IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10529-d641062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Effect of High-Rise Buildings’ Mass Geometry on Energy Efficiency within the Climatic Variation of Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Mohanad El-Agami

    (Architecture Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, El-Minya 61519, Egypt)

  • Gehad Hanafy

    (Architecture Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, El-Minya 61519, Egypt)

  • Medhat Osman

    (Architecture Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, El-Minya 61519, Egypt)

Abstract

Energy conservation is recently the most important issue all over the world, including in Egypt. Recently, the built environment of Egypt has experienced a dramatic change in its buildings’ typology, with more interest in constructing high-rise buildings. This in turn creates high demand for energy, as high-rise buildings are considered to be one of the most energy-consuming types of buildings. Egypt has a wide variety in its climatic conditions, with seven different inhabited climatic regions, and a further one which is uninhabited. Therefore, integrating the energy efficiency of a building as a major design factor in the early design stages of such a type of buildings is important. This article is concerned with investigating the effect of high-rise buildings’ geometrical shape on the building’s energy consumption within the different climatic regions of Egypt. Four building shapes (square, circular, rectangular, and ellipse) are examined. The long axe of the models is oriented to the north (“the optimum orientation within all regions”), with a window-to-wall ratio (WWR) of 30%. The performance of these models is studied in seven cities representing the inhabited Egyptian climatic regions using simulation software, DesignBuilder, with the EnergyPlus simulation tool. Study findings revealed that adjusting the geometric form of the building significantly affects energy consumption and thermal comfort with climatic variation. The most compact shape, circular, was the most suitable geometrical shape in four regions out of seven. The ellipse shape was found to be the most suitable mass geometry within two other regions, while the square shape was found to be effective in only one region. The results of this research indicate that designers should not use the rectangular shape anywhere across Egypt.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohanad El-Agami & Gehad Hanafy & Medhat Osman, 2021. "Investigating the Effect of High-Rise Buildings’ Mass Geometry on Energy Efficiency within the Climatic Variation of Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10529-:d:641062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10529/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10529/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babak Raji & Martin J. Tenpierik & Andy Van den Dobbelsteen, 2017. "Early-Stage Design Considerations for the Energy-Efficiency of High-Rise Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ChungYeon Won & SangTae No & Qamar Alhadidi, 2019. "Factors Affecting Energy Performance of Large-Scale Office Buildings: Analysis of Benchmarking Data from New York City and Chicago," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Mariana Huskinson & Antonio Galiano-Garrigós & Ángel Benigno González-Avilés & M. Isabel Pérez-Millán, 2021. "Decision-Making Processes in Controlling Exposure to Sunlight Supported by Simulation Tools: A Case Study in Warm Weather," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Nan Wang & Daniel Satola & Aoife Houlihan Wiberg & Conghong Liu & Arild Gustavsen, 2020. "Reduction Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from High-Speed Railway Station Buildings in a Cold Climate Zone of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Mustapha Mukhtar & Bismark Ameyaw & Nasser Yimen & Quixin Zhang & Olusola Bamisile & Humphrey Adun & Mustafa Dagbasi, 2021. "Building Retrofit and Energy Conservation/Efficiency Review: A Techno-Environ-Economic Assessment of Heat Pump System Retrofit in Housing Stock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Tiantian Du & Sabine Jansen & Michela Turrin & Andy van den Dobbelsteen, 2020. "Effects of Architectural Space Layouts on Energy Performance: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Gupta, V. & Deb, C., 2023. "Envelope design for low-energy buildings in the tropics: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    7. Likai Wang & Patrick Janssen & Kian Wee Chen & Ziyu Tong & Guohua Ji, 2019. "Subtractive Building Massing for Performance-Based Architectural Design Exploration: A Case Study of Daylighting Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Catarina Ribeiro & Nuno M. M. Ramos & Inês Flores-Colen, 2020. "A Review of Balcony Impacts on the Indoor Environmental Quality of Dwellings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Ayman Ragab & Ahmed Abdelrady, 2020. "Impact of Green Roofs on Energy Demand for Cooling in Egyptian Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Ping Wang & Guangcai Gong & Yan Zhou & Bin Qin, 2018. "A Simplified Calculation Method for Building Envelope Cooling Loads in Central South China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Nusrat Jannat & Aseel Hussien & Badr Abdullah & Alison Cotgrave, 2020. "A Comparative Simulation Study of the Thermal Performances of the Building Envelope Wall Materials in the Tropics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10529-:d:641062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.