: The Effect of Crisis Response Voices, Strategy, and Prior Brand Attitude in Social Media Crisis Communication," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 147-157, May.
    9. Spassova, Gerri & Palmeira, Mauricio & Andrade, Eduardo B., 2018. "A ratings pattern heuristic in judgments of expertise: When being right Looks wrong," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 26-47.
    10. Michelle D. Steward & James A. Narus & Michelle L. Roehm, 2018. "An exploratory study of business-to-business online customer reviews: external online professional communities and internal vendor scorecards," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 173-189, March.
    11. Wei Huang & Peiqi Hu & Fu-Sheng Tsai & Yinke Liu & Yu Huang, 2022. "Smart Sales Empower Small Farmers: An Integrated Matching Method between Suppliers and Consumers Based on the Information Axiom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Chien-Lung Hsu & Yi-Chuan Liao, 2019. "Bridging User Perception and Stickiness in Business Microblog Contexts: A Moderated Mediation Model," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Kim, Taeyong & Hwang, Seungsoo & Kim, Minkyung, 2022. "Text analysis of online customer reviews for products in the FCB quadrants: Procedure, outcomes, and implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 676-689.
    14. Ho-Dac, Nga N., 2020. "The value of online user generated content in product development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 136-146.
    15. Cui Zhao & Xiaojun Wang & Yongbo Xiao & Jie Sheng, 2022. "Effects of online reviews and competition on quality and pricing strategies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3840-3858, October.
    16. Zhu, Yongmin & Liu, Miaomiao & Zeng, Xiaohua & Huang, Pei, 2020. "The effects of prior reviews on perceived review helpfulness: A configuration perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 484-494.
    17. Bitty Balducci & Detelina Marinova, 2018. "Unstructured data in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 557-590, July.
    18. Hernández-Ortega, Blanca, 2020. "When the performance comes into play: The influence of positive online consumer reviews on individuals' post-consumption responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 422-435.
    19. Lesedi Machi & Phindulo Nemavhidi & Tinashe Chuchu & Brighton Nyagadza & Marike Venter de Villiers, 2022. "Exploring the impact of brand awareness, brand loyalty and brand attitude on purchase intention in online shopping," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(5), pages 176-187, July.
    20. Miyea Kim & Jeongsoo Han & Mina Jun, 2020. "Do same-level review ratings have the same level of review helpfulness? The role of information diagnosticity in online reviews," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 563-591, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.