IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v6y2025i2p58-d1648308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emerging Markets’ Carbon Pricing Development: A Comparative Analysis of China and South Korea’s Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Yoo Kee Law

    (Institute for Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Chng Saun Fong

    (Institute for Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

Abstract

The transition to low-carbon economies presents unique challenges for emerging markets, particularly in developing effective carbon pricing mechanisms that balance environmental objectives with economic development needs. This study examines the ratio legis of carbon pricing policies through a comparative analysis of China and South Korea’s established systems, utilizing the FASTER (Fairness, Alignment, Stability, Transparency, Economic efficiency, Reliability) principles evaluation framework. Using qualitative doctrinal methodology integrated and comparative policy analysis legislative frameworks and market data from 2015–2023, this paper examines Malaysia as a representative case study wherein carbon market initiatives remain in voluntary phase with approximately 150,000 carbon credits traded. The comparative results demonstrate that a choice between China’s intensity-based approach and South Korea’s absolute cap system should be guided by the following: (1) development stage, with industrializing economies benefiting from China’s flexible model; (2) institutional capacity, where limited monitoring capabilities favor phased approaches; (3) economic structure, with emissions-intensive economies requiring growth-accommodating systems; (4) policy landscape complexity; and (5) market size. The research proposes a structured implementation framework for emerging markets, demonstrated through Malaysia’s context, that enables effective emission reduction while maintaining economic competitiveness during the transition to low-carbon economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoo Kee Law & Chng Saun Fong, 2025. "Emerging Markets’ Carbon Pricing Development: A Comparative Analysis of China and South Korea’s Experience," World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:58-:d:1648308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/2/58/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/2/58/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Haites, 2018. "Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 955-966, September.
    2. Mohammed Ahmar Uddin & Bisharat Hussain Chang & Salem Hamad Aldawsari & Ruoyu Li, 2025. "The Interplay Between Green Finance, Policy Uncertainty and Carbon Market Volatility: A Time Frequency Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Lawrence H. Goulder & Ian W. H. Parry, 2008. "Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 152-174, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Antoniou & Roland Strausz, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Taxation and Feed-in Tariffs," CESifo Working Paper Series 4788, CESifo.
    2. Carsten Helm & Mathias Mier, 2020. "Steering the Energy Transition in a World of Intermittent Electricity Supply: Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Renewables Storage," ifo Working Paper Series 330, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    3. Ritter, Hendrik & Zimmermann, Karl, 2019. "Cap-and-Trade Policy vs. Carbon Taxation: Of Leakage and Linkage," EconStor Preprints 197796, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Jonathan M. Lee, 2015. "The Impact of Heterogeneous NOx Regulations on Distributed Electricity Generation in U.S. Manufacturing," Working Papers 15-12, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    5. Xinkuo Xu & Liyan Han, 2017. "Diverse Effects of Consumer Credit on Household Carbon Emissions at Quantiles: Evidence from Urban China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Mbéa Bell & Sylvain Dessy, 2017. "Market Power and Instrument Choice in Climate Policy," Cahiers de recherche 1704, Centre de recherche sur les risques, les enjeux économiques, et les politiques publiques.
    7. Veith, Stefan & Werner, Jörg R. & Zimmermann, Jochen, 2009. "Capital market response to emission rights returns: Evidence from the European power sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 605-613, July.
    8. A. Cesar Y. Acevedo Arenas & Yecid A. Muñoz Maldonado & Johann F. Petit Suárez & Duban H. Morales Sánchez & Daniel F. Ramírez Contreras, 2024. "Towards a Standardized LCOE Calculation for Informed Decision-Making in Energy Policy and Investment: Application to the Colombian Context," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 523-541, November.
    9. Piris-Cabezas, Pedro & Lubowski, Ruben N. & Leslie, Gabriela, 2023. "Estimating the potential of international carbon markets to increase global climate ambition," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    11. Christopher Jeffords, 2014. "Preference-directed regulation when ethical environmental policy choices are formed with limited information," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 573-606, March.
    12. Driss Ezzine-de-Blas & Céline Dutilly & José-Alberto Lara-Pulido & Gwenolé Le Velly & Alejando Guevara-Sanginés, 2016. "Payments for Environmental Services in a Policymix: Spatial and Temporal Articulation in Mexico," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Zhang, Zibin & Yang, Wenxin & Ye, Jianliang, 2021. "Why sulfur dioxide emissions decline significantly from coal-fired power plants in China? Evidence from the desulfurated electricity pricing premium program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    14. Lehmann, Paul, 2010. "Combining emissions trading and emissions taxes in a multi-objective world," UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2010, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    15. Benjamin Jones & Michael Keen & Jon Strand, 2013. "Fiscal implications of climate change," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(1), pages 29-70, February.
    16. Larry Hughes & Moniek Jong & Zach Thorne, 2021. "(De)coupling and (De)carbonizing in the economies and energy systems of the G20," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5614-5639, April.
    17. Dietrich Earnhart & Sarah Jacobson & Yusuke Kuwayama & Richard T. Woodward, 2023. "Discretionary Exemptions from Environmental Regulation: Flexibility for Good or for Ill," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(2), pages 203-221.
    18. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    19. Julie Anne Cronin & Don Fullerton & Steven Sexton, 2019. "Vertical and Horizontal Redistributions from a Carbon Tax and Rebate," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(S1), pages 169-208.
    20. Johan Lilliestam & Anthony Patt & Germán Bersalli, 2022. "On the quality of emission reductions: observed effects of carbon pricing on investments, innovation, and operational shifts. A response to van den Bergh and Savin (2021)," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(3), pages 733-758, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:58-:d:1648308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.