IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1352-d143471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Farm Pond Habitat Suitability for the Common Moorhen ( Gallinula chloropus ): A Conservation-Perspective Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chun-Hsien Lai

    (Department of Soil and Water Conservation, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Shin-Hwei Lin

    (Department of Soil and Water Conservation, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Yi Tsai

    (Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Szu-Hung Chen

    (International Master Program of Agriculture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish a habitat-suitability assessment model for Gallinula chloropus , or the Common Moorhen, to be applied to the selection of the most suitable farm pond for habitat conservation in Chiayi County, Taiwan. First, the fuzzy Delphi method was employed to evaluate habitat selection factors and calculate the weights of these factors. The results showed that the eight crucial factors, by importance, in descending order, were (1) area ratio of farmlands within 200 m of the farm pond; (2) pond area; (3) pond perimeter; (4) aquatic plant coverage of the pond surface; (5) drought period; (6) coverage of high and low shrubs around the pond bank; (7) bank type; and (8) water-surface-to-bank distance. Subsequently, field evaluations of 75 farm ponds in Chiayi County were performed. The results indicated that 15 farm ponds had highly-suitable habitats and were inhabited by unusually high numbers of Common Moorhens; these habitats were most in need of conservation. A total of two farm ponds were found to require habitat-environment improvements, and Common Moorhens with typical reproductive capacity could be appropriately introduced into 22 farm ponds to restore the ecosystem of the species. Additionally, the habitat suitability and number of Common Moorhens in 36 farm ponds were lower than average; these ponds could be used for agricultural irrigation, detention basins, or for recreational use by community residents. Finally, the total habitat suitability scores and occurrence of Common Moorhens in each farm pond were used to verify the accuracy of the habitat-suitability assessment model for the Common Moorhen. The overall accuracy was 0.8, and the Kappa value was 0.60, which indicates that the model established in this study exhibited high credibility. To sum up, this is an applicable framework not only to assess the habitat suitability of farm ponds for Common Moorhens, but also to determine whether a particular location may require the implementation of conservation practices. Furthermore, the findings in this research can provide useful information to all relevant stakeholders involved in the implementation of wildlife-habitat conservation and restoration at farm ponds.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun-Hsien Lai & Shin-Hwei Lin & Chia-Yi Tsai & Szu-Hung Chen, 2018. "Identifying Farm Pond Habitat Suitability for the Common Moorhen ( Gallinula chloropus ): A Conservation-Perspective Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1352-:d:143471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shin-Ruoh Juang & Szu-Hung Chen & Chen-Fa Wu, 2017. "An Expert-Based Assessment Model for Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Pond-Breeding Amphibians," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1352-:d:143471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.