IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i4p623-d96021.html

Early-Stage Design Considerations for the Energy-Efficiency of High-Rise Office Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Babak Raji

    (Department of Architectural Engineering + Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5043, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Martin J. Tenpierik

    (Department of Architectural Engineering + Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5043, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Andy Van den Dobbelsteen

    (Department of Architectural Engineering + Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5043, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Decisions made at early stages of the design are of the utmost importance for the energy-efficiency of buildings. Wrong decisions and design failures related to a building’s general layout, shape, façade transparency or orientation can increase the operational energy tremendously. These failures can be avoided in advance through simple changes in the design. Using extensive parametric energy simulations by DesignBuilder, this paper investigates the impact of geometric factors for the energy-efficiency of high-rise office buildings in three climates contexts: Amsterdam (Temperate), Sydney (Sub-tropical) and Singapore (Tropical). The investigation is carried out on 12 plan shapes, 7 plan depths, 4 building orientations and discrete values for window-to-wall ratio. Among selected options, each sub-section determines the most efficient solution for different design measures and climates. The optimal design solution is the one that minimises, on an annual basis, the sum of the energy use for heating, cooling, electric lighting and fans. The results indicate that the general building design is an important issue to consider for high-rise buildings: they can influence the energy use up to 32%. For most of the geometric factors, the greatest difference between the optimal and the worst solution occurs in the sub-tropical climate, while the tropical climate is the one that shows the smallest difference. In case of the plan depth, special attention should be paid in the case of a temperate climate, as the total energy use can increase more than in other climates. Regarding energy performance, the following building geometry factors have the highest to lowest influence: building orientation, plan shape, plan depth, and window-to-wall ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Babak Raji & Martin J. Tenpierik & Andy Van den Dobbelsteen, 2017. "Early-Stage Design Considerations for the Energy-Efficiency of High-Rise Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:623-:d:96021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/623/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/623/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abanda, F.H. & Byers, L., 2016. "An investigation of the impact of building orientation on energy consumption in a domestic building using emerging BIM (Building Information Modelling)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 517-527.
    2. Florides, G. A. & Tassou, S. A. & Kalogirou, S. A. & Wrobel, L. C., 2002. "Measures used to lower building energy consumption and their cost effectiveness," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(3-4), pages 299-328, November.
    3. Goia, Francesco & Haase, Matthias & Perino, Marco, 2013. "Optimizing the configuration of a façade module for office buildings by means of integrated thermal and lighting simulations in a total energy perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 515-527.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catarina Ribeiro & Nuno M. M. Ramos & Inês Flores-Colen, 2020. "A Review of Balcony Impacts on the Indoor Environmental Quality of Dwellings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. ChungYeon Won & SangTae No & Qamar Alhadidi, 2019. "Factors Affecting Energy Performance of Large-Scale Office Buildings: Analysis of Benchmarking Data from New York City and Chicago," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Mustapha Mukhtar & Bismark Ameyaw & Nasser Yimen & Quixin Zhang & Olusola Bamisile & Humphrey Adun & Mustafa Dagbasi, 2021. "Building Retrofit and Energy Conservation/Efficiency Review: A Techno-Environ-Economic Assessment of Heat Pump System Retrofit in Housing Stock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Mariana Huskinson & Antonio Galiano-Garrigós & Ángel Benigno González-Avilés & M. Isabel Pérez-Millán, 2021. "Decision-Making Processes in Controlling Exposure to Sunlight Supported by Simulation Tools: A Case Study in Warm Weather," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-30, July.
    5. Ayman Ragab & Ahmed Abdelrady, 2020. "Impact of Green Roofs on Energy Demand for Cooling in Egyptian Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Nan Wang & Daniel Satola & Aoife Houlihan Wiberg & Conghong Liu & Arild Gustavsen, 2020. "Reduction Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from High-Speed Railway Station Buildings in a Cold Climate Zone of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Mohanad El-Agami & Gehad Hanafy & Medhat Osman, 2021. "Investigating the Effect of High-Rise Buildings’ Mass Geometry on Energy Efficiency within the Climatic Variation of Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Nusrat Jannat & Aseel Hussien & Badr Abdullah & Alison Cotgrave, 2020. "A Comparative Simulation Study of the Thermal Performances of the Building Envelope Wall Materials in the Tropics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Tiantian Du & Sabine Jansen & Michela Turrin & Andy van den Dobbelsteen, 2020. "Effects of Architectural Space Layouts on Energy Performance: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Ping Wang & Guangcai Gong & Yan Zhou & Bin Qin, 2018. "A Simplified Calculation Method for Building Envelope Cooling Loads in Central South China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Gupta, V. & Deb, C., 2023. "Envelope design for low-energy buildings in the tropics: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    12. Likai Wang & Patrick Janssen & Kian Wee Chen & Ziyu Tong & Guohua Ji, 2019. "Subtractive Building Massing for Performance-Based Architectural Design Exploration: A Case Study of Daylighting Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George M. Stavrakakis & Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis & Markos Damasiotis, 2021. "Basic Principles, Most Common Computational Tools, and Capabilities for Building Energy and Urban Microclimate Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-41, October.
    2. Sanhudo, Luís & Ramos, Nuno M.M. & Poças Martins, João & Almeida, Ricardo M.S.F. & Barreira, Eva & Simões, M. Lurdes & Cardoso, Vítor, 2018. "Building information modeling for energy retrofitting – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 249-260.
    3. Jian Yao, 2014. "A Multi-Objective (Energy, Economic and Environmental Performance) Life Cycle Analysis for Better Building Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Taveres-Cachat, Ellika & Lobaccaro, Gabriele & Goia, Francesco & Chaudhary, Gaurav, 2019. "A methodology to improve the performance of PV integrated shading devices using multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 731-744.
    5. Zhang, Lei & Alizadeh, As'ad & Baghoolizadeh, Mohammadreza & Salahshour, Soheil & Ali, Elimam & Escorcia-Gutierrez, José, 2025. "Multi-objective optimization of vertical and horizontal solar shading in residential buildings to increase power output while reducing yearly electricity usage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Chi, Fang'ai & Zhang, Jianxun & Li, Gaomei & Zhu, Zongzhou & Bart, Dewancker, 2019. "An investigation of the impact of Building Azimuth on energy consumption in sizhai traditional dwellings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 594-614.
    7. Shen, Meng & Li, Xiang & Lu, Yujie & Cui, Qingbin & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2021. "Personality-based normative feedback intervention for energy conservation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    8. De Boeck, L. & Verbeke, S. & Audenaert, A. & De Mesmaeker, L., 2015. "Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 960-975.
    9. Kharseh, Mohamad & Altorkmany, Lobna & Al-Khawaja, Mohammed & Hassani, Ferri, 2015. "Analysis of the effect of global climate change on ground source heat pump systems in different climate categories," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 219-225.
    10. Roberta Moschetti & Shabnam Homaei & Ellika Taveres-Cachat & Steinar Grynning, 2022. "Assessing Responsive Building Envelope Designs through Robustness-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Zero-Emission Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    11. Sadineni, Suresh B. & Madala, Srikanth & Boehm, Robert F., 2011. "Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3617-3631.
    12. Jim, C.Y., 2014. "Air-conditioning energy consumption due to green roofs with different building thermal insulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 49-59.
    13. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & de’ Rossi, Filippo & Turni, Gianluca & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2013. "Green roofs in European climates. Are effective solutions for the energy savings in air-conditioning?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 845-859.
    14. Nazir, Kashif & Memon, Shazim Ali & Saurbayeva, Assemgul, 2024. "A novel framework for developing a machine learning-based forecasting model using multi-stage sensitivity analysis to predict the energy consumption of PCM-integrated building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    15. Ahmad, Irshad, 2010. "Performance of antisolar insulated roof system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 36-41.
    16. Ihara, Takeshi & Gustavsen, Arild & Jelle, Bjørn Petter, 2015. "Effect of facade components on energy efficiency in office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 422-432.
    17. Jeongyoon Oh & Taehoon Hong & Hakpyeong Kim & Jongbaek An & Kwangbok Jeong & Choongwan Koo, 2017. "Advanced Strategies for Net-Zero Energy Building: Focused on the Early Phase and Usage Phase of a Building’s Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-52, December.
    18. Szodrai, Ferenc & Lakatos, Ákos & Kalmár, Ferenc, 2016. "Analysis of the change of the specific heat loss coefficient of buildings resulted by the variation of the geometry and the moisture load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 820-829.
    19. Ángel Gómez-Moreno & Pedro José Casanova-Peláez & José Manuel Palomar-Carnicero & Fernando Cruz-Peragón, 2016. "Modeling and Experimental Validation of a Low-Cost Radiation Sensor Based on the Photovoltaic Effect for Building Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Balvís, Eduardo & Sampedro, Óscar & Zaragoza, Sonia & Paredes, Angel & Michinel, Humberto, 2016. "A simple model for automatic analysis and diagnosis of environmental thermal comfort in energy efficient buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 60-70.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:623-:d:96021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.