IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v6y2025i2p57-d1646682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Agri-Food Digitalization: Insights from Bibliometric and Survey Analysis in Andalusia

Author

Listed:
  • José Ramón Luque-Reyes

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Higher Technical School of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering (ETSIAM), University of Cordoba, Rabanales University Campus, 14071 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Ali Zidi

    (AgriEdge, Lot 660, Hay Moulay Rachid, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco)

  • Adolfo Peña-Acevedo

    (Department of Rural Engineering, Civil Constructions and Engineering Projects, Higher Technical School of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering (ETSIAM), University of Córdoba, Rabanales University Campus, 14071 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Rosa Gallardo-Cobos

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Higher Technical School of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering (ETSIAM), University of Cordoba, Rabanales University Campus, 14071 Córdoba, Spain)

Abstract

The agri-food sector is going through a massive digital transformation thanks to new technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Regional disparities and implementation barriers prevent widespread uptake despite significant research advances. Drawing on bibliometric and survey data collected up to the end of 2023, this study examines global research trends and stakeholder perceptions in Andalusia (Spain) to identify challenges and opportunities in agricultural digitalization. Bibliographic analysis revealed that research has moved from early remote sensing to precision agriculture, IoT, robotics and big data, and that AI has recently taken over in predictive analytics, automation, and decision-support systems. However, our survey of Andalusian stakeholders highlighted a limited adoption of cutting-edge tools such as AI, blockchain, and predictive models due to economic constraints, technical challenges, and skepticism. Participants emphasized the importance of trust-building, as well as the use of simple tools that require minimal input and provide immediate benefits. Priorities for the responders were also improving market transparency, optimizing resource use, and system interoperability. The findings show that closing the gap between research and practice requires developing digital solutions that are user-centered, simplified, and context-adapted, especially when dealing with complex technologies like AI and predictive systems. This must be supported by targeted public policies and collaborative innovation ecosystems, all essential elements to accelerate the integration of smart agricultural technologies and align scientific innovation with real-world needs.

Suggested Citation

  • José Ramón Luque-Reyes & Ali Zidi & Adolfo Peña-Acevedo & Rosa Gallardo-Cobos, 2025. "Assessing Agri-Food Digitalization: Insights from Bibliometric and Survey Analysis in Andalusia," World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:57-:d:1646682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/2/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/2/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    2. Culot, Giovanna & Nassimbeni, Guido & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco, 2020. "Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Véronique Bellon Maurel & Isabelle Piot-Lepetit & Nina Lachia & Bruno Tisseyre, 2023. "Digital agriculture in Europe and in France: which organisations can boost adoption levels?," Post-Print hal-04067148, HAL.
    4. Jan Mei Soon-Sinclair & Thanh Mai Ha & Iwan Vanany & Mark Raguindin Limon & Wandee Sirichokchatchawan & Ikarastika Rahayu Abdul Wahab & Ruhil Hayati Hamdan & Mohd Hafiz Jamaludin, 2024. "Consumers’ perceptions of food fraud in selected Southeast Asian countries: a cross sectional study," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(1), pages 65-77, February.
    5. Édson Luis Bolfe & Lúcio André de Castro Jorge & Ieda Del’Arco Sanches & Ariovaldo Luchiari Júnior & Cinthia Cabral da Costa & Daniel de Castro Victoria & Ricardo Yassushi Inamasu & Célia Regina Grego, 2020. "Precision and Digital Agriculture: Adoption of Technologies and Perception of Brazilian Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Dimitrios Kalfas & Stavros Kalogiannidis & Olympia Papaevangelou & Katerina Melfou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2024. "Integration of Technology in Agricultural Practices towards Agricultural Sustainability: A Case Study of Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    7. da Silveira, Franco & da Silva, Sabrina Letícia Couto & Machado, Filipe Molinar & Barbedo, Jayme Garcia Arnal & Amaral, Fernando Gonçalves, 2023. "Farmers' perception of the barriers that hinder the implementation of agriculture 4.0," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    8. Parra-López, Carlos & Reina-Usuga, Liliana & Carmona-Torres, Carmen & Sayadi, Samir & Klerkx, Laurens, 2021. "Digital transformation of the agrifood system: Quantifying the conditioning factors to inform policy planning in the olive sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. McFadden, Jonathan & Njuki, Eric & Griffin, Terry, 2023. "Precision Agriculture in the Digital Era: Recent Adoption on U.S. Farms," USDA Miscellaneous 333550, United States Department of Agriculture.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cuiping He & Huicheng Hao & Yanhui Su & Jiaxuan Yang, 2024. "A Study on Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of E-Commerce for Agricultural Products: A Case Study of Wuchang City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Roberto Fragomeli & Azzurra Annunziata & Gennaro Punzo, 2024. "Promoting the Transition towards Agriculture 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review on Drivers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Hrosul, Viktoriia & Kruhlova, Olena & Kolesnyk, Alina, 2023. "Digitalization of the agricultural sector: the impact of ICT on the development of enterprises in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    5. Bentivoglio, Deborah & Bucci, Giorgia & Belletti, Matteo & Finco, Adele, 2022. "A theoretical framework on network’s dynamics for precision agriculture technologies adoption," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    6. Anastasios Michailidis & Chrysanthi Charatsari & Thomas Bournaris & Efstratios Loizou & Aikaterini Paltaki & Dimitra Lazaridou & Evagelos D. Lioutas, 2024. "A First View on the Competencies and Training Needs of Farmers Working with and Researchers Working on Precision Agriculture Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Thais Dibbern & Luciana Romani & Silvia Massruhá, 2025. "Drivers and Barriers to Digital Agriculture Adoption: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities in Latin American," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Ghanei, Shima & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2023. "A two-stage stochastic collaborative intertwined supply network design problem under multiple disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Fan, Yingjie & Schwartz, Frank & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 654-666.
    10. Anup Kumar & Santosh Kumar Shrivastav & Avinash K. Shrivastava & Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro, 2023. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Performance Measurement, and Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Yang, Yuxiang & Goodarzi, Shadi & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2022. "In-house production and outsourcing under different emissions reduction regulations: An equilibrium decision model for global supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Auktor, Georgeta Vidican, 2022. "The opportunities and challenges of Industry 4.0 for industrial development: A case study of Morocco's automotive and garment sectors," IDOS Discussion Papers 2/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    13. Mariusz Szuster & Malgorzata Lotko, 2022. "Disruptions and Risk Management in Supply Chains Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 225-234.
    14. Patricio Vladimir Méndez-Zambrano & Luis Patricio Tierra Pérez & Rogelio Estalin Ureta Valdez & Ángel Patricio Flores Orozco, 2023. "Technological Innovations for Agricultural Production from an Environmental Perspective: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Trapero, Juan R. & Cardós, Manuel & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2019. "Empirical safety stock estimation based on kernel and GARCH models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 199-211.
    16. Ivan Bergier & Jayme G. A. Barbedo & Édson L. Bolfe & Luciana A. S. Romani & Ricardo Y. Inamasu & Silvia M. F. S. Massruhá, 2024. "Framing Concepts of Agriculture 5.0 via Bipartite Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Brho, Mazen & Jazairy, Amer & Glassburner, Aaron V., 2025. "The finance of cybersecurity: Quantitative modeling of investment decisions and net present value," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    18. Yingjie Fan & Frank Schwartz & Stefan Voß & David L. Woodruff, 2017. "Stochastic programming for flexible global supply chain planning," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 601-633, December.
    19. Zheng, Deyuan & Song, Hang & Zhao, Chunguang & Liu, Yujiao & Zhao, Wenhao, 2024. "Is it possible for semiconductor companies to reduce carbon emissions through digital transformation? Evidence from China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    20. Spykman, Olivia & Gabriel, Andreas, 2023. "Evaluating the impact of government investment support for crop robots: a multi method approach," Agri-Tech Economics Papers 344216, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:57-:d:1646682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.