IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i1p916-931d44696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban and Rural MSW Stream Characterization for Separate Collection Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Ciuta

    (Department of Energy Production and Use, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independetei, 020371 Bucharest, Romania
    Current Address: Grove School of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, City College of New York, Steinman Hall, Room 314, 140th Street & Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031, USA)

  • Tiberiu Apostol

    (Department of Energy Production and Use, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independetei, 020371 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Valentin Rusu

    (Institute of Studies and Power Engineering, Bd. Lacul Tei 1-3, 020371 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In the new legislation framework enacted by new member countries of the European Union (EU), the characterization of municipal solid waste (MSW) represents an important instrument for local governments and sanitation operators in setting and achieving targets for waste recycling and recovery. This paper presents the results of a study conducted in accordance with the Romanian methodology for domestic wastes characterization ROMECOM, aiming to provide a proper basis for developing clear and realistic forecasts in current municipal waste management, based on MSW composition and generation rate. The analyzed MSW came both from areas where the waste is collected in mixed and separate ways, in urban and rural areas. The MSW composition by fraction is detailed for dense urban areas, urban areas, rural and touristic areas from Romania. Based on these results, the MSW composition was determined for the eight development regions in Romania, and a generation rate of 0.9·kgMSW inhabitant −1 ·day −1 for the urban region and 0.4·kgMSW inh −1 ·day −1 for the rural region was established. The calorific values of urban and rural areas were determined as 6801 kJ·kg −1 and 5613 kJ·kg −1 , respectively. In the perspective of sustainable development in this technical area, based on the obtained results and on the prognosis made for the following years, two proposals for urban and rural areas were developed for MSW treating options improvement. The two systems are characterized by selective collection (different efficiencies for urban and rural areas) with subsequent recovery of the separated materials and energy recovery of the residual waste in a large-scale waste to energy (WTE) plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Ciuta & Tiberiu Apostol & Valentin Rusu, 2015. "Urban and Rural MSW Stream Characterization for Separate Collection Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:916-931:d:44696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/916/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/916/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ettore Trulli & Vincenzo Torretta & Massimo Raboni & Salvatore Masi, 2013. "Incineration of Pre-Treated Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) for Energy Co-Generation in a Non-Densely Populated Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Singh, R.P. & Tyagi, V.V. & Allen, Tanu & Ibrahim, M. Hakimi & Kothari, Richa, 2011. "An overview for exploring the possibilities of energy generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) in Indian scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4797-4808.
    3. Zheng, Lijun & Song, Jiancheng & Li, Chuanyang & Gao, Yunguang & Geng, Pulong & Qu, Binni & Lin, Linyan, 2014. "Preferential policies promote municipal solid waste (MSW) to energy in China: Current status and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 135-148.
    4. Mikhail Rodionov & Toshihiko Nakata, 2011. "Design of an Optimal Waste Utilization System: A Case Study in St. Petersburg, Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. MIHAI, Florin Constantin, 2018. "Rural plastic emissions into the largestmountain lake of the Eastern Carpathians," SocArXiv ymzx7, Center for Open Science.
    2. Catalin Vrabie, 2021. "Converting Municipal Waste to Energy through the Biomass Chain, a Key Technology for Environmental Issues in (Smart) Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Florin-Constantin Mihai & Adrian Grozavu, 2019. "Role of Waste Collection Efficiency in Providing a Cleaner Rural Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Viridiana Del Carmen-Niño & Ricardo Herrera-Navarrete & Ana Laura Juárez-López & María Laura Sampedro-Rosas & Maximino Reyes-Umaña, 2023. "Municipal Solid Waste Collection: Challenges, Strategies and Perspectives in the Optimization of a Municipal Route in a Southern Mexican Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Mihai, Florin-Constantin, 2016. "East European recycling societies: The first steps of rural communities in Neamt County, Romania (A Glance at the World )," MPRA Paper 74244, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Florin Constantin Mihai, 2016. "East European recycling societies: The first steps of rural communities in Neamt County, Romania," Post-Print hal-01375664, HAL.
    7. Mihai, Florin-Constantin & Ingrao, Carlo, 2016. "Assessment of biowaste losses through unsound waste management practices in rural areas and the role of home composting," MPRA Paper 74854, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Aiqin Wang & Linxiu Zhang & Yaojiang Shi & Scott Rozelle & Annie Osborn & Meredith Yang, 2017. "Rural Solid Waste Management in China: Status, Problems and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Paul Taboada-González & Quetzalli Aguilar-Virgen & Liliana Márquez-Benavides, 2017. "Recyclables Valorisation as the Best Strategy for Achieving Landfill CO 2 e Emissions Abatement from Domestic Waste: Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, July.
    10. Przemysław Seruga, 2021. "The Municipal Solid Waste Management System with Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-9, April.
    11. Sha Cao & Dingde Xu & Shaoquan Liu, 2018. "A Study of the Relationships between the Characteristics of the Village Population Structure and Rural Residential Solid Waste Collection Services: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chuanwang Sun & Xiaochun Meng & Shuijun Peng, 2017. "Effects of Waste-to-Energy Plants on China’s Urbanization: Evidence from a Hedonic Price Analysis in Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Chhabra, Vibhuti & Bambery, Keith & Bhattacharya, Sankar & Shastri, Yogendra, 2020. "Thermal and in situ infrared analysis to characterise the slow pyrolysis of mixed municipal solid waste (MSW) and its components," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 388-401.
    3. Arbulú, Italo & Lozano, Javier & Rey-Maquieira, Javier, 2017. "The challenges of tourism to waste-to-energy public-private partnerships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 916-921.
    4. Zhang, Ning & Zhang, Duo & Zuo, Jian & Miller, Travis R. & Duan, Huabo & Schiller, Georg, 2022. "Potential for CO2 mitigation and economic benefits from accelerated carbonation of construction and demolition waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Chiripuci Bogdan-Cristian & Popescu Maria-Floriana, 2020. "Waste management in Europe – from theory to practice," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 23(77), pages 77-84, September.
    6. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Dassisti, Michele & Marković, Danijel & Vučković, Goran, 2014. "Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 190-201.
    7. Islam, K.M. Nazmul, 2018. "Municipal solid waste to energy generation: An approach for enhancing climate co-benefits in the urban areas of Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2472-2486.
    8. Kunwar, Bidhya & Cheng, H.N. & Chandrashekaran, Sriram R & Sharma, Brajendra K, 2016. "Plastics to fuel: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 421-428.
    9. Mavrotas, George & Gakis, Nikos & Skoulaxinou, Sotiria & Katsouros, Vassilis & Georgopoulou, Elena, 2015. "Municipal solid waste management and energy production: Consideration of external cost through multi-objective optimization and its effect on waste-to-energy solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1205-1222.
    10. Kristin Faye Olalo & Jun Nakatani & Tsuyoshi Fujita, 2022. "Optimal Process Network for Integrated Solid Waste Management in Davao City, Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Dongliang Zhang & Guangqing Huang & Yimin Xu & Qinghua Gong, 2015. "Waste-to-Energy in China: Key Challenges and Opportunities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Lopes, E.J. & Okamura, L.A. & Maruyama, S.A. & Yamamoto, C.I., 2018. "Evaluation of energy gain from the segregation of organic materials from municipal solid waste in gasification processes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 623-629.
    13. Delang Claudio O., 2017. "Causes and distribution of soil pollution in China," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Song, Jinbo & Nie, Rong & Yuan, Hehui & Gao, Jingxin, 2023. "Does the renovation of waste-to-energy incineration plants attenuate the housing price gradient? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Shenzhen, China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Lohri, Christian Riuji & Rajabu, Hassan Mtoro & Sweeney, Daniel J. & Zurbrügg, Christian, 2016. "Char fuel production in developing countries – A review of urban biowaste carbonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1514-1530.
    16. Zhiliang Chen & Wei Chang & Xuguang Jiang & Shengyong Lu & Alfons Buekens & Jianhua Yan, 2016. "Leaching Behavior of Circulating Fluidised Bed MSWI Air Pollution Control Residue in Washing Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Hui Hu & Xiang Li & Anh Dung Nguyen & Philip Kavan, 2015. "A Critical Evaluation of Waste Incineration Plants in Wuhan (China) Based on Site Selection, Environmental Influence, Public Health and Public Participation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2022. "Life cycle thinking of plasma gasification as a waste-to-energy tool: Review on environmental, economic and social aspects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Li, Wangliang & Gupta, Rohit & Zhang, Zhikai & Cao, Lixia & Li, Yanqing & Show, Pau Loke & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Kumar, Sunil & Lin, Kun-Yi Andrew & Varjani, Sunita & Connelly, Stephanie & You, Siming, 2023. "A review of high-solid anaerobic digestion (HSAD): From transport phenomena to process design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Safar, Korai Muhammad & Bux, Mahar Rasool & Faria, Uqaili & Pervez, Shaikh, 2021. "Integrated model of municipal solid waste management for energy recovery in Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:916-931:d:44696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.