IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v6y2025i3p100-d1701767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling Challenges to Management Control Systems in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Maya Lambovska

    (Department of Management, University of National and World Economy, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Antoaneta Angelova-Stanimirova

    (Department of Financial Control, University of National and World Economy, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

In light of constrained resources and the rise of digitalisation in higher education, management control systems (MCSs) have emerged as essential tools for university management because of their integrity, flexibility, and effectiveness. This paper aims to elucidate the current challenges in the implementation and functioning of MCSs in higher education. To this end, a systematic literature review was undertaken in the Scopus and Web of Science databases, following the PRISMA guidelines. The review yielded 15 relevant sources published between 2020 and June 2025. Induction, deduction, content analysis, and K-means clustering were employed to analyse them. Forty-eight challenges to MCSs in higher education were identified and systematised into four groups (Growth Threats, Limitations, Malpractices, and Stakeholder Issues), covering twelve subgroups. These subgroups were ranked according to their frequency of mention. The top-ranked subgroups were HR problems (first), organisational constraints and management engagement (second), and technological integration and lack of technology training (third). All challenges were classified into clusters based on the countries analysed in the reviewed sources. This review primarily contributes to the existing knowledge by identifying and categorising the challenges to MCSs in higher education. Practically, it lays the groundwork for improving these MCSs, thus contributing to enhanced university management.

Suggested Citation

  • Maya Lambovska & Antoaneta Angelova-Stanimirova, 2025. "Unveiling Challenges to Management Control Systems in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review," World, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:3:p:100-:d:1701767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/3/100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/3/100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ni Putu Ari Aryawati & Iwan Triyuwono & Roekhudin Roekhudin & Endang Mardiati, 2024. "Bibliometric analysis on Scopus database related internal control in university: a mapping landscape," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2422566-242, December.
    2. José Vale & Joana Amaral & Luís Abrantes & Carmem Leal & Rui Silva, 2022. "Management Accounting and Control in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Mina Daskalova-Karakasheva & Denitza Zgureva-Filipova & Kalin Filipov & George Venkov, 2024. "Ensuring Sustainability: Leadership Approach Model for Tackling Procurement Challenges in Bulgarian Higher Education Institutions," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Preeta Hinduja & Razia Fakir Mohammad & Sohni Siddiqui & Shahnaz Noor & Altaf Hussain, 2023. "Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan: A Systematic Review of Progress and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Jangwan Ko & Seungsu Paek & Seoyoon Park & Jiwoo Park, 2021. "A News Big Data Analysis of Issues in Higher Education in Korea amid the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Kristin Rosalina & Ruzita Jusoh, 2024. "Levers of Control, Counterproductive Work Behavior, and Work Performance: Evidence From Indonesian Higher Education Institutions," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    7. Zhelyo Zhelev & Silviya Kostova, 2024. "Investigating the Application of Digital Tools for Information Management in Financial Control: Evidence from Bulgaria," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10775 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Francesca Francioli & Alberto Quagli, 2021. "Management accounting change and the rise of Vespa (1884-1965)," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 2), pages 313-338.
    3. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    4. Church, Bryan K. & Kuang, Xi (Jason) & Liu, Yuebing (Sarah), 2019. "The effects of measurement basis and slack benefits on honesty in budget reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-84.
    5. Anja Heinicke, 2018. "Performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and family firms: a systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 457-502, February.
    6. Ilse Svensson de Jong, 2021. "When Wrong Is Right: Leaving Room for Error in Innovation Measurement," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Simone Aresu & Luigi Rombi & Andrea Cardia, 2019. "Management accounting systems in venture capital-backed start-up companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(3), pages 35-58.
    9. Klein, Aleksandra, 2025. "Team structural control and team resilience: An empirical study of creative project-based teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Cäker, Mikael & Siverbo, Sven, 2018. "Effects of performance measurement system inconsistency on managers’ role clarity and well-being," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 256-266.
    11. Sanna Hilden & Kati Tikkamäki, 2013. "Reflective Practice as a Fuel for Organizational Learning," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Ezekiel Oluwagbemiga OYEROGBA, 2015. "Management Accounting Practices in the Developing Economies: The Case of Nigeria Listed Companies," The Journal of Accounting and Management, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2, pages 76-85, August.
    13. Frank Hartmann & Paolo Perego & Anna Young, 2013. "Carbon Accounting: Challenges for Research in Management Control and Performance Measurement," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(4), pages 539-563, December.
    14. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.
    15. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    16. Rikhardsson, Pall & Yigitbasioglu, Ogan, 2018. "Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 37-58.
    17. Widener, Sally K., 2004. "An empirical investigation of the relation between the use of strategic human capital and the design of the management control system," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 377-399.
    18. David Emsley, 2008. "Different interpretations of a “fixed” concept," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 375-397, March.
    19. Anike Sult & Janice Wobst & Rainer Lueg, 2024. "The role of training in implementing corporate sustainability: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 1-30, January.
    20. Tuomas Korhonen & Teemu Laine & Petri Suomala, 2013. "Understanding performance measurement dynamism: a case study," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 35-58, February.
    21. Friederike Wall & Stephan Leitner, 2020. "Agent-based Computational Economics in Management Accounting Research: Opportunities and Difficulties," Papers 2011.03297, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:3:p:100-:d:1701767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.