IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i2p278-d90470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Expert-Based Assessment Model for Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Pond-Breeding Amphibians

Author

Listed:
  • Shin-Ruoh Juang

    (Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Szu-Hung Chen

    (Department of Ecosystem Science & Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Chen-Fa Wu

    (Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

Abstract

Farm ponds are important habitats for amphibians, birds, and other wildlife. In Taiwan, artificial ponds were originally created on farmlands for irrigation purposes and the needs of the domestic water supply. Although pond creation is a typical farming practice, it also provides habitats for pond-breeding amphibians. Thus, it is essential to understand the current status of habitats and their vulnerability regarding urgent conservation needs for target species. Günther’s frog ( Hylarana guentheri ), a pond-breeding amphibian, has a high sensitivity towards surrounding environmental changes, and can be used as an indicator species to assess habitat suitability. The purpose of this study is to establish a systematic framework to assess the habitat suitability of pond-breeding amphibians by using Günther’s frog as a pilot-study species. First, we collected frog survey data from Chiayi, Taiwan, from winter 2013 to spring 2015, and investigated the present status of the environmental conditions around the ponds. Next, expert questionnaires and the fuzzy Delphi method were applied to establish the hierarchical evaluation criteria regarding the habitat suitability assessment. Four indicators: the aquatic environments of farm ponds; the terrestrial environments around ponds; landscape connectivity; and the conservation perceptions of the residents, were determined as first-layer factors in the assessment criteria, while ten other indicators were defined as second-layer factors. Based on the established assessment criteria, we performed in situ habitat suitability evaluations on 69 selected sites and surveyed the perceptions of the residents using questionnaires. Results revealed that 19% of locations were rich in frog species with a high habitat suitability. However, 67% of locations showed signs of habitat degradation, which may imply a higher need in practicing habitat improvement or restoration. The Kappa value was 0.6061, which indicated a high reliability of the habitat suitability assessment model. In brief, the proposed method can be applied, not only to assess the sustainability of frog habitats and degradation risks, but also to determine which locations may require future attention regarding conservation implementation. Furthermore, findings in this study provide useful background knowledge to all associated stakeholders when designing and implementing plans of wildlife habitat management and restoration at farm ponds.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin-Ruoh Juang & Szu-Hung Chen & Chen-Fa Wu, 2017. "An Expert-Based Assessment Model for Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Pond-Breeding Amphibians," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:278-:d:90470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2013. "The World Bank Annual Report 2013," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 16091, December.
    2. Bennetsen, Elina & Gobeyn, Sacha & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2016. "Species distribution models grounded in ecological theory for decision support in river management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 325(C), pages 1-12.
    3. World Bank, 2017. "The World Bank Annual Report 2017," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 27986, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chun-Hsien Lai & Shin-Hwei Lin & Chia-Yi Tsai & Szu-Hung Chen, 2018. "Identifying Farm Pond Habitat Suitability for the Common Moorhen ( Gallinula chloropus ): A Conservation-Perspective Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reinsberg,Bernhard Wilfried & Michaelowa,Katharina & Knack,Stephen, 2015. "Which donors, which funds ? the choice of multilateral funds by bilateral donors at the World Bank," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7441, The World Bank.
    2. GUPTA Monika, 2019. "Decomposing The Role Of Different Factors In Co2 Emissions Increase In South Asia," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 72-86, April.
    3. Tancrède Voituriez, 2020. "The quest for green welfare state in developing countries," Working Papers hal-02876972, HAL.
    4. Paula Hanasz, 2017. "A Little Less Conversation? Track II Dialogue and Transboundary Water Governance," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 296-309, May.
    5. Naoko Uchiyama, 2016. "Consumption Smoothing, Risk Sharing and Household Vulnerability in Rural Mexico," Discussion Paper Series DP2016-06, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    6. Mukherjee, Swayambhu & Kar, Saibal, 2020. "Leveraging Non-Farm Income: Micro-evidence of Occupational Choice for Rural Households in India," MPRA Paper 109940, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Soma, Chakrabarti, 2019. "The West and Central Africa Advantage," IFAD Advantage Series 304754, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    8. Jelena Budak & Edo Rajh & Paul Stubbs, 2013. "Mind the Gap: Citizens’ and Companies’ Views of Business Culture in Croatia," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 15(1), pages 89-114, April.
    9. Tavana, Madjid & Ebrahimnejad, Ali & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. & Mansourzadeh, Seyed Mehdi & Matin, Reza Kazemi, 2018. "A hybrid DEA-MOLP model for public school assessment and closure decision in the City of Philadelphia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-89.
    10. Tarek Roshdy Gebba, 2015. "Corporate Governance Mechanisms Adopted by UAE National Commercial Banks," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 5(5), pages 1-2.
    11. Filipe Lage de Sousa & Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, 2018. "Relaxing credit constraints in emerging economies: The impact of public loans on the productivity of Brazilian manufacturers," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 154, pages 23-47.
    12. Adenuga Fabian Adekoya & Nor Azam Abdul Razak, 2018. "Unemployment and Violence: ARDL Endogeneity Approach. (Desempleo y violencia: Enfoque de endogeneidad ARDL)," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 155-176, October.
    13. Yan, Dong & Chen, Lin & Sun, Huaiwei & Liao, Weihong & Chen, Haorui & Wei, Guanghui & Zhang, Wenxin & Tuo, Ye, 2022. "Allocation of ecological water rights considering ecological networks in arid watersheds: A framework and case study of Tarim River basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Dorota Chapko, 2015. "Early Childhood Development and Skills Across the Life-Course Through the Lens of the Developing Brain," Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper Series 105199, The World Bank.
    15. Tolossa Fufa Gulema & Yadessa Tadesse Roba, 2021. "Internal and external determinants of corporate social responsibility practices in multinational enterprise subsidiaries in developing countries: evidence from Ethiopia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Mushawemhuka William & Rogerson Jayne M. & Saarinen Jarkko, 2018. "Nature-based tourism operators’ perceptions and adaptation to climate change in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 42(42), pages 115-127, December.
    17. Rachel Wolfgramm & Sian Flynn-Coleman & Denise Conroy, 2015. "Dynamic Interactions of Agency in Leadership (DIAL): An Integrative Framework for Analysing Agency in Sustainability Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(4), pages 649-662, February.
    18. Kent Matthews, 2014. "Cost Inefficiency in the Pakistan Banking Sector 2002-2009," SBP Research Bulletin, State Bank of Pakistan, Research Department, vol. 10, pages 1-20.
    19. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Röhe, Michaela & Renier, Noémie, 2017. "The access of microfinance institutions to debt capital: An empirical investigation of microfinance investment vehicles," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-15.
    20. Abdullah Ahmed Nasser Ghasham & Nik Ab Halim Nik Abdullah & Noor Hasmini Abd Ghani, 2016. "The Impact of Global Market Environment on the Degree of Cooperation of International Strategic Alliances among Service Firms," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(2), pages 192-198.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:278-:d:90470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.